| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
Course Texts
Scriptural texts: esp. Genesis (Creation) and
Revelation (Apocalypse)
H. G. Wells,
The Time Machine (1895)
Octavia Butler,
Parable of the Sower (1993)
Future Primitive:
The New Ecotopias, ed. K. S.
Robinson (1994)
Virtually Now: Stories of Science, Technology and the
Future, ed. J. Schinto (1996)
+ online texts & handouts--see reading schedule below
|
Graded Work
-
Reading
quizzes (app. 10%, or more if
results are far below average.)
-
Midterm
(In-class or email, 20 June; 30-40%)
-
Final Exam (2 July,
in-class or email; 40-50%)
Class Presentations, participation,
attendance (app. 10-20%, graded
silently)
Grades not computed mathematically; percentages indicate only assignments' approximate relative weight. Only letter grades are given.
Pluses
and minuses may appear on component and final grades.
Final grade report
Course
policies |
|
Course Objectives
including essential
terms
|
|
(Objectives 1-5 are central themes for the midterm and final exams.
As learning outcomes,
you are expected to identify and use these terms or concepts in relation to each other
and course texts. Objectives 6-9 are themes
recurring throughout discussions, lectures, and readings that students are
invited to develop in presentations and exams.)
1.
To identify, describe, and criticize
3 standard
narratives or stories
humans tell about the future:
|
1b.
Evolution
cosmic /
geologic time scales: millions > billions of years, light-years,
time-space |
enlarge |
1d. Relate future
narratives to traditional
narrative genres & corresponding
figures of speech.
Objective 2—Visions / Scenarios of the Future |
|
2.
To identify, describe, and criticize typical
visions or
scenarios of the future (seen from 2013).
a.
high
tech; virtual reality—slick, cool, unreal, easy with power (+ cyberpunk
style)
b. low tech; actual reality—rough,
intimate, messy, hungry, warm, real
c. utopia
/ dystopia / ecotopia—perfectly
planned worlds / dysfunctional world / + ecology
d.
off-planet / alien contact—exploring and being explored
Objective 3—Narrative
& Symbol
3.
To comprehend basic theories of
narrative, plot, or story + narrative's relation to
symbol.
-
Humans are story-telling creatures
who
live, react, and decide in
narratives that express our
symbolic fears and desires.
-
Narratives are both individual and
collective; literary and historical—very inclusive concept.
-
Four traditional
"narrative genres":
comedy, romance, satire, tragedy, plus combinations.
-
The dominant popular narrative for
literature of the future and especially science fiction is "romance."
-
The Sublime
Objective 4—Genres
4.
To identify
subject genres of future literature
Objective 5—Teaching, Learning, Testing
5.
To articulate teaching, learning, & evaluation methods for special course
content
-
Instructor and students share
standard knowledge + new contexts or applications; students react to first-time readings,
as instructor welcomes extensions of
previous learning.
-
Exams require basic comprehension and
expression of course objectives, but excellence occurs when students
extend or refresh learning with fresh examples,
insights, and expression.
-
Can new sections of courses build on
previous sections' accomplishments?
Model Assignments
- Correlate traditional
literary themes like mimesis and
entertainment & education,
and traditional teaching practices like
critical thinking,
with special texts and subjects.
Secondary Course Objectives
(Recurrent themes or issues you may develop in exams and presentations)
6.
Is the future "written" (i. e., set, fixed, programmed, and usually
apocalyptic) or "being
written" ("open-ended" and usually
evolutionary)?
7.
To see literature of the future as reflections of the present in
which it is written. (How much change from normal can readers process?)
8.
To note literary strategies and problems such as how to make the future
both familiar and exotic. (Or “comforting / challenging”; “friendly /
unfriendly”; “warm / cold”). See Wells's
Law.
9.
To distinguish distinct temporal dimensions of the future
-
Near future;
short-term; day-after-tomorrow (often dramatic or apocalyptic change, such
as alien contact)
-
Deep future,
long-term (usually evolutionary change involving
changing environments and
adaptations)
-
Alternative depths of future between, beyond,
parallel, or skew
Reading & Presentation Schedule:
LITR 4632, Summer 2013 |
|
Initial guide
to course anthologies:
BC
= Burning Chrome
FP
= Future Primitive: The New Ecotopias ed. K. S. Robinson (1994)
VN
= Virtually Now: Stories of Science, Technology and the Future
|
Self-introductions: Identify
yourself and educational / career interests; what previous knowledge or
reading of our texts? Familiarity with science fiction in reading or
movies? Familiarity with end-time prophecy?
Discussion Questions:
Reading religious texts as literature? How does
anyone read scripture? What attitudes toward Biblical
Creation & Evolution?
Genesis as Origin Story / Creation
Story: familiarity with genre?
How does the Creation story in Genesis set up Revelation? |
|
Tuesday, 4 June:
Readings:
Continue
Scriptural Texts of Creation & Apocalypse
+
brief sample
from Nostradamus
terms:
Millennium / Apocalypse,
prophecy,
sublime,
symbol
Discussion-starter:
Sera Perkins, Elizabeth Lea Suffron
Web-highlighter (midterms): instructor
terms:
images,
symbols,
genre, utopia,
narrative genre,
romance narrative
|
Agenda:
genesis & time; terms: genres
Review
presentation assignments
Assign
Parable of the Sower
quiz on scriptural texts
images & symbols
Discussion-starters:
Sera, Lea
Instructor's questions;
utopias in scripture; narrative genres & romance;
web-highlight:
midterms (grading standards) |
|
Discussion Questions:
1. If you're reading these
Biblical-Apocalyptic texts for the first time, what seems new or strange
compared to your previous cultural knowledge of "End-Times?" If you've read such
texts previously in your church or family, what changes when you read them as
"literature?" What appeals or dangers in
reading or teaching scripture as literature?
2. What is surprising or creative about
the process of reading several different biblical texts as a
single text? Consider
intertextuality.
3. Why is the Book of Revelation (along with other apocalyptic texts) always
a popular
favorite. What literary appeals? How does it seem different from other Biblical
or scriptural texts?
4. What impulses for social or personal change,
or what social consequences, result from apocalyptic texts and thought? How does
apocalyptic thinking influence attitudes toward
decline or progress?
5. Jesus was crucified
around 30-36AD, and the Book of Revelation was written between 70
and 95AD. Matthew 24.34 records Jesus saying,
"This generation shall not pass, till all
these things be fulfilled." What social
consequences to perennial belief that "ours is the last generation?"
6. How does the plot-pattern of Revelation resemble the
plot narrative of a
romance? Pay attention to the gradual revelation of the
central character of Jesus—how does he appear? How is he like a hero in a
story? How are the Satanic figures like the villain? (instructor will lead)
7. End-times literature exemplifies the linear model
of time, but what parts of the texts suggest a more complex model or
dimensions beyond "Point A to Point B?"
|
|
|
Discussion Questions:
1. Conclude Apocalyptic
scriptures: upsides / downsides of
interpreting Scripture as literary text?
Attractions / detractions of apocalyptic
narrative?
2. Compare
Parable to Revelation. How
apocalyptic?
2a. Describe Parable of the Sower as
science fiction / speculative
fiction (compare / contrast scripture).
2b. As
science fiction, how
does Parable incorporate
evolution?
(for instance, human behavior in terms of
change and adaptation; contrast to sin and virtue, or faith vs.
lack of faith in revelation)
2c. As science fiction,
it's also
fiction (see
genres):
How is
Parable
fictional in representational form, and how is
its narrative
romance?
(instructor will lead)
2d. Lauren also develops her own theology--compare, contrast her
father's Baptist belief.
3. Compare biblical
apocalypse and environmental apocalypse?
|
|
Monday, 10 June:
apocalypse and evolution
Readings:
Parable of the Sower (complete)
Discussion-starter (Parable):
Rachel Jungklaus
Future-vision presenter:
Ashley Sauceda
|
Agenda:
preview Butler later in summer
evolution +
assignments
quiz
discussion: Rachel
[break]
utopias / dystopias
obj. 3 romance narrative
apocalypse and evolution |
|
Discussion Questions:
1. Continue comparisons with Genesis / Revelation.
How does
Lauren qualify as a "prophet?" Earthseed as
prophecy? Earthseed
community as
utopia? (cf.
heaven at end of
Revelation)
2. Discuss blending of
apocalypse and
evolution
in Parable of Sower (and later texts like Time Machine)
3. How are
both present? How account for
co-presence instead of co-exclusion?
4. Where do they diverge? Where do they meet? Can you reconcile seeing the world as
both
apocalypse and evolution, rather than one excluding the other? If so, how?
5. Broadly, how does
Parable of
the Sower succeed (or not) in making you care about the
future?
6.
Science fiction
and some
other forms of Literature of the Future do not age well.
Parable of the Sower is now 18 years old. How out of date is
it already? How much closer are we to its time-frame? If it
survives, why? What literary qualities make it somewhat timeless?
|
|
Tuesday, 11 June
Readings:
"Stone Lives"
(handout) and "Bears Discover Fire" (FP
17-28)
Discussion-starter:
Adria Weger
|
Agenda:
Science fiction; Time Machine
assignments
quiz
discussion: Adria
midterm preview
(>20 June) |
|
Discussion Questions:
1. What key
terms or ways of thinking signal
evolutionary premises? (consider: change, adaptation, survival + animal symbols)
2. What picture of humanity? What assumptions about the way the world, nature, time are
organized?
3. compare / contrast apocalyptic narrative
4. "Stone Lives" & "Bears" as high tech / low tech:
what different appeals?
5. "Stone Lives" our most
typical sci-fi story all semester--How? Discuss gender, picture of
world, and esp.
romance narrative
6. "Bears" as unusually
humorous sf story--how? What makes it
amusing? How does its narrative fit the definition of
comedy? |
|
Thursday, 13 June
Readings:
"Somebody up there Likes Me" (VN 208-237); begin
The
Time Machine (through ch. 5).
Discussion-starter:
Sera Perkins
Web-highlighter (midterms):
Tina Le
|
Agenda:
assignments /
alternative futures
midterm updates + topic discussion assignment
midterm web highlights: Tina
quiz
[break]
Time Machine / Somebody discussion: Sera |
|
Discussion Questions:
1. H.G.
Wells greatest sf writer: what qualities to style? What principles for
science fiction? What mix of science and
fiction?
2.
Time Machine written 1895, a generation after Darwin's
Origin of Species (1859): What signs
or terms of evolution in
Time
Machine?
3.
Evolution as
progress instead of
decline? How does
changing the time scale change the perception?
4. Identify
"Social Darwinism" (e.g., "survival of the fittest") with the
cultural or class developments in
Time Machine.
5. "Somebody up there . . . ": How is Wells's industrial-era
evolution updated to digital-era technology? + appeals of style |
|
Monday,
17 June
(transition from evolution to alternative futures)
Readings:
conclude
The Time Machine (ch. 6 through
epilogue);
Bruce Sterling & Lewis Shiner, "Mozart
in Mirrorshades" (handout)
Discussion-starter:
Rachel Jungklaus
Future-vision presenter:
Lea Suffron
|
Agenda:
midterm review; Essay 2 topic discussion
quiz
text
discussion: Rachel
Wells
[break]
"Mozart"
future-vision:
Lea |
Sphinx in Time Machine |
Discussion Questions:
Time Machine:
Conclude Evolution Section; continue questions
above +
1. conclusion of Eloi-Morlock story: apocalyptic or
evolutionary? How like a
romance?
2. Late in
novel, very deep future--what storytelling challenges? (evolution narrative)
3. Summarize science fiction style, problems or
issues with "classic science fiction." How does Wells survive
as "classic sf" when so little sf does?"Mozart in Mirrorshades":
Begin Alternative futures
1.
Look for key terms in quantum
& temporal physics: probability, time holes, parallel worlds
(i.e., alternative histories & futures)
2. alternative
futures--note figures of "branching" ("Garden of Forking
Paths")3. How does "Mozart in Mirrorshades" exemplify sf as a way to make a topic like
alternative futures friendly, non-threatening, or accessible to average readers
Midterm (Thurs.): Discuss Essay 2 topics
(personal-professional interests & applications)
on Tuesday |
|
|
Discussion Questions:
1. How successful is "Garden of Forking Paths" as
Literature
of Ideas? Compare "Gernsback" & "Half Past Eight"
1a. More specifically, how convincingly does it represent or make
you feel the possibility of
Alternative Futures?
2. Except in "Garden," observe scientific background for
alternative futures, esp. quantum physics as "probability"
3. What images of alternative futures, besides "Garden of
Forking Paths"---branching tree?
4. What attractions, repulsions to alternative futures,
compared to apocalyptic and evolutionary narratives?
5.
Discuss Midterm Essay 2 topics |
|
Thursday, 20 June:
midterm
assignment (instructor keeps office
hours; attendance not required; email midterms due by Friday
noon, 21 June) |
|
Monday, 24 June:
high-tech future, cyberpunk literature
Readings:
William Gibson,
"Johnny
Mnemonic" (BC); William Gibson,
"Burning Chrome" (BC 168-191);
Richard Goldstein, "The
Logical Legend of Heliopause and Cyberfiddle" (VN 159-180).
Future-vision presenter x 2:
Sera Perkins
google glass
|
Agenda:
midterm > final + office hours
assignments Why is great literature difficult?
science fiction
prsn:
Sera quiz
[break]
discussion
allusions
prsn: Sera |
|
Discussion Questions:
1. What like / dislike about cyberpunk and
why?1a. Attraction-repulsion of high-tech future?
Consider organic / non-organic; actual
/ virtual
reality.
2. How identify cyberpunk style? William
Gibson as "father / founder / leading stylist of
cyberpunk," influential sf style in past generation.
(associated terms: high-tech,
virtual reality, cyberspace)
3. What about Gibson's style makes literary
sorts acknowledge him as a real writer? (most sf writers are competent
but indifferent to style, more interested in ideas, action--cf. Bernstein,
"Logical Legend"). Pay special attention to
extended metaphor.
4. Problems with
cyberpunk?
|
|
Tuesday,
25 June:
low-tech: traces of
organic human nature and traditional culture in high tech world
Readings:
"The Onion and I," (VN 8-21)."Drapes and Folds,"
(VN 126-139)."Speech Sounds"(VN 91-108).
Discussion-starter:
Katasha DeRouen
Web-highlighter (final exams):
Sera Perkins
|
Agenda:
assignments;
utopia quiz
discussion: Katasha
science fiction web highlights: Sera |
|
Discussion Questions:
1. If you didn't like the cyberpunk / high-tech / virtual
realities stories, what alternative values or appeals do these
low-tech stories offer?
2. What
utopian / dystopian elements?
Identify different appeals
of low-tech and high-tech.
3. Contrast organic appeals of
low-tech with non-organic of high-tech.
4. What elements of
romance?
5. Octavia
Butler, author of Parable of the Sower, wrote "Speech
Sounds"—how might you recognize her style and subject matter?
(compare our discussions of Gibson) |
|
Thursday,
27 June: ecotopia
Readings:
K. S. Robinson, “Introduction” to
Future Primitive;
"Chocco" (FP
189-214);
"House of Bones" (FP
85-110)
Discussion-starter:
Ashley Sauceda
Future-vision presenter:
Tina Le
|
Agenda:
assignments; cosmos
quiz
Le Guin story in Future Primitive discuss readings
Chocco break + evaluations House of
Bones (Obj. 3; romance)
prsn: Tina |
|
Discussion Questions:
1.
What is
utopian
or potentially dystopian about
"ecotopia?"
2. Art or literature
"entertains and educates"
in a continuum: some
literature entertains more, some educates more; e.g.
didactic literature. Where do the two stories fall on this
spectrum?3. What are the urgencies
and difficulties of discussing
population, climate? Does science fiction provide a way to discuss?
What metaphors enable us to imagine a sustainable future?
4. Why is it difficult to write stories that
make people care for the environment? What inherent problems with
ecological literature?
-
ecology requires collective responsibility
for shared world with no escape--must avoid apocalypse
-
most stories require individual heroes and simple
solutions or escape; apocalypse no problem as long as someone else takes
the heat
|
|
|
Discussion Questions:
1. What issues about "our future in space"
do our readings raise?
2. What literary techniques make you
understand, care, and learn? (e.g.,
metaphor, allusion,
irony,
the sublime)
3. How does outer-space sf change our view of humanity
on earth? If humans and aliens represent
"the self and the other," what do
"they" reveal about "us?"
4. How successfully do the stories get beyond the "War of the
Worlds" model seen in Independence Day
or other standard "Earth vs. Aliens" movies in which aliens automatically
appear as apocalyptic terrorists?
General pop-culture questions:
5. Since aliens probably don't exist but are
constantly represented in popular culture, what purposes do they serve
for us? Why do we prefer stories about aliens to stories about our
environment?
6. What dimensions of time or the future do aliens
represent?
|
|
Tuesday, 2 July final exam
(in-class or
email); instructor holds office hours 9am-12noon; email exams due by Friday noon, 5 July.
Thursday,
4
July: No class meeting--Independence Day holiday |
|
Laura Miller, 2012 review of Elaine Pagels, Revelations
Nassim
Nicholas Taleb, "The Future will not be Cool"
"Chatter of Doomsday Makes
Beijing Nervous," New York Times 19 Dec. 2012
Michael Lind,
"Stop Pretending Cyberspace Exists," Salon.Com 12 Feb.
2013
"Why are Birthrates Falling
around the World? Blame Television."
Washington Post 13 May 2013
Hubble space telescope pictures
Maintained by: Craig White - whitec@uhcl.edu
Copyright © 1995 University of Houston - Clear Lake
2700 Bay Area Blvd.
Houston, TX 77058
|