LITR 4368
Literature of the Future
        

Model Assignments

Final Exam Essays 2019

assignment

Sample answers for Essay 1:
compare 2 or more “future scenarios”

 

Audrey Lange

5/9/19

Ultra-Terrestrial or Extra-Terrestrial: Comparable Futures in Fiction

          Earth’s future seems an almost intentional question mark in a universe full of them. Terra nova seems to be out of reach for us, which begs the question of what to do with the planet we call home. Future-fiction has provided many different ideas about what our future looks like—cataclysms, bountiful crops, and alien contacts abound. Two of these future scenarios, however, have a peculiar draw to each other. Ecotopias represent what the Earth could be without human beings, or with a negligible amount of human interference. Alien contact is the inverse: it is not a recovery as an ecotopia is, it is a discovery. Both futures present questions about what our place means -- if it means anything at all.

          The early stages of an ecotopia are marked by progressive urbanity: veganism, sustainable power, repairing the ozone, the like. The intention is to use technology to fix the planet, streamlining a high-tech future with an ecologically respectful vision. This is what the solarpunks argued in favor of: “Positive futures where plausible technologies give us practical green solutions (...) large space sailboats driven by solar radiation, production of biofuels via nanotechnology, the advent of photosynthetic humans.” Repurposing modern society as a clean, green machine was the intent: living with the planet, not on it. However, technology is often directly in opposition to ecological progress: industrial waste, mining, even solar panels have an environmental impact. Those materials have to be harvested from somewhere, and the waste let out somewhere else. Early ecotopias seem to focus heavily on modifying our technology to stop harm, not necessarily to fix the harm already done.

          Late-stage ecotopias shed all predisposition towards modern technologies, relying solely on survival skills. The harm has been done and the Earth has forced humanity into a position of de-evolution; the story, thus, becomes ultra-terrestrial. Many late-stage ecotopian stories mirror early Indigenous stories: responsible consumption, farming, and tribe-like communities abound. Ernest Callenbach’s story “Chocco” presents us with a late-stage ecotopia where the remaining human population possesses a sharp reverence for the Earth that still allows them to live upon it. “We are Sun People -- we honor our star but we also fear it,” the narrator tells his audience (190). This respect for nature is a key facet of ecotopias. The fear is what, often, keeps people alive. The commandments this tribe lives by are tenets of most classical ecotopian fiction: “restrain our numbers, limit our consumption, remember that the spiritual is the measure and meaning of all things” (197). This idea of restraining excess in all things is what makes it markedly different than early-stage ecotopias: it is not about humans. It is about preserving the planet we live upon during her recovery.

          The planet we live upon, as of right now, remains untouched by any lifeforms but ones native to Earth. However, future fiction has begun to try and account for what might happen if extraterrestrials did touch Earth or those who live upon it. William Gibson’s “Hinterlands” is a terrifying account of what happens when human beings come to meet something they cannot fathom. The original astronaut to reach these beings is heralded as a hero, but the narrator knows she “tried to hide us from [alien contact], clawing at her radio gear, bloodying her hands to destroy her ship's broadcast capacity, praying Earth would lose her, let her die. (...) She was trying to keep us from finding our way out there, where she'd been. She knew that if we found her, we'd have to go. Even now, knowing what I know, I still want to go” (7.19, 8.6). “Hinterlands” presents us with a uniquely human ultimatum: to know more, you have to lose something. You have to lose someone. We never see these extraterrestrials, but that, it seems, is not the intention of the work. The work seems to highlight that in order to understand even a fraction of extraterrestrial life, we must sacrifice, and we must do it willingly.

          Early stage-ecotopias share a lot of similarities with stories of alien contact. Solarpunks try to draw what they can from ultraterrestrial sources, extracting every last bit of information and worth out of the planet. The administration in “Hinterlands” does the same with the alien artifacts returned by the astronauts. They create whole fields of study around it (similar to the studies that would need to be created in order for solarpunks to achieve “photosynthetic humans”) and continue to sacrifice resources in pursuit of that cause. These two paths diverge, however, when it comes to the information gleaned. Ecotopias are centralized around the idea of living with the planet, in one way or another. It is the pursuit of the ultra-terrestrial. Alien contact stories have usually moved beyond Earth; they have exhausted its resources and holding capacity and are reaching out into the cosmos for something else. The intention is that extra-terrestrial materials, technologies, or beings can and will carry us beyond what we know as our home, and into the stars.

          The pursuit of the future, in whatever form it takes, will never cease so long as we are able to imagine a future at all. Future narratives serve as both a reminder that we have future in front of us, as well as a means of quantifying what that future may look like. Terrestrial living by no means has to be bleak, and it seems that future may lie ahead of us. Learning to control excess and understanding how to repair the planet are key first steps into perhaps a differently imagined ecotopia. Alternatively, we could encounter an alien species and move beyond our own planet, leaving potentially centuries of knowledge behind in pursuit of a galactic future. Regardless of how the story ends (or continues), fiction will continue to help shape its potentialities.

 

Works Cited

Callenbach, Ernest. "Chocco." Future Primitive: The New Ecotopias, edited by Kim Stanley Robinson, Tom Doherty Associates Inc., 1994, pp. 189-213.

Gibson, William. "Hinterlands." Burning Chrome, 1986.

Heer, Jeet. "The New Utopians." The New Republic, 9 Nov. 2015.