| |
LITR 4533:
TRAGEDY |
|
LITR 4533
Tragedy: summer 2008
midterm
exam, 23 June 2008
Open-book,
open-notebook. Use
any relevant course materials, plus outside sources except direct coaching or contributions from another
person, or copying or borrowing from outside sources without attribution.
Options
for taking exam:
-
come to class during
exam period and write your answers in a blue book or on notebook paper
in blue or black ink, or
-
spend a roughly equivalent time at a terminal writing an electronic document and
sending it to the instructor at whitec@uhcl.edu
via email.
Timing:
The maximum time limit is 3 hours for in-class exams and 4 hours for online
exams.
You should
write for at least two hours.
By email you may
write and submit the exam anytime between the afternoon of
Thursday, 8 June, and 1pm, Monday, 23 June, but
keep a log of when you stop and start. Pauses are okay, but otherwise try
not to take any advantage unavailable to in-class students. You may consult with
the instructor by phone or email.
Response
to email: Instructor will acknowledge receipt of email exam within a few
hours--if no response, check address. Grades and notes are returned by email
within about a week.
In-class
protocol: Since you already have your copy of the midterm, you may simply
come to the classroom at 9am and begin writing whether instructor is there or
not. You may consult with the instructor--if not in classroom, phone office at
281 283 3380 or come to Bayou 2529-8. No need to ask permission for short breaks. Write in blue
or black ink in a bluebook
or notebook paper on fronts and
backs of pages. No need to
erase—just draw a line through anything you don’t want read. When finished, turn in exam at
instructor’s table or bring it to instructor's office .
Sending your
midterm by email: Try both of the
following
*Paste the contents of the appropriate word processing file directly into
the email message to whitec@uhcl.edu.
*“Attach” your word processing file to an email message. (My computer
uses Microsoft Word 2007. The only program my computer appears unable to
translate is Microsoft Works.
If in doubt, save your word processing file in "Rich Text
Format" or a “text only” format.)
Midterm contents: 2
essays of 4-6+ paragraphs each
- Essay 1: genre in general
- Essay 2: tragedy in particular
See below for details.
Your essay answers may overlap somewhat. If so, no need to
repeat yourself--just refer to what you wrote elsewhere, or review and extend.
Requirements of all essays
- Both your essays must have titles.
- See Model Assignments
for examples
- Length:
Each essay must be 4-6+
paragraphs, but numbers may vary with sentence and paragraph lengths. In
Text & handout requirements
-
Somewhere
in your whole exam you must refer substantively to each of the plays we read in class:
Oedipus
the King; Act 3, Scene 4 from Hamlet; Agamemnon; The
Homecoming (or Mourning Becomes Electra).
-
After
first references, you may abbreviate titles and names:
Oedipus
the King >
Oed; Agamemnon > Ag; Clytaemnestra > Cly, etc.
-
Welcome to refer to
outside examples familiar to your reading and viewing. ("outside" = other classes, plays, movies,
TV)
-
multiple references to Genre handout, course objectives, Aristotle's Poetics, Freud on
Oedipus & Hamlet
Midterm contents
detailed: 2 essays of 4-6+ paragraphs each
Essay 1: genre in general
Write a complete, unified essay on what you are learning
about genre and how it contributes to your understanding of literature.
- Refer repeatedly to Objective 1 (copied below) and to
the "Genres Handout," but don't just march through or copy.
Explain subject, representational, and narrative genres efficiently as you
review your learning process.
- Potential writing strategy: Describe your knowledge
of genre before the class and how that knowledge has been reinforced,
evolved, changed, or extended.
- Demonstrate understanding of difference between genre
as "rules" and genre as "conventions," norms, or
expectations.
- Since genre can be a slippery or confusing concept,
don't hesitate to acknowledge problems and how one copes.
- Mix examples from class readings
and presentations with examples from outside reading or experience.
- For a conclusion, summarize your learning, possibly
extend to
potential beyond this course.
Essential terms--every term may not fit, but
keep these terms in sight
-
conventions (a.k.a. expectations, norms, standard features, "contract with reader")
-
Narrative / plot, esp. in tragedy, comedy, romance
-
genre,
esp.
subject, representational, & narrative
Course Objective 1. To study
"genres" of literature not as rules but as adaptable conventions
of subject,
narrative, and representation. (genres handout)
1a. Subject
genre: in contrast to the affirmative escapism of comedy and romance, tragedy
develops complex, non-escapist morality.
1b.
Representational genre: compare the dramatic "dialogue"
of tragedy with "simple narration" of song or speech, or
the "narration + dialogue" of novels.
1c.
Narrative genre: compare and contrast the narrative of tragedy with those of
comedy, romance, and satire, especially in terms of learning.
|
Essay 2: tragedy in particular
Write a complete, unified essay describing your learning
curve relative to the genre of Tragedy.
- Potential writing strategy: Describe your knowledge
of Tragedy before the class and how that knowledge has been reinforced,
evolved, changed, or extended.
In developing your answer, consider or answer at least a
few of the following issues, according to their importance or your themes about
learning.
- Refer to objective 2 (box below), but welcome to go
beyond its limits.
- Since Tragedy's subject matter sounds dismal and
depressing, how or why does it attract people's attention and respect? Which
people? What
difficulties do you have in comprehending its appeal? What challenges to your teaching or your own interests?
How overcome?
- Why or how might Tragedy be considered the greatest genre?
How may this greatness be questioned?
- Issues like the Oedipal / Electra conflict--What may
one learn about Tragedy or
families?
- Plot, character, and spectacle in Aristotle's
Poetics.
- How does Tragedy compare with Comedy and Romance?
-
Classical Tragedy & its Updates: What do
we learn from studying the evolution
of tragedy from classical Greece to later periods? Why does
Tragedy retell similar stories in Oedipus the King and Hamlet, and
again in Agamemnon and The Homecoming? How does the story change
or evolve from Classical Greece to Shakespeare's or O'Neill's times or our own?
To conclude:
-
Broadly summarize what you have learned about tragedy.
-
What was the most surprising or interesting
aspect of tragedy that you have learned, and why? (or you could start this
earlier)
Essential terms--every term may not fit, but
keep these terms in sight
Plot, character, spectacle
Irony
Oedipal conflict
Comedy, romance, romantic comedy
Course Objective 2.
To evaluate "the greatness of tragedy" (handout) as the supreme genre
in western culture and art.
2a. To
describe the heroic cultural values associated
with dramatic tragedies in
various periods of western history.
2b. To
assert the purpose of tragic art for
a “feel-good” society.
2c. To balance art's competing or complementary values of "liking" and "learning."
|
Evidence of learning: All midterms are
expected to use central terms and themes from objectives with text-examples
highlighted in lecture-discussion with competence
Extension of learning: Better
midterms refresh, extend, or vary terms, themes, and examples with
the student's own language or voice, plus examples from wider reading,
viewing, and experience beyond this class.
|