LITR 4533: Tragedy, UHCL—On the greatness of tragedy

Tragedy is widely if tacitly recognized as the greatest of literary genres. As with its heroes' “tragic flaws,” however, the same qualities that make tragedy great may also make problems (which is no problem for critics!)

Aspect of tragedy that makes it “great”

Corresponding aspect that limits appeal, universality, etc.

Tragedy is more memorable and durable than more popular genres (comedy, romance); profound or sublime qualities imprint memory and imagination The same qualities that make Tragedy memorable may be why many avoid it. Playing with pain can be dangerous; "Get over it" or "Why go there?"
Tragic heroes (Hamlet, Oedipus) more memorable, titanic, disturbing  than comic or romantic ones “Give it a rest”: great characters can be tiresome, unsympathetic, over-the-top; romantic/comic characters = familiar & easy

Tragedy appears in "great periods of history": ambition, arts, & empires. Classical Greece, Elizabethan England, France in 18th c., Mid-20c USA

Tragedy may also be sign of imperial aggressiveness, rise of controlling state. Does a great writer require a great cultural period to write tragedy?

Characters or audiences may learn from tragedy (Aristotle: “to learn gives the liveliest pleasure”)

Most people go to plays or movies to “escape,” not to learn or engage with social problems or human issues

Complexity of characters, plots, outcomes more accurately imitates complexity of reality

Threatening to strict black-and-white moralities of right versus wrong

Tragedy challenges prevailing social or psychological frameworks; the action’s upheaval of society permits questioning of right & wrong (ethics)

Comedy, romance personalize problems, reaffirm or evade status quo; satire may only challenge violations of status quo.

Inspires search for truth (rather than assumptions) plus ethical sharing guilt or blame; humans made of good and bad, formed by free will and fate

Simplistic right-and-wrong thinking may sometimes be correct. As Jokasta warns Oedipus, "Stop asking questions."

Suppression of spectacle and physicality of comedy opens to spiritual possibilities

Suppression may deny physicality of human life; may encourage too much other-worldly thinking

Rarity of tragedy, compared to common popularity of comedy, romance, and satire.

Tragedy's popularity is limited: No easy answers, satisfaction of physical sensation or spectacle

Break or gap between greatness and loss exposes or permits insight into human condition, fear and pity, depth of character

Lacks comforting reassurance or confirmation of comedy, romance, which give us pleasure or justify us for being where we already are

Gives voice to taboo topics such as incest, suicide, child murder while punishing transgressions. Other genres suggest the forbidden while avoiding responsibility for it.

Expression may legitimize taboo subjects; also audience appeal; nothing more immediately pleasurable than to escape problems and feel right about it

Adaptability: tragedy adapts to changing history; greatness is a meaningful but elusive quality. (If we can pin it down, it stops being great. "Classic" is book that stays open.)

Tragedy as a genre is difficult to explain except by false “rules” (tragic flaw, “the unities,” etc.); comedy, romance, and satire comparatively easier to explain by markers, signs.