American speech may refer to Mexican Americans as 
either
immigrant or 
minority without 
making our course's distinctions between these terms. 
In this case 
everyone may be right, as Mexican Americans in the USA
may combine 
immigrant and 
minority narratives 
or identities, or they develop a new type of ethnic 
identity that exceeds or varies these familiar divisions.
Mexican 
Americans as 
immigrants 
Popular American culture and media see Mexican 
Americans as 
immigrants through discussion of border 
security, documentation issues, demographics, and 
potential political 
impacts.
Justification of Mexican 
Americans as 
immigrants: 
 For 
centuries Mexican 
people have continually crossed and recrossed a shifting border between Mexico 
and the USA.
 For 
centuries Mexican 
people have continually crossed and recrossed a shifting border between Mexico 
and the USA.
 Mexican 
immigrants make up the largest group of current immigrants to America (though 
current rates of Asian immigration are higher).
 Mexican 
immigrants make up the largest group of current immigrants to America (though 
current rates of Asian immigration are higher).
 Mexican 
Americans face many challenges similar to other 
immigrant groups, e.g. assimilation to a new 
language and culture, generational change, availability of well-funded public schools, culture shock, 
nostalgia, etc.
 Mexican 
Americans face many challenges similar to other 
immigrant groups, e.g. assimilation to a new 
language and culture, generational change, availability of well-funded public schools, culture shock, 
nostalgia, etc.

Mexican 
Americans as
minorities 
 Mexican 
Americans in the Southwestern U.S. were once conquered and dispossessed like 
American Indians and are thus a 
minority, so that
 Mexican 
Americans in the Southwestern U.S. were once conquered and dispossessed like 
American Indians and are thus a 
minority, so that 
 When Mexican Americans immigrate to states like Texas, California, Arizona, New 
Mexico and Nevada, their identity as immigrants is complicated by the fact that 
these lands once belonged to Mexico. (See 
Mexican-American War, 1846-48)
 
When Mexican Americans immigrate to states like Texas, California, Arizona, New 
Mexico and Nevada, their identity as immigrants is complicated by the fact that 
these lands once belonged to Mexico. (See 
Mexican-American War, 1846-48)
 The nearness of the Mexican border with the United States may mean less 
detachment from their home country for Mexican Americans, potentially leading to 
mixed attitudes toward assimilation.
 
The nearness of the Mexican border with the United States may mean less 
detachment from their home country for Mexican Americans, potentially leading to 
mixed attitudes toward assimilation.
 Proximity to the USA has exposed Mexican Americans, like other
New World immigrants, to political, economic, 
and cultural aspects of American society  making them careful of negatively
assimilating to family breakdown, women's 
rights, etc., in addition to American military aggression and cultural and 
economic imperialism.
 
Proximity to the USA has exposed Mexican Americans, like other
New World immigrants, to political, economic, 
and cultural aspects of American society  making them careful of negatively
assimilating to family breakdown, women's 
rights, etc., in addition to American military aggression and cultural and 
economic imperialism.
 Traditional extended families (often 
fragmented or dysfunctional) with traditional gender roles are more common in 
minorities than in dominant culture. Brevity of childhood, beginning work early to 
support family, and early child-bearing ("age at first birth") are contrary to 
the American 
 dominant culture's extended childhoods, but this may result from class more 
than ethnicity.
 
Traditional extended families (often 
fragmented or dysfunctional) with traditional gender roles are more common in 
minorities than in dominant culture. Brevity of childhood, beginning work early to 
support family, and early child-bearing ("age at first birth") are contrary to 
the American 
 dominant culture's extended childhoods, but this may result from class more 
than ethnicity.
 Family breakdown may be intensified by government immigration 
regulations that separate families, resembling family disruptions 
suffered by American Indians (boarding schools, forced migration) and African 
Americans (families separated by slave market and for dehumanizing purposes).
 
Family breakdown may be intensified by government immigration 
regulations that separate families, resembling family disruptions 
suffered by American Indians (boarding schools, forced migration) and African 
Americans (families separated by slave market and for dehumanizing purposes).
 If 
minority identity in the USA is primarily symbolized 
by the color code of black =
minority and 
white = dominant, Mexican Americans fall 
mostly in-between as brown.
 If 
minority identity in the USA is primarily symbolized 
by the color code of black =
minority and 
white = dominant, Mexican Americans fall 
mostly in-between as brown.
 Different dominant-culture settlement patterns led to greater rates of 
intermarriage in Mexico and other Latino states between whites and people of 
color. (See mestizo.) Thus Mexican Americans may be
minority in a 
genetic sense.
 
Different dominant-culture settlement patterns led to greater rates of 
intermarriage in Mexico and other Latino states between whites and people of 
color. (See mestizo.) Thus Mexican Americans may be
minority in a 
genetic sense.
 Since American society distinguishes "minorities" by "race," Mexican Americans 
and other Hispanics / Latinos further frustrate familiar black-white or 
dark-light divisions for
minority & dominant 
cultures. Mexican Americans may be any color or appearance, though the variable
mestizo mix of European and Indian is most 
familiar.
 
Since American society distinguishes "minorities" by "race," Mexican Americans 
and other Hispanics / Latinos further frustrate familiar black-white or 
dark-light divisions for
minority & dominant 
cultures. Mexican Americans may be any color or appearance, though the variable
mestizo mix of European and Indian is most 
familiar.
 
 
Distinct historical backgrounds of North 
American and Central American immigration.
The materials below partly describe how Mexican 
Americans are neither simply 
immigrant or
minority but 
something different that is still evolving in culture and consciousness. 
Mexican Americans combine cultural features that 
may align with
minority or
immigrant identity, but these features 
vary geographically, by class, and by history.
	
		| 
 North 
		America primarily settled by Northern European immigrants (English, 
		Germans, Dutch, French, etc.), who are Protestant Christians. (Dominant 
		or "Settler" culture of USA) 
 Protestant settlers more likely to bring wives, families (esp. New 
		England). | 
 Mexico and 
		Central America settled primarily by Spanish colonizers from souther 
		Europe, who are Catholic Christians. 
 Catholic explorers and colonizers more likely to be all-male expeditions 
		(soldiers, priests, administrators). | 
	
		|  |  thanks to
		
		http://www.u-s-history.com/pages/h1148.html
 | 
Distinct racial relations and 
attitudes result.
	
		| 
 North 
		American white settlers tend  not to intermarry with American Indians or, 
		later, African Americans. (Some intermarriage occurs on frontiers, and 
		there's always plenty of inter-racial sexuality, much of it 
		exploitative, but children of these relations are consigned to minority 
		communities.) 
 As a result, North American society officially regards 
		races as pure, 
		permanent, and separate—often prescribed by God or nature and 
		associated with different classes or social purposes (e.g., ownership, 
		labor). 
 Early North America and USA until recently regards 
		race as "black or 
		white," with little attention to in-between. | 
 Spanish 
soldiers take Indian women as sexual partners or wives, resulting in 
larger mixed-race population than in North America. See 
Mestizo. 
 Instead of  
		ethnic identity as "black or white," 
		ethnic identity is more 
		like a spectrum, with the broad center as "brown." See 
		Mestizo. 
 Central America and Mexico have plenty of color prejudice, and as in 
		North America, people with European skin and features dominate media, 
		financial, and other institutional power, but gradations are more 
		graduated or permeable? | 
	
		| USA as black-and-white 
  thanks to 
		
		https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uebkBveRugE
 | Latin America as spectrum centered on brown 
  thanks to
		
		http://www.thejuryexpert.com/2010/07/the-convoluted-spectrum
 -of-white-guilt-reactions-a-review-of-emerging-literature/
 | 
Different migration patterns.
Mexican Americans as 
minority in USA:
Historical: Conquest and 
annexation by the United States of Mexican territory in 1800s is historically 
analogous to conquest of American Indian lands in earlier centuries. 
(Involuntary contact with dominant culture)
(+ Minority status in Central America: American 
Indians were often enslaved or otherwise exploited by Spanish colonizers.) 
Racial / ethnic 
mix: Partial 
American Indian descent of many Mexican Americans associates them with American 
Indian minority status.
Color code: 
variation from "white = good" can cause negative stereotyping.
Traditional extended families (however 
fragmented or dysfunctional) with traditional gender roles are more common in 
minorities than in 
dominant culture. (tradition / modernity)
Brevity of childhood, beginning work early to 
support family, and early child-bearing ("age at first birth") are contrary to 
dominant culture's extended childhoods, but this may result from class more 
than ethnicity.
Gender inequality reinforced by 
Spanish conquest: Since the model of mestizo
		marriage was Male Conquistador + Female Indian, 
standard gender inequalities are reinforced by 
racial or ethnic inequalities, creating "double minority" status.
 
Mexican Americans as 
immigrants to 
USA:
Historical: 
Since most of "New Spain" became part of the USA, Mexican immigration to former 
parts of Mexico and other parts of the USA has taken place in several waves, responding 
to unrest in Mexico:
  Mexican Revolution of the 1910s
 
Mexican Revolution of the 1910s 
 Mexican debt 
crisis of the 1980s-90s
 Mexican debt 
crisis of the 1980s-90s
 NAFTA in 1990s
 NAFTA in 1990s
 need for cheap manual labor in the 
USA, especially during war-time (e.g. Bracero program during WW2).
 need for cheap manual labor in the 
USA, especially during war-time (e.g. Bracero program during WW2).
Racial / ethnic:  
mestizo identity connects not only with minority Indian but also with 
dominant-culture 
European identity.
 Intermarriage is a primary driver of 
assimilation. Since intermarriage is inherent in the Mexican American or 
mestizo identity, Mexican Americans appear to adapt easily to intermarriage with 
other ethnic groups within the USA.
 
Wild card: Mexican Americans are unique among immigrants 
because of proximity to homeland, shifting border, cultural contact, which 
both expedites and complicates issues of 
assimilation.
 
    
 
    
