Caryn Livingston
Hawthorne’s Sad Heroic Individual
In understanding the concept of the heroic individual standing apart from
society, Emerson’s Self-Reliance
seems the most obvious choice. However, as someone who found Emerson’s arguments
lacking in persuasive power, Nathaniel Hawthorne’s stories
The Minister’s Black Veil and
Young Goodman Brown are very
affecting in their depiction of an individual struggle in the face of a weak and
corrupt society. Particularly, certain passages in
The Minister’s Black Veil highlight
how Father Hooper lived as a man apart from society even in the midst of his
community and as a pillar of it, simply by hiding his face with a piece of black
cloth. Though otherwise behaving as always and unchanged overall, he is rejected
for his action by a community aghast at behavior they cannot understand and what
it may signify.
The scene that most effectively depicts the heroic individual’s rejection
of society is at Father Hooper’s deathbed when another minister attempts to
remove Hooper’s black veil before he dies. Father Hooper has become infamous for
his veil and remained a respected but feared individual throughout his life, as
the act of hiding his face forces him apart from the rest of society. At the
moment just before his death, Hooper calls down a judgment on those gathered
around him and society in general for its rejection of him, claiming that it is
the physical manifestation of his veil only that all of his congregation,
friends, and fiancée shrank from. “When the friend shows his inmost heart to his
friend; the lover to his best beloved; when man does not vainly shrink from the
eye of his Creator, loathsomely treasuring up the secret of his sin; then deem
me a monster,” Hooper says during this scene, because everyone living in the
society keeps himself veiled metaphorically even to his closest friends and
loved ones while shunning Hooper for wearing a physical reminder of their own
concealment.
The reason I find this scene so powerful when Emerson’s essay seemed more
self-aggrandizing is due to the lack of essentialism in Hawthorne’s depiction of
society. Hawthorne does not condemn society as something irredeemable but
focuses instead on what it actually is—a collection of individuals who are all
constantly faced with the decision to be influenced by their own consciences or
the opinions of others. Transcendentalist philosophers like Emerson frequently
reject common feeling among people as merely a symptom of society rather than
shared traits of humanity to be accepted, as when in
Self-Reliance Emerson writes, “When
good is near you, when you have life in yourself, it is not by any known or
accustomed way.” This is contrasted with Hawthorne’s Father Hooper, who rather
than only praise individual virtue instead laments society’s failings and that
he must stand separate from them, as when he begs his betrothed, “O! you know
not how lonely I am, and how frightened, to be alone behind my black veil. Do
not leave me in this miserable obscurity forever!”
Hooper, at his death, chooses to be buried in his veil because the people in
society have failed to live honestly toward one another, but Hawthorne still
credits the individual members with making the choice of concealment. Like
Father Hooper, any of them could have made the choice to acknowledge their
shared failing of concealment of their truths from one another; they also could
have accepted Father Hooper despite his veil or even made the choice to stop
hiding themselves. While Emerson’s essay sounds more optimistic, with his
declaration that “Whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist,” Emerson leaves
no room for redemption of society and no room to consider the cost of rejecting
it, which is that loneliness that Father Hooper begged his fiancée Elizabeth to
spare him from. Father Hooper may be heroic in his willingness to stand apart
from his community, but realistically, he pays a price for his heroism.
|