Stephen Defferari 
 
Gregory Buchanan’s essay, “The Complex Duality of Romantic Selfhood,” highlights 
an important aspect of Romanticism as a whole: the relationship of desire and 
loss to self-formation. In relation to the works of Nathaniel Hawthorne, who was 
deeply concerned with the efficacy of identity and self-fragmentation, desire 
and loss are problematic within the context of puritanism. Mortality was a 
consequence of Edenic transgression, and so mortal flesh becomes a sinful medium 
in a transitory world that should by all rights eschew its more base impulses, 
such as desire. Yet for parson Hooper in “The Minister’s Black Veil,” the loss 
of flesh and the abnegation of its attendant desires are traded for spiritual 
gain, even if this transaction is rendered untenable by the theological concept 
of original sin.  
Elena 
Luquette’s essay, “A Gothic Transcendence into the Sublime,” addresses the 
untenable doctrine of original sin in puritan theology. In relation to the 
narrator of “The Minister’s Black Veil,” it is difficult though to determine its 
intention – whether it is to simply convey a story which demonstrates a series 
of uncanny aspects, or if it is calling into question the tenable or untenable 
nature of puritanism.  
Marissa Holland’s essay, “The Trifecta of the Sublime,” interested me for the 
reason that I began to think about the potential compatibility between the 
sublime in nature and perhaps also in relation to human nature. Is it possible 
to experience a moment of the sublime when confronted with some significant 
aspect of human nature. Naturally those things which are deemed sublime in 
quality are found in nature, but could some aspect of human nature produce the 
same effect? 
All 
of these essays raise important issues related to my interest in American 
Romanticism, and Romanticism as a broad thematic category with a complex series 
of interrelated topics – Gothicism, sublimity, mankind’s relationship with 
nature, individuality, and alienation. Alienation is perhaps a topic I have 
dealt with less in my exposure and critical work with Romanticism, and this 
seems to me to be related to identity in some way. 
Romantic identity is usually thought of in terms of intrinsic qualities or 
alienation; or perhaps there is a degree of mutuality subsists between the two, 
insofar as intrinsic qualities or abilities produce a natural separation from 
mankind at large. So it seems these criteria are problematic for puritanism, 
since the latter denies almost univocally spiritual individuality, and 
disregards the importance of material efforts in this world.   
 
  |