Gregory Buchanan
14
May 2015
Philosophy and Literature United in American Romanticism
In my study of English literature, I am always interested in discovering
applications to philosophy. Our course has allowed me to make good use of my
undergraduate philosophy minor. Authors in American Romanticism exist in tension
with one another: each offers unique contributions to his or her nation's
interpretation of the genre, but each also identifies with a tradition that is
fundamentally shaped by others. Reconciling their individuality with their
identities as American Romantics has required me to better understand the
concepts that appear prominently in American Romanticism. Some of these I had
studied previously in other contexts, or was in the process of studying, but a
few were entirely new. And because concepts in American Romanticism are so
deeply engrained in our nation's popular culture, some were vaguely familiar,
but I had never formally articulated them. Specifically, our course refined my
understanding of desire and loss, which I understood in only philosophical
terms; it changed how I understood the relationship between Nathaniel
Hawthorne's and Stephen Crane's metaphysics, a relationship I only partially
appreciated in the past; and it exposed me to the concept of the romantic
narrative, which I had perceived in popular culture but never before considered
in scholarly terms. Acquiring these concepts has helped me better relate my
understanding of philosophy to my study of English literature, a unification of
knowledge I find very satisfying.
The mid-term examination offered me the opportunity to examine several
course texts for occurrences of cyclical desire and loss, an important concept
in American Romanticism, and a fascinating topic from a philosophical
perspective. I have always been interested in the motivations behind moral
actions, and our study of this concept allowed me to develop my understanding of
moral psychology in a very practical, concrete way. Moral psychology as a
discipline examines the faculties supposedly responsible for moral action,
particularly the mind and the will. Of these faculties, American Romanticism
emphasizes the operation of the will. When the will motivates an individual to
act, it generates a desire. When this desire has been fulfilled, moral
psychologists might say that it is sated or satisfied. However, in the texts
that we have studied, it is rare that desire is simply satisfied. Often the
object of the desire remains elusive, as Ligeia does in Edgar Allan Poe's
"Ligeia." Even when it is obtained, the possessor does not remain satisfied, but
experiences loss. In some cases, he or she experiences actual loss of the
object; in others, a realization that possession of the desired object is not
actually satisfying. Edgar Allan Poe's "William Wilson" illustrates the second
type of loss: the original William accomplishes his desired goal--he kills the
duplicate William--only to lose his life. Both kinds of loss yield new desires
in a perpetual cycle of craving and satiety. Satisfaction is always promised in
the achievement of a future desire, but it is almost never achieved.
Investigating this cycle has caused me to think differently about the role of
the will in practical decision making. I now realize the sophistication with
which it operates, sometimes in apparently self-defeating ways, and I plan to
apply these insights to my study of perennial problems in philosophy,
particularly that of free will. If free will exists, the operation of the will
must be effective, and the texts we have studied offer several interesting cases
in which it may not be. I plan to study each more closely.
My research project helped me organize my thinking about the relationship
between Hawthorne's and Crane's understandings of free will. Before this
semester, I knew that Hawthorne was not a strong proponent of Puritan theology,
but I was unclear about his exact position on the problem of free will. I
assumed that he was a determinist but was unable to articulate his orientation
toward determinism. There are two orientations toward determinism--positive and
negative. The negative orientation was familiar to me from prior reading: it
perceives people's lack of agency as a cause for pessimism about human affairs.
Many of the philosophers with which I was familiar were negatively oriented
toward determinism, and I considered it the only viable orientation. Although I
acknowledged that the positive orientation existed, I was unfamiliar with any
significant philosophers or writers who endorsed it. My assignment to present
Ralph Waldo Emerson's "Self-Reliance" and "The Over-Soul" introduced me to
Emerson's positive orientation toward determinism. After learning that
determinism could be meaningfully associated with optimism, I rethought my
understanding of Hawthorne's metaphysics. When I approached the research
project, I sought to present Hawthorne and Crane as optimists and determinists,
which required me to demonstrate the compatibility of their individual
philosophies. Crane is easier to present as an optimist than Hawthorne, but I
enjoyed making the comparison. Had I not been assigned to present Emerson's
essays, I would have approached my project differently, and I would have
continued believing that determinism cannot be meaningfully associated with
optimism.
In addition to learning more about topics in which I was interested
before the course, I also learned about an entirely new concept, the romance
narrative, which promises to remain relevant to my interests after the course
concludes. A romance narrative is an account of a benevolent character's quest
to achieve a goal that either directly or indirectly results in his or her
transcendence beyond mundane experience. Walt Whitman's "When I Heard the
Learn'd Astronomer" concisely illustrates its structure: a man attending an
astronomy lecture despairs of understanding the stars intellectually, so he
leaves the lecture-hall and achieves mystical unity by gazing skyward alone. I
find the idea of the romance narrative fascinating because its depiction of a
journey reveals limitations that are sometimes forgotten or concealed in our
everyday experience. In "When I Heard the Learn'd Astronomer," it is the lecture
of the astronomer that prevents the speaker from fully appreciating the stars.
The romance narrative of the poem points out that over-intellectualization can
sometimes obstruct our progress toward complete comprehension. Western culture
generally treats intelligence was an unequivocal good, so its limits are easy to
overlook without the help of a narrative centered around overcoming obstacles to
transcendence. Other obstacles to meaningful experience can also be detected
through the romance narrative. Additionally, the romance narrative may also
broaden my perspective regarding my role in the affairs of others. Like most
people, I am naturally inclined to conceptualize my life as a romance narrative
in which I am the questing hero. While there is nothing wrong with this, I might
increase my appreciation for the experiences of others by considering their
lives as romance narratives. American Romanticism offers narratives from the
perspectives of several identities, and viewing any in isolation from the others
is uninteresting. The romance narrative offers a convenient paradigm for
increasing awareness of others, in addition to exposing limits that cultural
predispositions sometimes conceal.
Overall, our course has substantially contributed to my intellectual
development: I learned the concept of desire and loss in a new context,
discovered a better way to connect Hawthorne's view of free will with Crane's,
and gained a new paradigm for recognizing limits in my search for meaningful
experience. I especially appreciated the course's willingness to indulge
appearances of concepts in popular culture. Many authors in American Romanticism
appear in popular culture, and I feel more prepared to explain their popular
portrayals. Our course complimented the American Realism course I completed last
semester, which also considered its texts from a philosophical perspective and
incorporated popular culture references. American Romanticism and American
Realism respond to similar philosophical questions in their canonical texts.
Combined with the American Realism course, our course has prepared me to
intelligently appreciate their answers.
|