| |
LITR
4332 American Minority Literature 2008 Syllabus
Course
Objectives
-
Course Objectives are
ideas and terms developed in lectures, discussions, presentations, and
examinations.
-
Objectives also
identify learning outcomes.
Cultural or
Minority-Concept Objectives (1-4)
-
Most minority or multicultural courses offer little
theory or background on what makes a minority ethnic group.
-
American Minority and
Immigrant Literature define minority status in contrast to immigrant
status:
Historical foundation:
Instructor's attitude:
Americans want simple answers to complex problems so they can veg, party, and
get rich or righteous. But the history and premises of minority culture differ so
fundamentally from those of the American dominant / immigrant culture that
simple answers are only denials of our complicated history. In light of such challenges, I've
developed the following attitudes:
- Keep talking and listening. America's an unfinished story.
The answers are not written but being written.
- Question platitudes and discussion-stoppers like "All people are
basically just the same" and "Why can't we all just be Americans?"
- Sometimes the only positive outcome is not to be right but to
act right.
Objective 1: Minority Definitions
American minorities are defined not by numbers but by power
relations modeled on ethnic groups’ problematic relation to the American
dominant culture.
1a. Involuntary participation and continuing oppression—the
American Nightmare
Unlike the dominant immigrant culture, ethnic minorities
did not choose to come to America or join its dominant culture.
(African Americans were kidnapped, American Indians were invaded.)
Exploitation and oppression instead of opportunity—whereas
immigrant cultures see America as a land of equality and opportunity, minorities
may remember America as a place where their people have been dispossessed of
property and power and deprived of basic human rights.
Thus the "social contract" of Native Americans and
African Americans differs from that of European Americans, Asian Americans, and
most Latin Americans.
The American dominant culture dismisses minority grievances:
“That was a long time ago. . . . Get over it.” But consequences of "no
choice" echo down the generations, particularly as minority difference
versus assimilation (see objective 3).
1b. “Voiceless and choiceless”; “Voice = Choice”
Contrast the dominant culture’s self-determination or choice
through self-expression or voice, as in "The Declaration of
Independence."
1c. To observe alternative identities and literary strategies
developed by minority cultures and writers to gain voice and choice:
-
“double language” (same words, different
meanings to different audiences)
-
using the dominant culture’s words
against them
-
conscience to dominant culture (which
otherwise forgets the past).
1d. “The Color Code”
-
Literature represents the extremely sensitive subject of skin
color infrequently or indirectly.
-
Western civilization transfers values associated with “light and dark”—e. g., good & evil, rational /
irrational—to people of light or dark complexions, with huge implications for
power, validity, sexuality, etc.
-
This course mostly treats minorities as a historical
phenomenon, but the biological or visual aspect of human identity may be
more immediate and direct than history. People most comfortably interact
with others who look like themselves or their family.
-
Skin color matters, but how much varies by circumstances.
-
See also Objective 3 on racial hybridity.
1e. Dominant Culture Attitudes
-
Immigrants leave the past behind and think minorities should
do the same.
-
Thus the dominant American immigrant culture dismisses minority
grievances with shrugs, platitudes, and exasperation: “That was a long time ago.
. . . Get over it”
-
Despite powerful evidence to the contrary, the dominant
culture claims to be colorblind : “My parents
raised me not to judge people by the color of their skin” (frequently
articulated by
those resentful of minority expression).
Objective 2: race > gender, class, etc.
To observe representations and narratives (images and
stories) of ethnicity, gender, and class as a means of
defining minority categories.
2a. Gender: Is the
status of women, lesbians, and homosexuals analogous to that of ethnic
minorities in terms of voice and choice? Do "women of color" become "double
minorities?"
2b. To detect "class" as a repressed subject of American
discourse.
-
“You can tell you’re an American if you can’t talk about class.”
-
American culture officially regards itself as "classless"; race and
gender often replace class divisions of power, labor, ownership, or "place."
-
Class may remain identifiable in signs or “markers” of power and prestige
-
High-class status in the USA is often marked by plainness, simplicity, or
lack of visibility.
2c. "Quick check" on minority status: What is the
individual’s or group’s relation to the law or other dominant
institutions? Does "the law" (e. g., the police) make things better or worse?
Objective 3: minority dilemma--assimilate or resist?
-
Does the minority fight or join the dominant
culture that exploited it?
-
What balance do minorities strike between the
economic benefits of assimilation and its personal or cultural
sacrifices?
-
In general, immigrants assimilate, while minorities
remain separate (though connected in many ways).
3a. To contrast the dominant-culture ideology of racial
separation from American practice, which frequently involves
hybridity (mixing) and change.
-
The dominant American white culture typically sees races
and genders as pure and permanent categories,
perhaps allotted by God or Nature as a result of Creation, climate, natural
selection, etc.,
-
But races always mix. What we call "pure" is only the latest
change we're used to.
-
Racial divisions & definitions constantly change or adapt;
e. g., the Old South's quadroons, octaroons, "a single drop"; recent revisions
of racial origins of Native America; Hispanic as "non-racial" classification;
"bi-racial"
-
Contrast “four races” (Aboriginal, Caucasian, Mongolian,
& Negroid) with “only one race: the human race”
-
Instead of “black & white” dynamics, America is
increasingly
“brown” or "other"
-
“post-racial” identity of urban American youth
following school integration, in contrast to "pure" races surviving in suburbs
and private religious schools
3b. To identify the
"new American" who crosses, combines, or confuses ethnic or gender
identities
(e. g., Tiger Woods, Halle Berry, Lenny Kravitz, Mariah Carey, David Bowie, Boy
George, Tila Tequila Nicole Scherzinger of Pussycat Dolls, Vin Diesel)
Objective 4: individual & collective identities
To observe images of the individual, the family,
and alternative families in the writings and experience of minority groups.
4a. Generally speaking, minority groups place more emphasis on
“traditional” or “community” aspects of human society, such as extended families
or alternative families, and they mistrust “institutions.” The dominant culture
celebrates individuals and nuclear families and identifies more with
dominant-cultural institutions or its representatives, like law enforcement
officers, teachers, bureaucrats, etc. (Much variation, though.)
4b. To question sacred modern concepts like "individuality" and
"rights" and politically correct ideas like minorities as "victims"; to explore
emerging postmodern identities, e. g. “biracial,” “global,” and
“post-national.”
Literary or Style Objectives
(5 & 6)
Objective 5: Minority Narratives
-
“Narratives” are stories or plots, a sequence of
events in which people act and speak in time.
-
Narratives concern not only how a writer tells a story, but also how an audience receives, processes,
and makes meaning of it.
-
A cultural narrative is a collective story that
unifies or directs a community--for example, The American Dream for the USA,
or particular minority narratives that reflect an ethnic group's experience
or range of expression.
-
Following Minority-Culture Objective 1, Minority
Narratives differ from the dominant “American Dream”
narrative—which involves voluntary participation, forgetting the past, and
individuals or nuclear families.
-
Instead, minority narratives generally involve involuntary participation,
reconnecting to a broken past,
and traditional, extended, or alternative families.
Tabular summary of Objective 5:
contrasts
between the dominant culture's "American Dream" narrative and minority
narratives
Category of comparison / dominant or minority |
"American Dream" or immigrant narrative of dominant culture |
Minority Narratives (not traditional immigrants) |
Cultural group's original relation to USA |
Voluntary participation (individual or
ancestor chose to come to America) |
Involuntary participation ("America" came to
individual or ancestral culture) |
Cultural group's relation to time |
Modern or revolutionary: Forget the past,
leave it behind, get over it (original act of immigration;
future-oriented) |
Traditional but disrupted: Reconnect to the
past (not voluntarily abandoned; more like a wound that needs healing) |
Social structures |
Abandonment of past context favors individual or
nuclear family, erodes extended social structures. |
Traditional extended family shattered;
non-nuclear, "alternative," or improvised families survive. |
5a. African American alternative narrative: “The
Dream”
-
"The Dream" resembles but is not identical to "The American
Dream."
-
Whereas the American Dream emphasizes immediate individual success, "the
Dream" factors in setbacks, the need to rise again, and group dignity.
5b. Native American Indian alternative narrative:
"Loss and Survival"
-
Dominant / immigrant culture leaves its past
behind to gain rights and opportunities--the American Dream.
-
For Indians, the American Dream of immigration is
the American Nightmare, creating an undeniable narrative of loss: the native
people were once “the Americans” but lost most of their people, land,
rights, and opportunities.
-
Despite these terrible losses, Native
Americans defy the myth of "the vanishing Indian," choosing to "survive,"
sometimes in faith that the dominant culture will eventually destroy itself, and
the forests and buffalo will return.
-
The American dominant culture usually writes only half
of the Indians' story, romanticizing their loss (e. g., The Last of the
Mohicans) and ignoring the Indians who adapt and survive.
5c. Mexican American narrative: “The Ambivalent Minority” or
Third Way
-
"Ambivalent" means having "mixed feelings" or contradictory
attitudes.
-
Mexican Americans as a group may feel or exemplify mixed feelings
about whether they are a minority group that will remain separate or an immigrant
culture that will assimilate.
-
As individuals or families who come to America for
economic gain but suffer social dislocation, Mexican Americans resemble the
dominant immigrant culture.
-
On the other hand, much of Mexico's historic
experience with the USA resembles the experience of the Native Americans: much
of the United States, including Texas, was once Mexico.
-
Does a Mexican who moves
from Juarez to El Paso truly immigrate? In any case, it’s not just another
immigrant story.
Objective 6: Minorities and Language
To study minority writers' and speakers' experiences with
literacy & influence on literature and language.
6a. To regard literacy as the primary code of modern existence
and a key or path to empowerment. (See obj. 3 on assimilation /
resistance)
6b. To emphasize how all speakers and writers use literary devices such as narrative and figures of speech.
6c. To discover literature's power to express
the minority voice and vicariously share minority experience.
6d. To assess minorities' status in the "canon"
or curriculum of what is read and taught in schools
6e. To note variations of standard English by minority
writers and speakers.
6f. To translate the
"Dominant-Minority" relation to philosophical or syntactic categories of
"Subject & Object," in which the "subject" is self-determining and
active in terms of "voice and choice," while the "object" is acted upon,
passive, or spoken for rather than acting and speaking.
|