LITR 3731: Creative
Writing 5th class meeting
Thursday, 24 September: Fourth poetry workshop class + discussion of reading assignments Reading assignment: Three Genres, ch. 11 (pp. 138-144) Reading highlight: Amanda Pruett 1st Poetry Author: Alicia Costello 1st Author’s Discussion Leader: Veronica Nadalin 2nd Poetry Author: J J Torres 2nd Author’s Discussion Leader: Christi Wood 3 September-1 October: The following students are required to do Draft Exchanges for their poetry manuscripts: Paul Acevedo, Jackie Baker, Peter Becnel, Jeff Derrickson, Naomi Gonzales, Jennifer M. Leonard, Amanda Pruett, Karina Ramos, Hillary Roth, Faron Samford, Ryan Smith, Natalie Walker, Christi Wood Models of poetry draft exchanges Final email submissions for poetry + revision accounts due by noon Saturday 3 October (email anytime b/w 28 Sept. & 3 Oct.) models of poetry submissions & revision accounts (2009) Thursday, 1 October: first fiction workshop (presenters get extra time for poetry submissions) 1st Fiction Author: Faron Samford 1st fiction author’s Discussion Leader: Niki Bippen 2nd Fiction Author: Natalie Walker 2nd fiction author’s Discussion Leader: Jeff Derrickson
ch. 11 (pp. 138-144) Poetry: From Craft to Art 138 craft = body of techniques—images, sound & rhythm, structure & order of material art < own voice; depth, freshness, resonance 138 reading regularly and critically 139 > imitative? > read widely 139 x-how to books > poetry itself 139 record poems, play as drive 140 x-lengthy work sessions, > spare half-hour regularity x waiting for ideal working time 140 explore new themes 141 try different forms 142 revise! 142 x-myth of inspiration [objectives] 142 x-tinkering > big questions 143 creative less inspiration than process 143 cliched image of writer in garret [objective] 143 support group; 7 ideal number 144 “That’s the way I intended it” > make a note
Leftover notes from previous classes poetry submissions and replies poetry submissions with either draft exchange reports or accounts due by email within 36 hours of this class meeting that is, by Wednesday morning. Review process: I'll read your poem(s) and your reports or accounts, write a 1-3 paragraph response with a grade, and email this to you, probably before next class. Welcome to reply to email. As questions, follow up, etc. I try not to write too much, but if you want more feedback, I can usually offer it on request.
problems so far: Your poem needs to have a title! You are submitting at least one poem + either a draft exchange report (if you didn't present a poem in class) or a revision account (if you did present a poem in class) (Either way, you're submitting a poem with some account of its development and revision)
upcoming schedule--fiction workshops
(notes from 2005)
review reading 145 experiences, details > reshape: divide , mix, alter, transform 145 select what we need and
invent the rest 146 x “untrue” > “seems true” 146 real life: jumble of
unconnected events and repetitious activities 147 edit unconsciously 147 fictional totally liberated from experience as it happened ch. 13 (pp. 155-166) Where
Stories Come From 155 fresh material < own life, original, unique what we know well + invent 160 one foot in circle of familiar + one foot reaching
out 163 transformation: from facts to fiction 163 conscious transformation 164 transformation = psychic liberation 165 “Not even your best friend would read it” 165 junk details 165 fuse 2 people into single fictional charcter
Also, I intend to follow up on our previous workshop discussion . . . . *************************************** How intensify the workshop critique? . . . Can or should Discussion Leaders’ questions be suggested or formalized? How many drafts? What was your biggest problem? What do you want to improve? Have some standard questions plus discussion leader free to ask questions required questions generic question / prompt that can be varied for the particular poem *************************************** I intend to draft an outline of generic questions for discussion leaders to follow and vary If finish in time, send to next week's discussion leaders (Rachel Barton and Amber Buitron) for try-out If promising, will adapt for fiction workshops
|