|
LITR 5731 Multicultural Literature American Minority Literature cross-listed with CRCL 5931 |
|
|
|
|
Homepage & Syllabus Spring 2010 * T 7-9:50pm, Bayou 1435 Instructor: Craig White Office:
Bayou 2529-8 |
Assignments
midterm & research plan
research options
final exam |
|
|
|
|
|
Reading and Meeting Schedule: (spring 2010)
Tuesday, 19 January: Introductions, assignments. American Dream & Dr. King's "Dream" speech
Readings:
selection from Anzia Yezierska, Bread Givers (1925) (representing American Dream / Immigrant Narrative)
selections from The Declaration of Independence (1776)
selections from "I have a dream . . . " speech by Martin Luther King at March on Washington, 28 August 1963
African American literature
Tuesday, 26 January: begin slave narratives
Reading Assignments
The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American SlaveReading discussion leader: Ayme Christian
Poetry: Jupiter Hammon, "An Evening Thought: Salvation by Christ, with Penetential Cries"
Poetry reader / discussion leader: instructor
Instructor's Discussion Questions:
Is "the
Dream" (obj. 3a) a discernible narrative pattern? Identify elements in
examples, esp. Douglass's speech by the Chesapeake Bay (chapter 10). What
about actual dreams in Equiano and elsewhere?
How do slave narratives exemplify the
minority narrative (obj. 1a)? How different from the immigrant / American Dream
story?
Both
Douglass and Equiano come from pre-literate, traditional, rural cultures,
but are desperate to learn literacy, change their condition, and visit
cities. Identify these contrasting elements. Literary significance of
literacy? Culture
studies?
Douglass's Narrative is widely considered the greatest slave narrative and a classic text of American literature. What literary qualities can be identified for this distinction?
How do
Douglass’s language and culture/style swing from mainstream to minority?
Equiano visited mainland English
colonies only once (Philadelphia), otherwise a Caribbean slave; narrative
published London 1789 (year of US Constitution). How is his experience more
typical of a Caribbean slave than a southern US slave?
Manifestations of "the Color Code" in Equiano and Douglass?
Obj. 1d. “The Color Code”
Literature represents the extremely sensitive subject of skin color infrequently or indirectly.
Western civilization transfers values associated with “light and dark”—e. g., good & evil, rational / irrational—to people of light or dark complexions, with implications for power, validity, sexuality, etc.
This course mostly treats minorities as a historical phenomenon, but the biological or visual aspect of human identity may be more immediate and direct than history. People most comfortably interact with others who look like themselves or their family.
Skin color matters, but how much varies by circumstances.
Tuesday, 2 February: conclude slave narratives, begin Song of Solomon
Reading Assignments:
begin Toni Morrison, Song of Solomon, chapters 1 & 2 (through p. 55?); character family tree
Reading discussion leader (Incidents): Suzan Damas
Poetry: Langston Hughes, "Harlem (A Dream Deferred)"; "Dream Variations"
Poetry reader / discussion leader: Catherine Louvier
Instructor's Discussion Questions:
Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl
Song of Solomon
+ reaction to online readings
Tuesday, 9 February: continue Song of Solomon
Reading Assignments: Song of Solomon, chapters 3-9, pp. 56-216(?) (complete part 1, up to part 2)
Reading discussion leader: Laura Moseley
Web-highlight (research posts):
Poetry: Countee Cullen, "Incident" & "For a Poet"
Poetry reader / discussion leader: instructor
(Question for poems: Why is "Incident" more familiar from school anthologies and teaching than "For a Poet?" What values or challenges for minority literature follow?--see question above on relation between "literary" qualities and "minority" issues.)
Instructor's Discussion Questions:
Continue questions from 2 Feb:
Color Code? (obj. 1d)
Tuesday, 16 February: Conclude Song of Solomon
Reading Assignments: complete Song of Solomon (through part 2, through p. 337?)
Reading discussion leader: Christine Ford
Poetry: Maya Angelou, "Still I Rise"
Poetry reader / discussion leader: Denielle Alexander
(Suggested question for poem: How does it conform to The Dream? Dr. King's Dream Speech?)
Instructor's Discussion Questions:
American literary aesthetics remain powerfully influenced by Romanticism, which Modern / Postmodern writers like Morrison vary and challenge. 2 examples:
The wilderness gothic, in which the "maze" or "labyrinth" of the gothic space is projected onto nature. What variations when Milkman enters the forest to meet Pilate at the end?
The Romantic impulse to "escape" or "transcend": in Douglass, the "escape" blends Romantic and anti-slavery attitudes. In Song of Solomon, the impulse to escape is figured in the African American legend of the Flying Africans. How does Morrison both indulge the attractiveness of escape while questioning its social responsibility? How does the final image of Milkman's flight resolve (or fail to resolve) escape and responsibility?
Midterm & research plan due by email b/w Wednesday, 24 February & Monday, 1 March
Midterm & Research Plan Assignment
American Indian Literature
Tuesday, 23 February: American Indian Origin Stories; begin Black Elk Speaks
Reading Assignments:
North American Indian Origin Stories
Genesis (creation story)
Reading discussion leader: Omar Syed
begin Black Elk Speaks: chapters I-V (pp. 1-66); chapter VII (77-91). Also read any introductory material, esp. by Neihardt.
Reading discussion leader: Barbara Trevino
Instructor: Iroquois Great Law of Peace incl. Wampum
Instructor's Discussion Questions:
Overall questions: Why does America's dominant culture profess to admire Native Americans so much? Even bubbas dig Indians!
What to call American Indians? What is satisfied or frustrated with each term? What are the choices? Evaluate the choices.
(Spoiler: no single satisfactory answer . . . .)
Questions for Creation / Origin Stories: Identify & distinguish "earth-diver" & "emergence" narratives. Compare / contrast Genesis.
"How the White Man . . . ": obj. 1b: "using dominant culture’s words against them" & "conscience to dominant culture (which otherwise forgets the past)"
Questions for Black Elk Speaks: A first reaction to the text is the familiar pop-culture divide: righteous Indian culture, evil-ignorant white culture--but that pop-culture divide used to be righteous white culture, evil Indian culture.
How does Black Elk Speaks confirm yet complicate this simplistic narrative? What evidence of two voices (or more) in the narrative? (Reinhardt's voice as a late Romantic poet, Black Elk's voice as a shaman wishing to share his vision, and the repressed voice of Christianity as picked up by the Sioux)
How much is Indian life "Romanticized?" (Indian as noble savage, close to nature, etc.) Where does it escape Romanticizing?
Tuesday, 2 March: continue Black Elk Speaks
Reading Assignments:
Black Elk Speaks: chapters VII-XIII (pp. 92-161); chapter XVII-end including appendices (pp. 194-298); selections from The Black Elk Reader (handout)
Reading discussion leader: instructor
Poetry: Peter Blue Cloud, "Crazy Horse Monument"
Poetry reader / discussion leader: Samuel Mathis
Instructor's Discussion Topics:
Continue previous discussion of Black Elk as confirming / complicating simplifications
Obj. 3b. Native American Indian alternative narrative: "Loss and Survival"
spoken & written cultures
Tuesday, 9 March: Begin Love Medicine
Reading Assignments: Love Medicine through “A Bridge” (ends on p. 180)
Report: Louise Erdrich & Dartmouth College (confer w/ prof)
Reporter: Julie Garza (replaces discussion leader; may coordinate with research project, but not required)
Additional Reading: Kathleeen Walker Anderson, chapter 1 of creative thesis manuscript
Visitor: Kathleeen Walker Anderson from 2007 course, now MA candidate writing creative thesis on Cherokee
1. "Workshop" manuscript--that is, discuss strengths, issues, more of this or less of that . . .
2. Compare / contrast to course texts & objectives, esp. Erdrich
Instructor's Discussion Questions for Erdrich:
Black Elk Speaks 1932; Love Medicine 1984, 1993: What continuities? What has changed about American Indian literature? How discuss together?
Obj. 3b. Native American Indian alternative narrative: "Loss and Survival"
Erdrich in wave of recent ethnic women writers who balance wide popularity with critical respectability. How? Compare / contrast to popular & critically praised African American and Mexican American women writers (e. g. Maya Angelou, Sandra Cisneros, maybe Toni Morrison)
First Research Post due by Spring Break
Tuesday, 16 March:
spring holidays--no class meeting
Tuesday, 23 March: Conclude Love Medicine
Reading Assignments:
Love Medicine (complete)
Reading discussion leader: Deanna Scott
Poetry: Simon J. Ortiz, “The Margins Where We Live”
Poetry reader / discussion leader: Jennifer Huebenthal
Instructor's Discussion Questions:
Continue previous questions.
Gerry Nanapush as trickster?
Mexico in 1786
thanks to http://www.historyofwar.org/Maps/maps_mexican_war.html
Tuesday, 30 March: Guadalupe & Ultima
Reading Assignments:
Story of the Virgin of Guadalupe
Bless Me, Ultima through p. 105 or chapter Diez
Reading discussion leader: Rachel Risinger
Poetry: Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz, "You Men"
Poetry reader / discussion leader: Mallory Rogers (more biography than usual?)
Instructor's Discussion Questions:
"Guadalupe" as origins story of Mexico / Mexican America
What structures, conflicts, values? What human types?
Extend to Bless Me, Ultima
Tuesday, 6 April: conclude Bless Me, Ultima
Reading Assignments: Bless Me, Ultima (complete)
Reading discussion leader: Helena Suess
Poetry: Jimmy Santiago Baca, "Green Chile" or Louise Erdrich, “Indian Boarding School: The Runaways”
Poetry reader / discussion leader: Amy Sidle
name: Gloria Anzaldua
Tuesday, 13 April: begin Woman Hollering Creek
Reading Assignments: Sandra Cisneros, Woman Hollering Creek, through p. 83 (i. e., through “Never Marry a Mexican”)
Reading discussion leader: Melissa Garza
Poetry: Pat Mora, "Senora X No More"
Poetry reader / discussion leader: Tanya Stanley
Instructor's Discussion Questions:
Compare / contrast Bless Me, Ultima
Minority, immigrant, or new identity?--not to forget latina identity
Style: what doing with viewpoint? Border of 1st person & 3p limited
Compare Love Medicine: story collection or novel?
terms / names: retablo, La Malinche, Frida Kahlo
Completed Research Options Due 14-19 April:
2nd Research Post, Research Paper, or Research Journal
Tuesday, 20 April: conclude Cisneros, begin gay literature
Reading Assignments: Sandra Cisneros, Woman Hollering Creek (complete)
Reading discussion leader: Sarah McCall DeLaRosa
(Begin Gay Literature)
Poetry: Walt Whitman, "In Paths Untrodden"
Poetry reader / discussion leader: Juan Garcia
Poetry: W. H. Auden, "Lullabye"
Poetry reader / discussion leader: instructor
Instructor's Discussion Questions:
Discuss Cisneros's style: pleasures / frustrations
Ethnicity or gender?
gay poetry: how to speak the recently unspeakable (obj. 5 or obj. 2 on "double language"--cf. Jupiter Hammon, "An Evening Thought: Salvation by Christ, with Penetential Cries" )
Gay Literature
Tuesday, 27 April: The Best Little Boy in the World
Reading Assignments: The Best Little Boy in the World
Reading discussion leader: Barbara Trevino
Poetry: Frank O'Hara, "My Heart"
Poetry reader / discussion leader:
Instructor's Discussion Questions:
Gay community as alternative or mainstream?
gains / pains in
teaching gay lit?
Presence in minority literature? (cf. ethnic literature)
What literary strategies / problems unique to gay lit?
(obj. 5 or obj. 2 on "double language"--cf. Jupiter Hammon, "An Evening Thought: Salvation by Christ, with Penetential Cries" )
Tuesday, 4 May:
Final exam
Course Objectives:
(to be revised as semester progresses)
* * *
("Objectives" are the ideas and terms developed and reinforced throughout the semester in lectures, discussions, presentations, and examinations. In terms of learning outcomes, this course should enable you to explain these ideas and discuss minority literature in these terms.)
Objective
1
To define the “minority
concept" as a power relationship modeled by some ethnic groups’
historical relation to the dominant American culture.
1a.
“Involuntary (or forced)
participation”
(Unlike the dominant immigrant culture, ethnic minorities did
not choose to come to America or join its dominant culture. Thus the
original "social contract" of Native Americans and African Americans
contrasts with that of European Americans, Asian Americans, or most Latin
Americans, and the consequences of "choice" or "no choice"
echo down the generations.)
1b.
“Voiceless
and choiceless”
(Contrast the dominant culture’s self-determination or choice through
self-expression or voice, as in "The Declaration
of Independence.")
1c.
To observe alternative
identities and literary strategies developed by minority cultures and
writers to gain voice and choice:
· “double language” (same words, different meanings to different audiences)
· using the dominant culture’s words against them
· conscience to dominant culture (which otherwise forgets the past).
1d. “The Color Code”
Literature represents the extremely sensitive subject of skin color infrequently or indirectly.
Western civilization transfers values associated with “light and dark”—e. g., good & evil, rational / irrational—to people of light or dark complexions, with implications for power, validity, sexuality, etc.
This course mostly treats minorities as a historical phenomenon, but the biological or visual aspect of human identity may be more immediate and direct than history. People most comfortably interact with others who look like themselves or their family.
Skin color matters, but how much varies by circumstances.
Objective
2
To observe representations
and narratives (images and stories) of ethnicity
and gender as a means of defining minority categories.
2a. Is the status of women, lesbians, and homosexuals analogous to that of ethnic minorities in terms of voice and choice? Do "women of color" become "double minorities?"
2b.
To detect "class"
as a repressed subject of American discourse.
·
“You can tell you’re an American if you can’t talk about class.”
· American culture officially regards itself as "classless."
· Race and gender may replace class divisions of power, labor, or "place."
· Class may remain identifiable in signs or markers of power and prestige or their absence.
· High class status in the USA is often marked by plainness, simplicity, or lack of visibility.
2c. "Quick check" on minority status: What is the individual’s or group’s relation to the law or other dominant institutions? Does "the law" make things better or worse?
Objective
3
To compare and contrast the
dominant “American Dream” narrative—which involves voluntary
participation, forgetting the past, and privileging the individual—with alternative
narratives of American minorities, which involve involuntary participation,
connecting to the past, and traditional (extended) or alternative families.
Tabular
summary
of contrasts between the dominant culture's "American Dream" narrative
and minority narratives (still Objective
3)
Category
of comparison / dominant or minority |
"American
Dream" or immigrant narrative of dominant culture |
Minority
Narratives (not traditional immigrants) |
Cultural
group's original relation to USA |
Voluntary
participation (individual or ancestor chose to come to America) |
Involuntary
participation ("America" came to individual or ancestral
culture) |
Cultural
group's relation to time |
Modern
or revolutionary: Forget the past, leave it behind, get over it
(original act of immigration; future-oriented) |
Traditional
but disrupted: Reconnect to the past (not voluntarily abandoned;
more like a wound that needs healing) |
Social
structures |
Abandonment
of past context favors individual or nuclear family, erodes extended
social structures. |
Traditional
extended family shattered;
non-nuclear, "alternative," or improvised families survive. |
3a.
African American alternative narrative:
“The Dream”
3b.
Native American Indian alternative
narrative: "Loss and Survival"
3c.
Mexican
American narrative: “The Ambivalent Minority”
3a.
African American alternative narrative:
“The Dream”
("The Dream" resembles but is not identical to "The American
Dream." Whereas the American Dream emphasizes immediate individual success,
"the Dream" factors in setbacks, the need to rise again, and a quest
for group dignity.)
3b.
Native American Indian alternative
narrative: "Loss and Survival"
(Whereas immigrants define themselves by leaving the past behind in order to
get America, the Indians once had America but lost it along with many of their
people. Yet they defy the myth of "the vanishing Indian," instead
choosing to "survive," sometimes in faith that the dominant culture
will eventually destroy itself, and the forests and buffalo will return.)
3c.
Mexican
American narrative: “The Ambivalent Minority”
("Ambivalent" means having "mixed feelings" or
contradictory attitudes. Mexican Americans may exemplify immigrant culture as
individuals or families who come to America for economic gain but suffer social
dislocation. On the other hand, much of Mexico's historic experience with the
USA resembles the experience of the Native Americans: much of the United States,
including Texas, was once Mexico. Does a Mexican who moves from Juarez to El
Paso truly immigrate?)
Objective
4
To register the minority dilemma of assimilation or resistance—i. e., do you fight or join the culture that oppressed you? What balance do minorities strike between economic benefits and personal or cultural sacrifices?
4a. To identify the "new American" who crosses, combines, or confuses ethnic or gender identities (e. g., Tiger Woods, Halle Berry, Lenny Kravitz, Mariah Carey, K. D. Lang, Dennis Rodman, RuPaul, David Bowie)
4b. To distinguish the ideology of American racialism—which sees races as pure, separate, and permanent identities—from American practice, which always involves hybridity (or mixing) and change.
Tabular
summary of 4b
American
racial ideology (what dominant culture thinks or says) |
American
racial practice
(what
American culture actually does) |
Races or genders are pure and separate. |
Races always mix. What we call "pure" is only the latest change we're used to. |
Races and genders are permanent categories, perhaps allotted by God or Nature as a result of Creation, climate, natural selection, etc., |
Race & gender classifications or definitions constantly change or adapt; e. g., the Old South's quadroons, octaroons, "a single drop"; "crossing"; recent revisions of racial origins of Native America; Hispanic as "non-racial" classification; "bi-racial" |
Objective
5
To study the
influence of minority writers and speakers on literature, literacy, and
language.
5a. To discover the power of poetry and fiction to help "others" hear the minority voice and vicariously share the minority experience.
5b. To assess the status of minority writers in the "canon" of what is read and taught in schools (plus the criteria determining such status).
5c.
To regard
literacy as the primary code of modern existence
and
a key or path to empowerment.
5d. To note development and variations of standard English by minority writers and speakers and related issues of spoken & written cultures.
5e.
To emphasize how all speakers
and writers may use common
devices of human language to make poetry, including narrative, poetic
devices,
double language, and figures of speech.
5f.
To generalize the "Dominant-Minority"
relation to philosophical or syntactic categories of "Subject
& Object," in which the "subject"
is self-determining and active in terms of "voice and choice," while
the "object" is acted
upon, passive, or spoken for rather than acting and speaking.
Objective 6: Images of the individual, family, and alternative families in minority writings and experience
6a.
Generally speaking, minority
groups place more emphasis on “traditional” or “community” aspects of
human society, such as extended families or alternative families, and they
mistrust “institutions.” The dominant culture celebrates individuals and
nuclear families and identifies more with dominant-cultural institutions or its
representatives, like law enforcement officers, teachers, bureaucrats,
etc. (Much variation, though.)
6b. To question sacred modern concepts like "individuality" and "rights" and politically correct ideas like minorities as "victims"; to explore emerging postmodern identities, e. g. “biracial,” “global,” and “post-national.”
Objective
7
To survey
minority representations of the USA's “dominant” culture.
7a.
Primary definition:
"American Dream" or "Immigrant" culture.
7b. To observe shifting names or identities of the dominant culture in relation to different minority cultures:
(Tabular summary for Objective 7b)
Minority
category |
Corresponding designation for dominant culture |
"minority"
culture |
"majority,"
“mainstream,” "dominant" culture |
Involuntary participation |
Immigrant culture |
"Black" --- African American |
"White" --- European American |
Chicano, Hispanic, Mexican American (not identical terms) |
"Anglo" or North American |
Native American, American Indian, "Red Man"
|
"White man," European American, plus many local variants such as "Long Knives," "White Eyes," etc. |
“hyphenated American” (e. g., African-American, Mexican-American) |
"American" or "Real American" (frequently indicates European American) |
Woman, female, feminine, feminist |
man, male, macho, guys, etc. |
Gay, lesbian, homosexual, queer |
Straight, heterosexual, "breeders" |
Summer 2010 LITR 5731 Seminar in Multicultural Literature
"American Immigrant Literature"
M, T, Th 3-6pm, 1st 5-wks session
*************************************
Feedback for this webpage?
Contact Craig White at
whitec@uhcl.edu
or
281 283 3380