2019 Midterm1 (assignment)

Sample Student Midterm Answers 2019

Part 2. Web Highlights

LITR 4340 American Immigrant Literature

Model Assignments

Erin Bates

The Analysis of a New Home

          The three pieces I chose for my web highlights essay are directly related to assimilation and resistance within the dominant culture for immigrants and minorities, and the views are similar to my own observations. The midterm essays drew me due to the inherent unfairness of immigrant and minority treatment, and the research proposal looked specifically at the experiences of Vietnamese immigrants and the challenges they faced. These three pieces led me to a greater understanding of the roadblocks placed in the path of immigrants and minorities with the desire to explore this further in my midterm essay and research proposal.

          Amber Boone’s essay “A Look at Assimilation and Resistance” focuses on the dichotomy of hope and pain that characterize immigrant and minority narratives. Her observation that choice distinguishes immigrants from minorities indicates the primary impediment to minority assimilation: “they did not choose the ‘American Dream,’ and their experiences, therefore, may oftentimes model the ‘American Nightmare’” (Boone). I especially found her discussion of resistance to assimilation as merited beneficial to her argument. This central conflict between two figures heavily into her observations into the attitudes that immigrants and minorities take toward the dominant culture, and I found it a valuable insight.

          While Dorothy Noyes’s essay “Resistance Versus Persistence: How Does Immigrant Literature Differ?” makes many of the same points as Boone’s essay, I found her concentration on the similarities to be unique to discussion in class. I agreed wholeheartedly in her point that “both do well in illustrating the feeling of ‘otherness’ so often ignored by the dominant culture” (Noyes). This helps to paint both immigrants and minorities as outsiders in the eyes of the dominant culture and provides an excellent point from which to discuss the fundamental differences between the two.

          My decision to focus on Jessica Tran’s research report “Rebuilding a New Life” was done mainly with the idea of the dominant culture as a gatekeeper, and the admittance of refugees figures heavily into this idea. Her subject of the difficulties experienced by a group that straddles the line of choice and forced migration brings the two concepts discussed before together into a unique perspective. I was especially interested in the research she’d done on the methods the U.S. government used in resettling the refugees, such as the fact that “official resettlement policy aimed at dispersing refugees to minimize the impact on local receiving communities and integrating refugees into the American economy and society as quickly as possible” (Tran). In trying to make things easier on the host country, the dominant culture had inadvertently caused more distress to the refugees by isolating them from possible sources of comfort. By making the process more difficult, the refugee experience mirrors the minority narrative in depriving the benefits of an immigrant community in their efforts to adjust to the United States.

          Though the immigrant narrative can be one of romantic hope, these pieces display the difficulties that immigrants and minorities can encounter when interacting with the dominant culture. These difficulties paint the dominant culture into an ironic dichotomy of being both welcoming and unwelcoming of newcomers to varying degrees. The arbitrary nature of this process especially fascinates me, and I’d like to explore it further in my research proposal. As a member of the dominant culture, I think that America can do better by those who, as my dad once put it, “are half American simply before they even get here.”