(2015 midterm assignment)

Model Student Midterm answers 2015 (Index)

Essay 2: Personal / professional topic

LITR 4368
Literature of the Future  

Model Assignments

 

Oh. Zee. (Ozzy Martinez)
6/30/20XX

The Subliminal Line

I think I would agree with Kevin Kaup’s perspective, “Ironically, the idea of an apocalypse can validate one's existence, and give perspective to a life that appears as no more than a blip on the radar of human existence and experience.” I would agree that death is a grand part of why life has any worth, and that it’s all about the tightrope walk between immortality and oblivion. I think the point of futuristic literature is to find for humanity a suitable end, one worthy of its current existence. When considering Revelations and Sower, the relative ends of humanity don’t paint them a great picture. From a personal and professional perspective, I want to paint humanity a good picture, and give it a worthy demise (so to speak).

          The apocalyptic transgressions of an era can also give light to its strengths. Like “Mozart in Mirrorshades,” time travel is used (presented to be used) for merely capitalistic tendencies, but survivalist as well. The scope of our technology to trivially burst through time and cause splintering near apocalyptic scenarios and duck out when convenient shows the strength of a civilization that can treat itself so casually. It also shows the brutality inherent when technology can sever us from ourselves. The media can argue that the rise of digital means of communication has desensitized us to heartfelt conversations and social conventions, and so time travel has caused the future to pillage its own origins without respect to them.

          What I’ve taken from this is the more abstract way of thinking in the sublime. My personal understanding of the sublime is the presence of an overwhelming power and the absence of its use, or rather the observation without direct action; the sublime is synonymous with restraint. With “Mozart”, we see a glimpse of an ultimately dominating unfeeling culture that has its own origins as a plaything, moving history around like vinyl miniatures. “Gernsback Continuum” brings forth the idea of alternative futures overlapping our own, coexisting in spatial and temporal terms and yet distanced by a “membrane of probability.” Man no longer the domineering child but an apathetic cosmos with the potential to bend and blend the forking paths of life betwixt and enjoy the fallout.   

          Personally I hope to understand a unified approach for humanities limitless potentials that encapsulate both the alternative and branching parallel realities, one that shares the sublime of both “Gernsback” but also Arthur C. Clark’s Childhood’s End, the novel I will be sharing for my future vision. In essence, the sublime aspect of humanity having it’s crisis solved (in a way the Time Machine only hinted at) but the realities of a universe where humans have that absolute command for their surroundings. Childhood uses the concept with a power from without, but still manages that central question of an omnipotent guardian overlord and the proper use of power, in effect, the restraint of its power. It is in this regard I hope to use the material of the semester to solve this fundamental problem, and have taken from it an optimism.
          Despite the messy origins of our creation, culture, and knowledge, the materials thus far have shown us our ability to adapt and mutate the stories of old and cleave of them the lessons from the baggage. As a society we’re cultivating a heightened metareceptor (in a sense) that allows us to see past the literary brunt and extract from it an authorial intent. And I can’t get further than that; if I have a professional purpose it’s to understand that, to build off these branching various methods of reality and deconstruct one from the others. From the linear aspects of the bible to evolutionary, cyclical, alternating, parallel, and the complicating societies that bred them, what then comes from our digital era of simultaneity, of big data and the destruction of life’s ephemeral nature, now broadcast unto the universe and existing (potentially) forever. But these are topics yet to be discussed in our class that I’ll hope to touch on later.