| |
Course Texts
Scriptural texts: esp. Genesis (Creation) and
Revelation (Apocalypse)
H. G. Wells,
The Time Machine (1895)
Octavia Butler,
Parable of the Sower (1993)
Future Primitive:
The New Ecotopias, ed. K. S.
Robinson (1994)
Virtually Now: Stories of Science, Technology and the
Future, ed. J. Schinto (1996)
+ online texts & email handouts—see reading schedule below
|
Graded Work
Reading
quizzes (app. 10%, more if
results are far below average.)
Pre-Midterm
(start Essay 1 + Essay 2 research proposal; 22-24 February,
20%?)
Midterm
(In-class or email, 27 March; 30-40%)
Final Exam (8
May,
email deadline 9 May.; 40-50%) Grades are
not computed mathematically; percentages indicate only assignments' approximate relative weight. Only letter grades are given.
Pluses
and minuses may appear on component and final grades.
Class Presentations, participation,
attendance (app. 10-20%, graded
silently)
Future-Vision
Presentation
Discussion-Starter
Model
Assignments Highlights
Class preparation and
participation
Attendance:
One free cut allowed without comment or penalty. Two or more absences or
partial absences, even with good excuses, lower final grade, potentially
seriously.
Final grade report
Course
policies |
|
Course Objectives
including essential
terms
|
|
(Objectives 1-5
provide central terms and themes for the premidterm, midterm, and final exam.
As learning outcomes,
students are expected to identify and use these terms or concepts in relation to each other
and course texts. Objectives 6-9 are themes
recurring throughout discussions, lectures, and readings that students are
invited to develop in presentations and exams.)
1.
To identify, describe, and criticize
3 standard
narratives or stories
humans tell about the future: (progress,
decline, or both?)
|
1b.
Evolution
(cyclical or spiral time)
cosmic /
geologic time scales: millions, billions of solar years, galactic years |
enlarge |
2.
Identify, describe, and criticize typical
visions or
scenarios of the future (seen from
2019).
a.
high
tech; virtual reality—slick, cool, unreal, easy with power (+ cyberpunk
style)
b. low tech; actual reality—raw, intimate, messy, hungry, warm, real
c. utopia
/ dystopia & ecotopia—perfectly
planned worlds / dysfunctional world / + ecology
d.
off-planet / alien contact—exploring and being explored;
self & other
Objective 3—Narratives,
Symbols, &
figures of speech in a
literature of ideas
3.
To comprehend basic theories of
narrative, plot, or story + narrative's relation to
symbol
& other
figures of speech.
-
Humans are story-telling creatures
who
live, react, learn, and decide via
narratives that express
symbolic fears and desires
as people or other agents acting and speaking together in time;.
-
Narratives are both
personal and
collective; literary and historical—very inclusive concept.
-
Four traditional
"narrative genres":
comedy, romance,
satire,
tragedy, plus combinations.
-
The dominant popular
narrative
for
literature of the future and especially science fiction is "romance,"
a.k.a. adventure, hero's story, survival & transcendence.
-
The Sublime: the
aesthetics of
rapid, apocalyptic change.
3a. Metaphor and analogy—expressing the
unknown in terms of the known—as a creative and learning
figure of speech in all
literature, but especially science fiction
and speculative fiction.
3b. Literature of the Future is somewhat unique in that the
"reality" to which it refers does not yet exist, exposing how much all
literature is an act of creative expression and interpretation.
Objective 4—standard or traditional Genres
of literature about the future
4.
To identify
subject genres of future literature
-
prophecy
-
science fiction, sf, speculative
fiction, sci-fi, fantasy; hard & soft sf + sub-genre:
cyberpunk (virtual reality plus
real-world actuality)
-
utopias, dystopias, ecotopias
- Secondary school
curricula and young adult reading tastes often favor
dystopia, utopias, and other forms of
science fiction or
speculative fiction. Relate to
Literature of Ideas.
- As a
Literature of Ideas,
science fiction and other literatures
of the future naturally engage us with content, but as a Literature course
we need to keep learning how some literature works (or not) through
narratives,
symbols, &
figures of speech.
Secondary Course Objectives
(Recurrent themes or issues you may develop in exams and presentations)
5.
Is the future "written" (i. e., set, fixed, programmed, and usually
apocalyptic) or "being
written" ("open-ended" and usually
evolutionary)?
6.
To see literature of the future as reflections or
projections of the present in
which it is written. (How much change from normal can readers process?)
7.
To note literary strategies and problems such as how to make the future
both familiar and exotic. (Or “comforting / challenging”; “friendly /
unfriendly”; “warm / cold”). See Wells's
Law.
8.
To distinguish distinct temporal dimensions of the future
-
Near future;
short-term; day-after-tomorrow (often dramatic or apocalyptic change, such
as alien contact)
-
Deep future,
long-term (usually evolutionary change involving
changing environments and
adaptations)
-
Alternative depths of future between, beyond,
parallel, or skew.
Reading & Presentation Schedule
LITR 4368, Spring 2019
|
|
Initial guide
to course anthologies:
FP
= Future Primitive: The New Ecotopias ed. K. S. Robinson (1994);
VN
= Virtually Now: Stories of Science, Technology and the Future
|
Default questions for every class:
1. Gender:
2. Family identities and relations:
3.
|
|
Wednesday, 30 January:
Apocalyptic scriptures
Readings:
Read through
Scriptural Texts of Creation & Apocalypse
terms:
Millennium / Apocalypse,
prophecy,
sublime,
symbol
Discussion-starter:
Eric Cheney
Future-vision presenter: instructor
Model Assignments Highlights
(pre-midterms): instructor
|
Agenda:
emails, presentations + info sheets,
Assign
Parable of the Sower;
creation or origin story /
Millennialism
symbols &
narratives;
dystopia > millennium
> utopia;
decline or progress?
future-vision:
instructor
Carl Orff,
from Carmina Burana;
Beethoven, Ode to
Joy;
flashmob Ode
Reading
quiz on reading assignments
[break]
Teaching religion as literature
Discussion-starter: Eric
romance narrative
web-highlight:
Pre- &
Midterm assignments,
Model Assignments (developing your
essay, using terms) |
|
Challenge to reading:
Not many
people read the Bible as though it were a literary text like a novel—most
read it more like a reference book like a dictionary or a self-help
book. You probably won't read every word of Genesis and Revelation, but
try to see what kinds of stories (narratives) they're telling and how we
identify (or identify with) their symbols. You'll get a reading quiz for
the assignment with broad-enough questions.
Discussion Questions:
1. Creation-Apocalypse
narratives exemplify the linear model
of time, but what parts of today's apocalyptic texts suggest a
more complex model or
dimensions beyond "Point A to Point B?"
2.
Narrative genres: How
does the plot-pattern of Revelation resemble the plot narrative of a
romance? Pay attention to the gradual revelation of the
central character of Jesus—how does he appear? How is he like a hero in a
romance-rescue story? How are the Satanic figures like the villain?
3.
Symbols are among the most striking and
obvious devices of prophecy and apocalyptic literature, e.g. popular references to
"666," "The Beast," "Anti-Christ," "The Whore of Babylon,"
"Signs in the Heavens," etc. What can
we learn about
symbols'
functions in literature generally from their power in apocalyptic
literature? How may religious literature help students understand the
operation of
symbols in human language, thought, and
society?
Special questions for End-Times literature
and
reading or teaching scripture as literature. (We
can't get to all of these, but they suggest millennial literature's many
points of interest for literary and cultural criticism.)
4. If
Revelation and other apocalyptic texts are among the most popular
parts of the Bible, why? What
literary appeals? (<in
contrast to appeals to faith, religious belief, etc.) How does
Revelation seem different from other Biblical or scriptural texts
like the Gospels? (Eastern Orthodox churches
don't include Revelation in the Bible.)
5. What impulses for social or personal change,
or what social consequences, result from apocalyptic texts and thought? How does
apocalyptic thinking influence attitudes toward
decline or progress?
6. Jesus was crucified
around 30-36AD, and the Book of Revelation was written between 70
and 95AD.
Matthew 24.34 records Jesus saying,
"This generation shall not pass, till all
these things be fulfilled." What social
or evolutionary consequences to perennial belief that "ours is the last generation?"
Added question:
Apocalyptic thinking
and literature are always popular to some degree, but why are
Millennials naturally fascinated by apocalyptic films (alien invasion,
zombie apocalypse), post-apocalyptic romance narratives (young
adulty dystopias like Hunger Games, Maze Runners,
The Giver), and more traditional scriptural apocalypses (Left
Behind series, + ISIS jihadism is apocalyptic-cultish).
|
|
|
Discussion Questions:
1. Compare
Parable to
Revelation. How
are both
apocalyptic? How are
the opening chapters also like a
creation or origin story? Compare to
Genesis?
1.a. Describe Parable of the Sower as
science fiction or
speculative fiction. (Compare / contrast Genesis, Revelation, etc. as scripture—status,
prestige, authority, etc.)
1b. As
science fiction
or speculative fiction, how
does Parable incorporate
evolution?
What familiar assumptions, terms, or
metaphors do characters speak that identify an
evolutionary mentality?
(For instance, human behavior
as survival, change, adaptation? Contrast to sin and virtue, or faith vs.
lack of faith?)
1c. Science fiction is not just science but also
fiction (see
genres):
How is
Parable
fictional in representational form, and how is
its narrative
romance?
(instructor will lead)
1d. Lauren also develops her own
theology—compare, contrast her father's Baptist faith? (Both use
aphorisms and parables, both predict
future?)
2. Compare biblical
apocalypse and environmental apocalypse?
3.
Compare Parable of the Sower (1993) with more recent YA
dystopia / post-apocalyptic novels like The Hunger Games
(2006-10) and other
young adult dystopias?
4. How
has
science fiction
/ speculative fiction
reinforced or challenged traditional gender and racial identities? In
Parable of the Sower, how does Lauren's persona represent
evolving gender modalities in
science /
speculative fiction (esp. YA
dystopias, e.g. Katniss in The Hunger Games)
or even classic literature?
|
|
|
Discussion Questions:
1. Continue comparisons with Genesis / Revelation
and other apocalyptic texts. Does
Lauren qualify as a "prophet?" Earthseed as
prophecy? Earthseed
community as
utopia? (cf.
heaven at end of
Revelation)
2.
Discuss blending of
apocalypse and
evolution
in Parable of Sower (and later texts like Time Machine).
2a. How are
both present? How account for
co-presence instead of mutual exclusion?
2b.
Where do
apocalypse and
evolution diverge? Where do they meet? Can you reconcile seeing the world as
both
apocalypse and evolution, rather than one excluding the other? If so, how?
2c. What are the
signs,
symbols,
or keywords of creation-apocalypse and
evolution?
3. Broadly, how does
Parable of
the Sower succeed (or not) in
making you care about the
future? Or does it just make you want to buy guns, hoard gold, hide,
and distrust anyone who's not in your family or church?
4.
Science fiction
and many
other forms of
popular literature do not age well.
Parable of the Sower is now 20+ years old. How out of date is
it already? How much closer are we to its time-frame? If the novel
survives and remains readable and interesting, why? What literary qualities make it somewhat timeless
or classic?
5.
Compare Parable of the Sower
(1993) with more recent YA dystopia / post-apocalyptic novels like
The Hunger Games
(2006-10) and other
young adult dystopias?
6.
How has
science fiction / speculative fiction
reinforced or challenged traditional gender and racial identities? In
Parable of the Sower, how does Lauren's persona represent
evolving gender modalities in
science /
speculative fiction (esp. YA
dystopias, e.g. Katniss in The Hunger Games)
or even classic literature?
|
|
|
Discussion Questions:
1. What key
terms,
symbols, or ways of thinking
signal that these stories operate in a world built on
evolutionary premises? (Consider
terms or ideas like change, adaptation,
, extinction, survival, + plenty of animal
characters and symbols.)
1a. How is "Stone Lives"
potentially
apocalyptic
or post-apocalyptic? How are its apparent
apocalypses
or catastrophes absorbed into a larger
evolutionary
narrative?
2. What picture of humanity
do these stories (and evolutionary models) create? What assumptions about
how nature, time,
and society are
organized, esp. in contrast to creation-apocalypse?
3. Preview
high tech / low tech scenarios
(13 & 20 Nov.): Are "Stone Lives" & "Bears"
high tech
or low
tech sf? What different appeals?
4.
"Stone Lives"
is our most
typical popular-literature, old-fashioned
science fiction story all semester—How? Discuss
formulaic gender,
depiction of
world, and esp.
romance narrative
(esp. macho-superhero protagonist tasked with saving a pre- or
post-apocalyptic scene while babes swoon and die).
5. "Bears" is an unusually
humorous sf story—how? What makes it
amusing? Consider
low
tech + How does its narrative fit the definition of
comedy?
How may
humor or
comedy serve science fiction's
function of making science familiar or comfortable to non-scientific
readers? (comic
theory) |
|
22-24 February:
pre-midterm
due by email (includes midterm Essay 1 introduction & Essay 2
research proposal)
|
Discussion Questions:
1.
Science
fiction has built-in problems as classic
literature, but H. G.
Wells maintains status and influence as the greatest "classic"
science fiction writer. What qualities distinguish his
style? What models
does he create for
science fiction
in terms of
style, action, and
character? What mix of science and
fiction? Compare to Parable
of the Sower?
2.
The Time Machine was written in
1895, a generation after Darwin's
Origin of Species (1859): What signs, terms,
or symbols of evolution in
Time
Machine? Is its plot
evolutionary or
apocalyptic?
3.
Evolution as
progress or
decline? How does
changing the time scale (from near to distant future) change the perception?
4. Identify
"Social Darwinism" (e.g., "survival of the fittest") with cultural, class,
or biological developments in
The Time Machine or post-liberal USA.
5. "Somebody up there Likes Me": How is Wells's
industrial-era
evolution updated to digital-era technology? What
styles or
symbols are updated in terms of gender, action, humor? How
are both
evolution and creation-apocalypse present in the same text?
5a. "Somebody" (cont'd): Published in 1994, this might be Literature of
the Future's most current, hippest test. What feels current or
futuristic about its language or scenario?
5b. In my years of teaching this story, I've always had to point out the
evolutionary metaphors and symbols in this text—why?
Does it mean that evolution isn't true or that we've so completely
absorbed its worldview that we don't notice its metaphors and symbols? |
|
Wednesday,
6 March
(transition from evolution to alternative futures)
Readings:
conclude
The Time Machine (ch. 6 through
epilogue);
Bruce Sterling & Lewis Shiner, "Mozart
in Mirrorshades" (email PDF)
Discussion-starter: Ruth
Brown (either Time Machine or "Mozart" or both)
Future-vision presenter: Jacob
Burchett
|
Agenda:
premidterm, schedule, midterm
"Somebody Up There Likes Me"
Wells
future-vision: Jacob
quiz
Time Machine / Mozart
discussion:
Ruth
alternative futures & assignments |
Sphinx in Time Machine |
Discussion Questions:
Time Machine:
Conclude Evolution Section; continue questions
above +
1. conclusion of Eloi-Morlock story:
apocalyptic or
evolutionary? How like a
romance narrative?
How is the ending like "Stone Lives?"
2. Late in
novel, very deep future—what storytelling challenges
to deep-future science fiction? (cf. evolution narrative)
3. Summarize science fiction style
+ problems or
issues with "classic science fiction." How does Wells survive
as "classic sf" when so little sf does?
"Mozart in Mirrorshades":
Begin
Alternative Futures.
1.
Look for key terms in quantum
& temporal
physics: probability,
temporal physics, time holes, parallel worlds.
2. Alternative
futures--note metaphors of "branching" ("Garden of Forking
Paths")
3. How does "Mozart in Mirrorshades" exemplify
sf as a way to make a topic like
alternative futures friendly, non-threatening, or accessible to average readers?
Compare wit, humor,
satire, and / or
comedy to "Bears Discover Fire."
|
|
Wednesday, 13 March: no class meeting—Spring Break!
|
Discussion Questions:
1. H ow convincingly do
today's texts represent or make
you feel the possibility of
Alternative Futures,
either through literary techniques or scientific references? If you have
problems with these texts, how much do those problems result from the inherent
difficulties of imagining alternative futures?
1a. What
metaphors or
analogies make this
disconcerting concept familiar or imaginable?
What mental images of alternative futures, besides "Garden of Forking
Paths?" Branching tree?
Maze or labyrinth? Altered mentality?
Alternative sexuality? Multiple personality? Music in concert?
1b. Especially in
"Gernsback Continuum", observe glimpses of scientific background for
alternative futures, esp. quantum physics as "probability."
What is the effect on a non-scientific reader of such references?
2. What attractions, repulsions to
Alternative Futures,
compared to
apocalyptic or
evolutionary narratives?
3. How may alternative futures correspond not only to
postmodern physics but postmodern humanity's evolution to a
multicultural, alternatively gendered society? Where do the stories show
glimpses of a multicultural or alt-gendered society co-evolving with
alternative futures?
4. How does "Better Be Ready" (1993) show a
contemporary style comparable to "Somebody Up There Likes Me?" (1994).
|
|
Wednesday, 27
March:
official date of
midterm exam
email midterms
due to
whiteC@uhcl.edu by midnight,
Thursday, 28 March No regular class
meeting; attendance not required. Instructor keeps office hours during
midterm period.
Bayou 2529-7; 281 283 3380;
whiteC@uhcl.edu. |
|
Visions / Scenarios of the Future
(objective 2 >
final exam)
machine-human interface |
high
tech;
virtual reality
&
Cyberpunk Style
slick, cool, sharp, unreal, & easy with power |
Google-Glasses: a human-machine interface that didn't
quite happen (but may be happening after all) |
Wednesday, 3 April:
high-tech future, cyberpunk literature
Readings:
William Gibson,
"Johnny
Mnemonic"; William Gibson,
"Burning Chrome";
Richard Goldstein, "The
Logical Legend of Heliopause and Cyberfiddle" (VN 159-180).
Discussion-starter:
Beau Manshack
Future-vision presenter:
Brandon Burrow, Zachariah Gandin, Beau Manshack, group prsn on
Cyberpunk (continues 10 April)
|
Agenda:
midterms,
final
scenarios,
high-tech,
low-tech (JM 7.1-2)
assignments,
future
vision: Backrow Boys quiz
[break]
discussion: Beau |
|
Backgrounds:
Cyberpunk
in the 1980s and 90s represented a major "mainstreaming" of
science fiction into
literary fiction, with
William Gibson ("The Gernsback Continuum") as the
movement's defining figure. Gibson's writings, beginning with
Neuromancer (1984), influenced
metaphors and visions /
scenarios with which writers, film-makers, and everyday
people imagined or described the
high-tech
world of
virtual reality and the
human-machine interface.
Discussion Questions:
1. What
do you like or dislike about cyberpunk
style and
why? ("Cyber" = cybernetics or artificial
intelligence; "punk" = 70s-80s countercultural street
style or attitude) 2. Gibson is admired
as one of science fiction's
best stylists, but his writing often leaves students
cold.
What strengths? What resemblances to
literary fiction? (e.g.
imagery,
metaphor, range of reference or
allusion)
What weaknesses? (e.g. thin characterization, plot-turns on subtle
shifts in human-machine relations rather than formulaic
characterizations and whiz-bang action of popular
science fiction)
What metaphors for computers,
their users, and their realities does his style create?
What human-machine interfaces seen elsewhere in course?
(e.g., bionic implants, human penetration of machines, body augmentation)
Gender stylings?
(stereotypical background: sf for geeky white guys > implications for women's
identities?) (recall "Stone Lives")
3. What attraction-repulsion of
high-tech future?
Consider organic / non-organic; actual / virtual reality; real people /
social media.
|
|
|
Discussion Questions:
1. If you didn't (or did) like the cyberpunk /
high-tech
/ virtual reality stories, what opposing values or appeals of content
or style do these
low-tech stories offer?
2. What
utopian / dystopian elements?
Identify different appeals
of low-tech and
high-tech.
3. Contrast organic or
biological appeals of
low-tech with non-organic
or tech appeals of
high-tech.
4. What elements of
Romanticism and
romance
narrative?
(e.g., nostalgia for organic nature, sentimental human bonds of family;
quest for transcendent meaning in antagonistic environment.)
5. Octavia
Butler, author of Parable of the Sower, wrote "Speech
Sounds"—how do you recognize her
style and subject matter?
|
|
|
Discussion Questions:
1. What are your experiences
reading, studying, or teaching utopian or dystopian fiction in American middle
schools and high schools? E.g., Brave New World, Anthem, Nineteen Eighty-Four,
Fahrenheit 451, Lord of the Flies,
The Giver,
The Hunger Games and other
Young Adult Dystopias.
What are the attractions of these genres or sub-genres? Why does
American reading go more toward dystopias than utopias? (See
Laura Miller on YA
Dystopian fiction.)
1a.What is
utopian
or potentially dystopian about
the "ecotopias" in today's texts or in popular culture?
(e.g., "small is beautiful," "voluntary
simplicity")
2. Art or literature
"entertains and educates".
Some literature entertains more, some educates more; Where do the two stories fall on this
spectrum? (related terms: didactic literature;
Literature of Ideas; what
terms for pleasure-reading?).
If "Chocco" is more didactic or instructional, what
fictional features
make it somewhat more entertaining, or relieve the educational edge?
What kinds of literary pleasures does "Chocco" offer?
(Consider characterization.)
How and why is "House of Bones" more entertaining as
fiction than
"Chocco?" In what ways may it still succeed as "instructive" or
"educational?"
Any questions or comments generally about today's readings?
3. What are the urgencies
and difficulties of discussing
overpopulation and climate change? Does science fiction provide a way to discuss?
What upsides, downsides to fiction as learning?
What metaphors or
symbols enable us to imagine a sustainable future?
4. Why is it difficult to write stories that
make people care for the environment? What inherent challenges are
there to
ecological literature or to making people think and care
collectively on a grand scale?
Ecology requires collective responsibility
for a shared world with no escape. Apocalypse
may not save anyone or anything, but it makes for good story-telling.
Most stories require
individual heroes,
family or tribal dynamics, and simple
solutions or escapes in short time-frames; apocalypse or end-times are no problem as long as someone else takes
the heat! Human sustainability requires longer time-frames;
evolution
takes generations.
|
|
humans = Rambo; aliens = super-terrorist reptiles or insects |
alien contact
exploring and being explored;
self & other
|
We come in peace! (Aliens as cuddle-toys) |
|
Discussion Questions:
1.
How do today's readings fulfill
the
scenario for Alien
Contact?
2. What
do we learn about ourselves and the unknown as a result of reading Alien
Contact stories about the future?
2a. What literary techniques make you
understand, care, and learn about the unknown? (e.g.,
metaphor, allusion,
irony,
the sublime)
2b.
How does
alien-contact science fiction change our view of humanity
on earth? If humans and aliens represent
"the self and the other,"
what do "they" reveal about "us?"
2c.
Given the
scale and mystery of the universe, how much does alien contact
literature feel religious in some sense? Cf.
the sublime
(Hinterlands 3.1, 3.7)
3. How successfully do the stories get beyond
predictable formulas or
conventions of popular
science fiction and become
literary fiction? (e.g.
characterization, interior
complexity, ambiguous conclusions instead of triumphalism?)
3a. How much do characters escape the good guy-bad guy-confused
woman characterization of popular
science fiction or the aliens-as-terrorists models from The War of the
Worlds, Independence Day
or other standard "Earth vs. Aliens" movies in which aliens automatically
appear as apocalyptic terrorists or as innocent child-like wise men
(e.g., E.T., Yoda)?
3b.
How can you identify William Gibson's style in
"The
Belonging Kind" and
"Hinterlands" from our previous readings ("Gernsback Continuum";
"Johnny
Mnemonic"; "Burning Chrome")?
Consider
extended metaphor and
anti-hero characterization.
General pop-culture questions:
4. Since alien-visitation or "contact" is about as
true or likely as ghost stories
but is frequently represented in popular literature and film, what
purposes does this subject serve for us? Why do we prefer stories about
aliens to stories about our environment?
5. How do alien-contact futures represent our
future narratives of apocalypse, evolution,
or alternative futures? |
|
|
Discussion Questions:
1. What issues about "our future in space"
do our readings raise?
1a. As
in "Newton's Sleep," Is our home on Earth a place we must make livable
and beautiful for all, or is there a part of being human (or modern
American) that insists on breaking its limits for something greater and
potentially terrifying?
2. What literary techniques make you
understand, care, and learn? (e.g.,
metaphor, allusion,
irony,
the sublime)
2b.
How can you identify William Gibson's style in and
"Hinterlands" from our previous readings ("Gernsback Continuum";
"Johnny
Mnemonic"; "Burning Chrome",
"The
Belonging Kind")?
Consider
extended metaphor and
anti-hero characterization.
3. How does outer-space sf change our view of humanity
on earth? If humans and aliens represent
"the self and the other," what do
"they" reveal about "us?"
4. How successfully do the stories get beyond the "War of the
Worlds" model seen in Independence Day
or other standard "Earth vs. Aliens" movies in which aliens automatically
appear as apocalyptic terrorists?
General pop-culture questions:
5. Since aliens probably don't exist but are
constantly represented in popular culture, what purposes do they serve
for us? Why do we prefer stories about aliens to stories about our
environment?
6. What dimensions of time or the future do aliens
represent? Evolutionary or apocalyptic? Near-future or deep-future?
|
|
Wednesday, 8 May: official date for
final exam; email exams due Thursday, 9 May.
No regular class meeting. Attendance not required.
instructor holds office hours
4-10pm 8 May. (Bayou 2529; 281 283 3380;
whitec@uhcl.edu)
Final grade reports will be emailed approximately a week after due date.
Laura Miller, 2012 review of Elaine Pagels, Revelations
Nassim
Nicholas Taleb, "The Future will not be Cool"
"Chatter of Doomsday Makes
Beijing Nervous," New York Times 19 Dec. 2012
Michael Lind,
"Stop Pretending Cyberspace Exists," Salon.Com 12 Feb.
2013
"Why are Birthrates Falling
around the World? Blame Television."
Washington Post 13 May 2013
Hubble space telescope pictures
Humans Need Not Apply
http://www.motherjones.com/media/2015/04/weekly-world-news-clintons-aliens
Three
Pound Brain: The Future of Literature in
the Age of Information
Can Evolution have a
higher purpose?
Maintained by: Craig White - whitec@uhcl.edu
Copyright © 1995 University of Houston - Clear Lake
2700 Bay Area Blvd.
Houston, TX 77058
|