| |
George Orwell
Shooting an Elephant
1936 |
George Orwell (b. Eric Arthur Blair, 1903-1950) |
|
George Orwell is best-known for
the dystopian-allegorical novels
Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949) and
Animal Farm
(1945), which remain staples of secondary and college reading lists.
Orwell also endures as a writer and thinker with wide appeal. Both
conservative and liberal commentators cite him as an incisive
authority, sympathetic to the down and out but skeptical of
official tyranny.
Two texts by Orwell feature prominently in colonial
and postcolonial literature, both critical of imperialism in
Orwell's understated or ironical style:
Burmese Days (1934, 1935), Orwell's first novel, is a fictional
representation of events during the author's five years as a police
officer in Burma (now renamed Myanmar), which was then part of India and
the British Empire. "Shooting an Elephant"
(1936) . . .
(see below) Colonized by the British in the 1800s, Burma gained
independence as a separate nation in 1948, when the British colony of
India was partitioned to West Pakistan (now Pakistan), India, East
Pakistan (now Bangladesh), and Burma. A military junta officially ruled
Burma from 1962 to 2010, when free elections were held, though the
military maintains oppressive influence.
In 1989 the military government officially changed
the nation's name from Burma to Myanmar, but either name remains
contested. |
Myanmar colored red, formerly known as Burma |
The British Empire included parts of present-day
Myanmar as part of colonial India—see below. |
Discussion questions:
1. As formal genre, how does the personal essay resemble or vary from
the novel or
fiction? 2. How does
Orwell's essay indicate or symbolize the "self-other"
in terms of Europe and "East?" Where and how successfully are these symbolic
divisions crossed, and how? What symbols (or sets of symbols) include both self
and other?
3. If colonial literature posits the "self" as European "white man" and the "other"
as
Eastern, Oriental, Asian, or non-European "natives," how do the two different parties appear
to and affect each other? (Put another way, how much does non-verbal social
pressure effect a dialogue?)
4. How does the narrator both criticize and exemplify
"Imperialism?" The narrator diffidently fills the role of the savior /
oppressor of colonial / postcolonial fiction. How does the narrator exceed or
vary this characterization? Consider irony.
5. What does the rifle signify in the European-Eastern
dialogue? Preview effect of Crusoe's rifle on Friday.
Shooting an Elephant
(1936)
[1]
In Moulmein, in lower Burma, I was hated by large numbers of people—the only
time in my life that I have been important enough for this to happen to me. I
was sub-divisional police officer of the town, and in an
aimless, petty kind of
way anti-European feeling was very bitter. No one had the guts to raise a riot,
but if a European woman went through the bazaars alone somebody would probably
spit betel juice over her dress. As a police officer I was an obvious target and
was baited whenever it seemed safe to do so. When a nimble Burman tripped me up
on the football [soccer] field and the referee (another Burman) looked the other way, the
crowd yelled with hideous laughter. This happened more than once. In the end the
sneering yellow faces of young men that met me everywhere, the insults hooted
after me when I was at a safe distance, got badly on my nerves. The young
Buddhist priests were the worst of all. There were several thousands of them in
the town and none of them seemed to have anything to do except stand on street
corners and jeer at Europeans.
[2]
All this was perplexing and upsetting. For
at that time I had already made up my mind that imperialism was an evil thing
and the sooner I chucked up my job and got out of it the better.
Theoretically—and secretly, of course—I was all for the Burmese and all against
their oppressors, the British. As for the job I was doing, I hated it more
bitterly than I can perhaps make clear. In a job like that you see the dirty
work of Empire at close quarters. The wretched prisoners huddling in the
stinking cages of the lock-ups, the grey, cowed faces of the long-term convicts,
the scarred buttocks of the men who had been flogged with bamboos—all these
oppressed me with an intolerable sense of guilt. But I could get nothing into
perspective. I was young and ill-educated and I had had to think out my problems
in the utter silence that is imposed on every Englishman in the East. I did not
even know that the British Empire is dying, still less did I know that it is a
great deal better than the younger empires that are going to supplant it. All I
knew was that I was stuck between my hatred of the empire I served and my rage
against the evil-spirited little beasts who tried to make my job impossible.
With one part of my mind I thought of the British Raj as an unbreakable tyranny,
as something clamped down, in saecula saeculorum [forever
and ever], upon the will of prostrate
peoples; with another part I thought that the greatest joy in the world would be
to drive a bayonet into a Buddhist priest's guts. Feelings like these are the
normal by-products of imperialism; ask any Anglo-Indian official, if you can
catch him off duty.
[3] One day
something happened which in a roundabout way
was enlightening. It was a tiny incident in itself, but it gave me a better
glimpse than I had had before of the real nature of imperialism—the real motives
for which despotic governments act. Early one morning the sub-inspector at a
police station the other end of the town rang me up on the phone and said that
an elephant was ravaging the bazaar. Would I please come and do something about
it? I did not know what I could do, but I wanted to see what was happening and I
got on to a pony and started out. I took my rifle, an old 44 Winchester and much
too small to kill an elephant, but I thought the noise might be useful in
terrorem [warning]. Various Burmans stopped me on the way and told me about the elephant's
doings. It was not, of course, a wild elephant, but a tame one which had gone
"must." [<musth or rut] It had been chained up, as tame elephants always are when their attack
of "must" is due, but on the previous night it had broken its chain and escaped.
Its mahout [driver], the only person who could manage it when it was in that state, had
set out in pursuit, but had taken the wrong direction and was now twelve hours'
journey away, and in the morning the elephant had suddenly reappeared in the
town. The Burmese population had no weapons and were quite helpless against it.
It had already destroyed somebody's bamboo hut, killed a cow and raided some
fruit-stalls and devoured the stock; also it had met the municipal rubbish van
and, when the driver jumped out and took to his heels, had turned the van over
and inflicted violences upon it.
[4]
The Burmese sub-inspector and some
Indian constables were waiting for me in the quarter where the elephant had been
seen. It was a very poor quarter, a labyrinth of squalid bamboo huts, thatched
with palmleaf, winding all over a steep hillside. I remember that it was a
cloudy, stuffy morning at the beginning of the rains
[monsoon season]. We began questioning the
people as to where the elephant had gone and, as usual, failed to get any
definite information. That is invariably the case in the East; a story always
sounds clear enough at a distance, but the nearer you get to the scene of events
the vaguer it becomes. Some of the people said that the elephant had gone in one
direction, some said that he had gone in another, some professed not even to
have heard of any elephant. I had almost made up my mind that the whole story
was a pack of lies, when we heard yells a little distance away. There was a
loud, scandalized cry of "Go away, child! Go away this instant!" and an old
woman with a switch in her hand came round the corner of a hut, violently
shooing away a crowd of naked children. Some more women followed, clicking their
tongues and exclaiming; evidently there was something that the children ought
not to have seen. I rounded the hut and saw a man's dead body sprawling in the
mud. He was an Indian, a black Dravidian coolie [South
Indian laborer], almost naked, and he could not
have been dead many minutes. The people said that the elephant had come suddenly
upon him round the corner of the hut, caught him with its trunk, put its foot on
his back and ground him into the earth. This was the rainy season and the ground
was soft, and his face had scored a trench a foot deep and a couple of yards
long. He was lying on his belly with arms crucified and head sharply twisted to
one side. His face was coated with mud, the eyes wide open, the teeth bared and
grinning with an expression of unendurable agony. (Never tell me, by the way,
that the dead look peaceful. Most of the corpses I have seen looked devilish.)
The friction of the great beast's foot had stripped the skin from his back as
neatly as one skins a rabbit. As soon as I saw the dead man I sent an orderly to
a friend's house nearby to borrow an elephant rifle. I had already sent back the
pony, not wanting it to go mad with fright and throw me if it smelt the
elephant.
[5] The orderly came back in a few minutes with a rifle and five
cartridges, and meanwhile some Burmans had arrived and told us that the elephant
was in the paddy fields below, only a few hundred yards away. As I started
forward practically the whole population of the quarter flocked out of the
houses and followed me. They had seen the rifle and were all shouting excitedly
that I was going to shoot the elephant. They had not shown much interest in the
elephant when he was merely ravaging their homes, but it was different now that
he was going to be shot. It was a bit of fun to them, as it would be to an
English crowd; besides they wanted the meat. It made me vaguely uneasy. I had no
intention of shooting the elephant—I had merely sent for the rifle to defend
myself if necessary—and it is always unnerving to have a crowd following you. I
marched down the hill, looking and feeling a fool, with the rifle over my
shoulder and an ever-growing army of people jostling at my heels. At the bottom,
when you got away from the huts, there was a metalled
[gravel] road and beyond that a
miry waste of paddy fields a thousand yards across, not yet ploughed but soggy
from the first rains and dotted with coarse grass. The elephant was standing
eight yards from the road, his left side towards us. He took not the slightest
notice of the crowd's approach. He was tearing up bunches of grass, beating them
against his knees to clean them and stuffing them into his mouth.
[6] I had
halted on the road. As soon as I saw the elephant I knew with perfect certainty
that I ought not to shoot him. It is a serious matter to shoot a working
elephant—it is comparable to destroying a huge and costly piece of machinery—and
obviously one ought not to do it if it can possibly be avoided. And at that
distance, peacefully eating, the elephant looked no more dangerous than a cow. I
thought then and I think now that his attack of "must"
[rut] was already passing off;
in which case he would merely wander harmlessly about until the mahout [driver] came back
and caught him. Moreover, I did not in the least want to shoot him. I decided
that I would watch him for a little while to make sure that he did not turn
savage again, and then go home.
[7]
But at that moment I glanced round at the
crowd that had followed me. It was an immense crowd, two thousand at the least
and growing every minute. It blocked the road for a long distance on either
side. I looked at the sea of yellow faces above the garish clothes—faces all
happy and excited over this bit of fun, all certain that the elephant was going
to be shot. They were watching me as they would watch a conjurer about to
perform a trick. They did not like me, but with the magical rifle in my hands I
was momentarily worth watching. And suddenly I realized that I should have to
shoot the elephant after all. The people expected it of me and I had got to do
it; I could feel their two thousand wills pressing me forward, irresistibly. And
it was at this moment, as I stood there with the rifle in my hands, that I first
grasped the hollowness, the futility of the white man's dominion in the East.
Here was I, the white man with his gun, standing in front of the unarmed native
crowd—seemingly the leading actor of the piece; but in reality I was only an
absurd puppet pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind. I
perceived in this moment that when the white man turns tyrant it is his own
freedom that he destroys. He becomes a sort of hollow, posing dummy, the
conventionalized figure of a sahib [Urdu "sir" for
addressing Europeans; cf. Swahili Bwana]. For it is the condition of his rule that he
shall spend his life in trying to impress the "natives," and so in every crisis
he has got to do what the "natives" expect of him. He wears a mask, and his face
grows to fit it. I had got to shoot the elephant. I had committed myself to
doing it when I sent for the rifle. A sahib has got to act like a sahib; he has
got to appear resolute, to know his own mind and do definite things. To come all
that way, rifle in hand, with two thousand people marching at my heels, and then
to trail feebly away, having done nothing—no, that was impossible. The crowd
would laugh at me. And my whole life, every white man's life in the East, was
one long struggle not to be laughed at.
[8]
But I did not want to shoot the
elephant. I watched him beating his bunch of grass against his knees, with that
preoccupied grandmotherly air that elephants have. It seemed to me that it would
be murder to shoot him. At that age I was not squeamish about killing animals,
but I had never shot an elephant and never wanted to. (Somehow it always seems
worse to kill a large animal.) Besides, there was the beast's owner to be
considered. Alive, the elephant was worth at least a hundred pounds; dead, he
would only be worth the value of his tusks, five pounds, possibly. But I had got
to act quickly. I turned to some experienced-looking Burmans who had been there
when we arrived, and asked them how the elephant had been behaving. They all
said the same thing: he took no notice of you if you left him alone, but he
might charge if you went too close to him.
[9] It was perfectly clear to me
what I ought to do. I ought to walk up to within, say, twenty-five yards of the
elephant and test his behavior. If he charged, I could shoot; if he took no
notice of me, it would be safe to leave him until the mahout
[elephant-driver] came back. But also
I knew that I was going to do no such thing. I was a poor shot with a rifle and
the ground was soft mud into which one would sink at every step. If the elephant
charged and I missed him, I should have about as much chance as a toad under a
steam-roller. But even then I was not thinking particularly of my own skin, only
of the watchful yellow faces behind. For at that moment, with the crowd watching
me, I was not afraid in the ordinary sense, as I would have been if I had been
alone. A white man mustn't be frightened in front of "natives"; and so, in
general, he isn't frightened. The sole thought in my mind was that if anything
went wrong those two thousand Burmans would see me pursued, caught, trampled on
and reduced to a grinning corpse like that Indian up the hill. And if that
happened it was quite probable that some of them would laugh. That would never
do.
[10] There was only one alternative. I shoved the cartridges into the
magazine and lay down on the road to get a better aim. The crowd grew very
still, and a deep, low, happy sigh, as of people who see the theatre curtain go
up at last, breathed from innumerable throats. They were going to have their bit
of fun after all. The rifle was a beautiful German thing with cross-hair sights.
I did not then know that in shooting an elephant one would shoot to cut an
imaginary bar running from ear-hole to ear-hole. I ought, therefore, as the
elephant was sideways on, to have aimed straight at his ear-hole, actually I
aimed several inches in front of this, thinking the brain would be further
forward.
[11] When I pulled the trigger I did not hear the bang or feel the
kick—one never does when a shot goes home—but I heard the devilish roar of glee
that went up from the crowd. In that instant, in too short a time, one would
have thought, even for the bullet to get there, a mysterious, terrible change
had come over the elephant. He neither stirred nor fell, but every line of his
body had altered. He looked suddenly stricken, shrunken, immensely old, as
though the frightful impact of the bullet had paralysed him without knocking him
down. At last, after what seemed a long time—it might have been five seconds, I
dare say—he sagged flabbily to his knees. His mouth slobbered. An enormous
senility seemed to have settled upon him. One could have imagined him thousands
of years old. I fired again into the same spot. At the second shot he did not
collapse but climbed with desperate slowness to his feet and stood weakly
upright, with legs sagging and head drooping. I fired a third time. That was the
shot that did for him. You could see the agony of it jolt his whole body and
knock the last remnant of strength from his legs. But in falling he seemed for a
moment to rise, for as his hind legs collapsed beneath him he seemed to tower
upward like a huge rock toppling, his trunk reaching skyward like a tree.
He
trumpeted, for the first and only time. And then down he came, his belly towards
me, with a crash that seemed to shake the ground even where I lay.
[12] I got
up. The Burmans were already racing past me across the mud. It was obvious that
the elephant would never rise again, but he was not dead. He was breathing very
rhythmically with long rattling gasps, his great mound of a side painfully
rising and falling. His mouth was wide open—I could see far down into caverns of
pale pink throat. I waited a long time for him to die, but his breathing did not
weaken. Finally I fired my two remaining shots into the spot where I thought his
heart must be. The thick blood welled out of him like red velvet, but still he
did not die. His body did not even jerk when the shots hit him, the tortured
breathing continued without a pause. He was dying, very slowly and in great
agony, but in some world remote from me where not even a bullet could damage him
further. I felt that I had got to put an end to that dreadful noise. It seemed
dreadful to see the great beast Lying there, powerless to move and yet powerless
to die, and not even to be able to finish him. I sent back for my small rifle
and poured shot after shot into his heart and down his throat. They seemed to
make no impression. The tortured gasps continued as steadily as the ticking of a
clock.
[13] In the end I could not stand it any longer and went away. I heard
later that it took him half an hour to die. Burmans were bringing dash and
baskets even before I left, and I was told they had stripped his body almost to
the bones by the afternoon.
[14]
Afterwards, of course, there were endless
discussions about the shooting of the elephant. The owner was furious, but he
was only an Indian and could do nothing. Besides, legally I had done the right
thing, for a mad elephant has to be killed, like a mad dog, if its owner fails
to control it. Among the Europeans opinion was divided. The older men said I was
right, the younger men said it was a damn shame to shoot an elephant for killing
a coolie, because an elephant was worth more than any damn Coringhee coolie
[laborer from town of Coringa in southern India]. And
afterwards I was very glad that the coolie had been killed; it put me legally in
the right and it gave me a sufficient pretext for shooting the elephant. I often
wondered whether any of the others grasped that I had done it solely to avoid
looking a fool.
Indian Elephant
article comparing Berkeley
police pepper-spray incident to "Shooting an Elephant"
|