“Minority” in everyday American speech, government, and multicultural studies
loosely describes any
ethnic or
gender group that is either non-white, non-male, or
non-heterosexual. "Minority" rarely describes lower socio-economic classes, though the
categories of class and race or ethnicity often overlap
in casual use.
This instructor's
multicultural courses impose more
specific and quantifiable meanings, but, as with all language, meanings shift with
contexts and evolve with changing times.
Three categories—historical; physical or cosmetic; and socioeconomic or class
behaviors or values—identify American minorities:
particular ethnic groups' historical
experience, esp.
involuntary contact, exploitation, and deprivation instead of opportunity and
freedom (as with
immigrants).
distinguishing physical
markers including the
color code,
dress codes, speech differences, etc.
socioeconomic or class behaviors or values
that the dominant culture regards as distasteful or counter-productive but which
may affirm minority identity if only as resistance or not selling out
to the culture that has historically oppressed and despised you.
These three aspects are explained & detailed further down, but for
American Minority Literature &
American Immigrant Literature,
the following table provides ready prompts for its objective & presentation
requirements for identifying
minority identity or voice. (Students may choose any prompts from any
column.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/350ba/350ba36cbcd56c7e8ba6cd88e4901099ca0b6753" alt=""
minority historical experience |
minority
physical
or visual markers |
socioeconomic or class behaviors or values
(i.e., these may be class-determined more than
ethnic or
race-based) |
involuntary contact
with
dominant culture
(conquest, captivity, kidnapping, forced sexual contact):
contrast with immigrant narrative
"Voiceless & choiceless" in speaking for themselves and rights
over self and property (in contrast to choice involved in
immigrant narrative or privilege of
dominant culture)
Exploitation, isolation and disadvantage, instead of
immigrants' opportunity, freedom
(mobility), and advantage.
Resistance to
assimilation to historically oppressive
dominant culture (in contrast to
immigrant identity, which voluntarily joins
dominant culture
social contract).
"Resistance" may be partial, leading to mixed or hybrid identities, or syncretism
(>)
"Resistance" may also rise from dominant culture
Occasional legal or political relief but continuing institutional or
cultural exclusion.
|
race / ethnicity
“The Color Code”
dress codes
body styles, facial features
voice prompts
(dialects, accents, vocal styles)
marked / unmarked
washed /
unwashed; clean / unclean
naming
practices
syncretism (blending
of religious traditions) (esp.
religious symbols)
For
immigrants who intermarry and
assimilate, such differences
gradually diminish;
for minorities who remain separate
or resist
assimilation,
differences
may persist as points of pride or identity.
|
traditional culture v. modern culture
extended, non-nuclear, or improvised family, often dysfunctional or broken
("Red
Families v. Blue Families")
traditional gender roles, esp. male privilege and womanly submission;
early child-bearing, "age at first birth" or "age of family formation"
short childhoods, early maturation, need to work for family
(contrast dominant culture)
escapist
behaviors like drugs, alcohol, gambling
intersectionality of race / ethnicity, class, gender
spoken culture v. written culture
exclusion / objectification (self-other)
mistrust,
resistance, or cynicism toward
dominant-culture authorities,
especially law-enforcement
absence of
successful models in business, law, education, etc.
receipt of government aid, e.g. welfare, food stamps, community food
banks, etc.
association with crime or excessive police force (respect
for
dominant-culture
authority?)
|
For specific histories of racial / ethnic groups described as enduring
minorities:
Why are minority and multicultural issues so persistent and powerful in American culture and
identity?
History vs. ideals:
The Declaration of Independence proclaims
that "all men are created equal" with "inalienable rights" of "life, liberty,
and the pursuit of happiness," but the same document and the
U.S. Constitution
identify American Indians and African Americans as outside this status,
reflecting the USA's original sins of taking
American Indian land and kidnapping Africans as slave labor.
Social structures: The
Declaration's proclamation of "equality"
and the American Dream of socio-economic mobility imply that the USA is a
classless society, in contrast to Old-World European societies that were
largely structured by class.
In America,
race and gender assume the structuring
identities formerly assumed by class. "Everybody knows their place." (In fact,
class continues to be, and is increasing as, a factor in American society.
European societies now have more social mobility than American society.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/350ba/350ba36cbcd56c7e8ba6cd88e4901099ca0b6753" alt=""
Other ethnic groups that may trend to minority status
(sometimes called "downward assimilation," in which people gravitate to the most
dangerous aspects of American culture like cynicism, despair, escapism,
get-rich-quick schemes, crime, and other "symptoms" listed above.)
Scotch-Irish or White heartland Americans
left behind economically by
globalization and de-industrialization
aversion to government and public
education and / or higher education
disdain
for outsiders or other cultures leading to social isolation (including lack of
continuing migration or "rootedness" in contrast to "rootlessness" of
trans-national immigrants)
maintenance of traditional gender roles and extended families despite
nuclear-family breakdown through divorce, lower marriage rates, early
child-bearing ("age at first birth").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/88d5f/88d5ff571f25475cdc755f24de2b7c02501ebf8d" alt=""