Caryn Livingston 
Hawthorne’s Sad Heroic Individual 
         
In understanding the concept of the heroic individual standing apart from 
society, Emerson’s Self-Reliance 
seems the most obvious choice. However, as someone who found Emerson’s arguments 
lacking in persuasive power, Nathaniel Hawthorne’s stories
The Minister’s Black Veil and
Young Goodman Brown are very 
affecting in their depiction of an individual struggle in the face of a weak and 
corrupt society. Particularly, certain passages in
The Minister’s Black Veil highlight 
how Father Hooper lived as a man apart from society even in the midst of his 
community and as a pillar of it, simply by hiding his face with a piece of black 
cloth. Though otherwise behaving as always and unchanged overall, he is rejected 
for his action by a community aghast at behavior they cannot understand and what 
it may signify. 
         
The scene that most effectively depicts the heroic individual’s rejection 
of society is at Father Hooper’s deathbed when another minister attempts to 
remove Hooper’s black veil before he dies. Father Hooper has become infamous for 
his veil and remained a respected but feared individual throughout his life, as 
the act of hiding his face forces him apart from the rest of society. At the 
moment just before his death, Hooper calls down a judgment on those gathered 
around him and society in general for its rejection of him, claiming that it is 
the physical manifestation of his veil only that all of his congregation, 
friends, and fiancée shrank from. “When the friend shows his inmost heart to his 
friend; the lover to his best beloved; when man does not vainly shrink from the 
eye of his Creator, loathsomely treasuring up the secret of his sin; then deem 
me a monster,” Hooper says during this scene, because everyone living in the 
society keeps himself veiled metaphorically even to his closest friends and 
loved ones while shunning Hooper for wearing a physical reminder of their own 
concealment. 
         
The reason I find this scene so powerful when Emerson’s essay seemed more 
self-aggrandizing is due to the lack of essentialism in Hawthorne’s depiction of 
society. Hawthorne does not condemn society as something irredeemable but 
focuses instead on what it actually is—a collection of individuals who are all 
constantly faced with the decision to be influenced by their own consciences or 
the opinions of others. Transcendentalist philosophers like Emerson frequently 
reject common feeling among people as merely a symptom of society rather than 
shared traits of humanity to be accepted, as when in
Self-Reliance Emerson writes, “When 
good is near you, when you have life in yourself, it is not by any known or 
accustomed way.” This is contrasted with Hawthorne’s Father Hooper, who rather 
than only praise individual virtue instead laments society’s failings and that 
he must stand separate from them, as when he begs his betrothed, “O! you know 
not how lonely I am, and how frightened, to be alone behind my black veil. Do 
not leave me in this miserable obscurity forever!” 
Hooper, at his death, chooses to be buried in his veil because the people in 
society have failed to live honestly toward one another, but Hawthorne still 
credits the individual members with making the choice of concealment. Like 
Father Hooper, any of them could have made the choice to acknowledge their 
shared failing of concealment of their truths from one another; they also could 
have accepted Father Hooper despite his veil or even made the choice to stop 
hiding themselves. While Emerson’s essay sounds more optimistic, with his 
declaration that “Whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist,” Emerson leaves 
no room for redemption of society and no room to consider the cost of rejecting 
it, which is that loneliness that Father Hooper begged his fiancée Elizabeth to 
spare him from. Father Hooper may be heroic in his willingness to stand apart 
from his community, but realistically, he pays a price for his heroism. 
 
 
 
  |