data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dce5/5dce51e54c03fbe715bb4d19810aa7b3413308cc" alt="" |
LITR 4340
American Immigrant Literature
Midterm1
assignment
1.
Essay on
immigrant &
minority
narratives
2.
Web highlights 3. Research
proposal
Official date:
4 March Email deadline:
midnight Tuesday 5 March
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc8aa/cc8aab1c3202b39bea0eb804c0d6acb36034f254" alt="" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acb7e/acb7e27cfffcf26b06e9a3c2f53debcf6f5d4777" alt="" |
(This webpage is the assignment
for our course's
first midterm, to be updated until 25 February, when paper copies will be
distributed.)
Format: Email.
Open-book, open-notebook.
No class meeting on 4 March but classroom available for students;
instructor keeps office hours 4-10.
Email exams
due to whiteC@uhcl.edu by
midnight Tuesday 5 March. "Submission window" is
26 February-5 March.
If your exam will be late, no automatic discredit if you communicate.
Email
your midterm1 submission to
whiteC@uhcl.edu.
(Most common mistake:
students
send to
“white” rather than “whiteC”)
·
Attach appropriate file(s) to an email for
whiteC@uhcl.edu.
(Microsoft Word or Rich Text Format works,)
and / or
· Copy
and paste contents of your essays into an email message to
whiteC@uhcl.edu
Acknowledgement of receipt:
Instructor usually replies that he's received your submission within a few hours
(unless you send it at an odd time).
If you don't see an email confirmation within 24 hours, check if you emailed the right address:
WhiteC@uhcl.edu.
Email problems?
A problem or two with email (or computers generally) is normal in a class this size. Don't panic—communicate
& we'll
work things out.
Spacing:
Single-spacing preferred.
No need to double-space, but OK if you do. All submissions are
converted to single-space for reading onscreen.
Return of grades, etc.:
Approximately 1-2 weeks after submission.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/350ba/350ba36cbcd56c7e8ba6cd88e4901099ca0b6753" alt=""
Contents:
3 parts ( Essay 1 & Research Report to
continue in midterm2 &
final exam, plus Web Highlights.
Part 1. Essay
defining immigrant identity, culture, or
narrative in comparison and contrast to minority
identity, culture, or narratives. (At least 7 paragraphs; references to 6 texts.)
Part 2. Web Highlights reviewing at
least three Model Assignments from
previous semesters (incl. at least one previous midterm1) (5+ paragraphs)
Part 3. Research Report
Topic proposal (for Research Report to be started on
Midterm2
and concluded in
final exam) (2 paragraphs.)
Special
requirement: All three parts
must have titles.
Advice: Draft Part 2 Web Highlights first
to familiarize yourself with standards, reinforce your learning, and provide models
for organization.
Special notes:
Section contents
may overlap or repeat materials, but be efficient; cross-reference to economize.
Confer with instructor any time regarding
any part of your midterm: Office: Bayou 2529-7; Phone: 281 283 3380;
Email: whitec@uhcl.edu
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/350ba/350ba36cbcd56c7e8ba6cd88e4901099ca0b6753" alt=""
Part 1.
Essay
defining immigrant identity, culture, or
narrative in comparison and contrast to minority
identity, culture, or narratives. (At least 7 paragraphs;
references to 6 texts.)
Essay 1 will be revised and extended to longer essays in Midterm2 and
Final Exam.
Use terms and themes from
Course Objectives, definitions from
term-webpages,
and historical backgrounds (Immigrant
narrative / culture / identity,
minority, African
Americans as Minority or Immigrant?,
American Indians
as minority)
to introduce and develop examples from readings and presentations of our texts
so far
as
minority or
immigrant. ("Model
minority"
and / or
dominant-culture are
optional.)
Compare and
contrast the
immigrant and
minority
identities and
narratives.
How do immigrants' and minorities' stories differ, and how do they respond differently to the USA
and assimilation? Where do
the
immigrant and
minority
stories connect or separate?
Optional approoach: Describe your learning process. What did you arrive
knowing or thinking about American
immigrants and
minorities? What have you
learned about these differing identities and their history from reading
immigrant and
minority
texts and surveying their distinct histories? How have literature
and iits various devices
helped or enabled this learning process? Provide text-examples from
immigrant and
minority
literature and history.
Refer to
Course Objectives, esp. Primary
objectives 1 & 2 and parts of Detailed Objectives 1-3.
Primary Objective 1. Evidence of
immigrant,
minority, or
dominant-culture identity, voice,
or narrative.
Primary Objective
2. Identification, definition,
application, &
analysis of
literary purposes, devices, or genres.
How do
immigrant and
minority
cultures relate
differently to the USA's
dominant culture, and why? How do
"Model Minority" immigrants
function as "ideal immigrants?"
Include discussion and definitions of assimilation
and resistance, possibly including
acculturation / selective
assimilation, and cite
examples from course readings. What different attitudes
toward assimilation among
immigrants and
minorities?
As
literature, what different
appeals do the
immigrant and
minority narratives make to readers? What different pleasures or purposes do readers find in
these distinct stories or profiles? How and why do readers—regardless of
their own particular ethnic identity—identify with these stories,
or not?
Optional: personal references:
Not required, but you may refer to your own backgrounds,
personal knowledge and experiences, and unique interpretations of the materials.
Relate to terms, themes, objectives.
Textual requirements: Refer to 6+
texts from course readings—mostly assigned readings but also poems presented in
class.
Of the 6 required texts, 2-4 should
exemplify the immigrant narrative and 2-4 should exemplify the minority
narrative.
Of the 6 texts, at least four
should be prose pieces from Imagining America
or
Immigrant Voices Vol. 2, fiction or nonfiction handouts,
or webpage texts. Two texts may be poems presented, or use all prose texts
if preferred.
Welcome to refer to quotes or ideas
from earlier midterms in Essay, but Web Highlights make this optional.
Also welcome to refer briefly (i.e. not extensively) to outside texts,
quotations, etc. These can always help but don't count as a substitute for
references to course readings.
Texts
available for essay
Immigrant texts (select,
describe, and analyze at least 2)
Immigrant fiction and nonfiction:
Anzia Yezierska, excerpt from
Bread Givers;
Anzia Yezierska, “Soap and Water”;
Nicholasa Mohr, “The English Lesson” (IA 21-34);
Anchee Min, from The
Cooked Seed (IV2 193-215);
Sui Sin Far, "In the Land of the Free" (IA
3-11); Gish Jen, “In the American Society” (IA
158-171);
Dr. Rose
Ihedigbo, from Sandals in the Snow (IV2 149-172);
J.
Christine Moon, "'What Color would you Like, Ma'am?"';
Le Ly Hayslip, from Child of War, Woman of Peace (IV2
105-125)
Immigrant poetry:
Joseph Papaleo, “American
Dream: First Report”;
Minority texts (select,
describe, and analyze at least 2)
Minority fiction and nonfiction:
Narrative of Olaudah Equiano, The African;
Toni Cade Bambara, “The Lesson” (IA 145-152);
Alice Walker, “Elethia” (IA 307-309;
Handsome
Lake, How the White Man Came to America; Leslie Marmon Silko, “The Man to
Send Rain Clouds” (IA 205-209); Louise Erdrich, "American Horse" (IA
210-220); Mei Mei Evans, “Gussuk” (IA 237-251)
Minority poetry:
Patricia Smith, “Blonde
White Women” ;
Chrystos, “I Have Not
Signed a Treaty with the United States Government"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/350ba/350ba36cbcd56c7e8ba6cd88e4901099ca0b6753" alt=""
Part 2.
Web Highlights:
Write an essay (introduction, body, conclusion) reviewing at least
3
student submissions from course website's
Model Assignments
(incl. at least one selection from a previous midterm1) (5+ paragraphs)
Purpose of assignment: To acquaint students with performance
standards*, with
immigrant and
minority
definitions, and use of texts as examples. (*All Model Assignments are
examples of good work, though in some cases they're more interesting than
exemplary. See
Evaluation standards
below.)
Write Part 2 as
an essay
with introduction and conclusion, not just a list of 3 items.
Unify your learning
experience. Compare and contrast
the three assignments you review.
Web Highlights essay must have a
title.
Requirements &
guidelines:
Review at least one midterm1 essay from
2018 Midterm1 Essays,
2016 Midterm1 Essays, or
2013 Midterm1 Essays.
Review at least one final research report from
2018 final research reports,
2016 final research reports,
or
2013 final
research reports.
Your third item may be another midterm1 essay, another final research
report, or any other submission on
Model Assignments
(including previous Web Highlights).
“Review”: Describe what interested you, why you
chose it,
and what you learned. You may criticize what you found, but not required.
To identify passages, copy and paste brief selections into your web review
or refer to them using
names, locations, paraphrases, summaries, and brief quotes. (Both options in models.) Either way,
highlight and
discuss language used in the passages as part of
your commentary.
What did you learn from reviewing model assignments that you
didn't learn from in-class instruction?
Requirement:
Write your Web Highlights as an essay, not just a list of 3 items.
Note on organization and grading: Some students fulfill assignment by going
through 3 assignments individually, one at a time until finished, with few or no connections between the separate models.
Better submissions unify the three reviews into a whole, purposeful essay in
which the learning experience of one review connects to the learning experience
of another, and your entire learning experience is previewed and
summarized in the essay's introduction and conclusion.
Successful submissions sometimes start by identifying a subject of special interest, then choosing Model Assignments that meet
this interest.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/350ba/350ba36cbcd56c7e8ba6cd88e4901099ca0b6753" alt=""
Part
3. Write a
proposal for your
Research Report
Topic (to
be developed in Midterm2 and completed as part of
Final Exam).
Model Assignments of
2018 Research Proposals,
2016 Research Proposals &
2013 Research Proposals.
(Nearly all of these are shorter than what I assign, but obviously some give
more to work with.)
Assignment: Write
2 paragraphs of 3-5 sentences
identifying your probable topic for a research report. Why did you choose this
topic?
What do you already know? What do you want to learn? How will you find out?
End your proposal with a question for the instructor.
If you're stuck between 2-3 subjects, describe
situation—instructor will help. (Your question may concern your choice.)
You can change your subject, or your subject
can evolve as you do research. If your subject changes completely,
clear with instructor. If your subject evolves but stays more or less the same,
no need to clear with instructor. As part of your research report, you can write about how your subject
changed. (That is, how your subject or interests evolved can
be part of the learning experience you describe.)
Nature of assignment: Your research
report is not a typical literary essay in which you analyze the language, form,
or meaning of individual texts. Instead, your topic must concern a factual
or historical figure, phenomenon, or movement in literature or culture.
Put another way, your report will find research
about a literary or cultural topic and summarize what you learned about
your subject of interest.
Research requirements: Mention at least
one research source relevant to your topic that you may use; even better if you
report what you've learned from that source so far.
Range of subjects: You have
considerable freedom to choose, but anyone reading your proposal should immediately
recognize its relevance to a class on immigrant literature and
multicultural identity.
Look across the whole semester for
possibilities—you're not limited to what we've covered so far.
Warning: The only recurrent
mistakes are that some students propose
pure
minority
topics
that didn’t have anything to do with immigration or the immigrant narrative.
This course doesn’t exclude minority
literature, but such a topic is more
appropriate for our
American Minority Literature
course. You can involve m
identities and narratives, but they must relate to Immigrant literature or
identity in some direct and obvious way.
Possibilities for topics
(there are others—these are just to help you start thinking):
Literature
of an immigrant group—e.
g. Chinese-American, Mexican-American, Turkish-American—the possibilities
are innumerable.
History
of a particular immigrant
group and / or some literary or cultural movements or achievements associated with them.
An immigrant or ethnic group that
mixes immigrant and minority traditions, e. g.
New-World Immigrants like Haitians, Jamaicans, or other
Afro-Caribbeans; Dominicans; Mexican Americans?
A
particular immigrant writer, e. g. Gish Jen, Frank McCourt, Sandra Cisneros, Henry Roth,
Anzia Yezierska, Richard Rodriguez. (Career review + bibliography of major
writings.)
An
immigrant-literature-related topic of a more formal literary nature
focusing on narrative, language issues, publishing challenges, etc.
Laws or agencies involving immigration
Related issues like refugee status, human trafficking, etc.
Immigrant issues related to education (Course
Objective #6)
Gender issues resulting from immigration,
assimilation,
or acculturation.
The main thing is to choose a
topic you care about and want to learn about and share.
To get a sense of this report’s
possibilities, look at previous models on
Model Assignments.
No problem if
you repeat an assignment—in fact, you may use previous research reports as
sources for your own research requirements.
Response to Research Proposal
When your midterm-submission email is
received, instructor will directly read your proposal and reply-email a response.
Student does not receive a letter grade for the proposal, only a “yes” or instructions for
receiving a yes. Students don't lose credit for problems reaching a
topic as long as they are working on it.
The
only way to get in trouble over proposal is
by not doing enough, i.e., if you simply don’t offer much
to work with, especially after prompts from instructor.
A bad
proposal is one sentence starting, “I’m thinking about . . . ” and
ending “ . . . something to do with immigration and gender.” Then, “What do you think?” In these cases, a bad grade isn’t
recorded, but notes regarding the paper proposal may appear on the Final
Grade Report.
In other words, a few students obviously don't think
about this topic until the last minute when the midterm is due, then send in
a few nearly-empty sentences. Instructor
can't act like that's acceptable, but you can recover.
Requirements: at least 2 paragraphs of 3-5 sentences each; at least one research
reference.
Instructor welcomes inquiries on possible topics before Midterm1. Email, phone,
confer in person.
Future developments:
Midterm2: 4-5 paragraphs describing your research and learning
so far on your topic and how it relates to American Immigrant Literature.
Final Exam: 8-10 paragraph report summarizing your research and
learning on your topic and how it relates to our course.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/350ba/350ba36cbcd56c7e8ba6cd88e4901099ca0b6753" alt=""
General grading standards:
Readability, competence levels, content quantity and quality, and thematic unity.
Readability & surface competence: Your
reader must be able to process what you're reporting. Some rough edges are acceptable, but chronic errors or
elementary style limit quality.
Review & edit
your midterm before submitting. Don't make instructor
write, "You expected me to read your midterm when you didn't even read it
yourself?"
Content
quantity and quality:
Evidence of learning, esp. understanding of terms and application to texts.
Coverage and analysis of required texts.
Use of course resources
including instructional webpages
(esp. for terms) + materials from class
discussion and lecture.
Interest & significance: Make your reader
want to process your
essays by making the information meaningful to our study of
literature and culture.
Thematic
unity / organization: Unify materials along
a line of thought that a reader can follow from start to finish.
Dr. White's
Instructional Materials
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84cbb/84cbb01e516f184431fd6a94f3cd8bfbfd66129a" alt=""