LITR 4232 American Renaissance: Emerson
|
Today's agenda review representative literature & obj. 1 assignments presentation: Martin
Terms: |
|
Fuller and Emerson are grouped together because they were friends and worked together as founders and editors of The Dial, the leading journal of "Transcendentalist" literature and criticism in the antebellum period.
Thursday, 2 October: Ralph Waldo Emerson 1106-1113: introduction + opening 5 pages of Nature; 1163-68: opening 5 pages of “Self-Reliance”
Text-Objective Discussion: Martin Bidegaray
Course
Objectives:
1. To use "close reading" and "Historicism" as ways of studying classic, popular, and representative literature and cultural history of the "American Renaissance" (the generation before the Civil War).
2. To study the movement of "Romanticism," the narrative genre of "romance," and the related styles of the "gothic" and "the sublime." (The American Renaissance is the major period of American Romantic Literature.)
3. To use literature as a basis for discussing representative problems and subjects of American culture (Historicism), such as equality (race, gender, class); modernization and tradition; the individual, family; and community; nature; the role of writers in an anti-intellectual society.
review representative literature & obj. 1
1. To use "close reading" and "Historicism" as ways of studying classic, popular, and representative literature and cultural history of the "American Renaissance" (the generation before the Civil War).
purpose: distinguish racial ideology and practice
(ideology = what people think automatically, habitually; practice = what they actually do or how they behave
standard example of conflict: family values + divorce)
recall racial issue at end of Last of the Mohicans
If Cora & Uncas become a couple, child would mix African, European, Indian bloods
Denied!
But check out Apess 1051
Representative literature raises issues that classical literature ignores, that conflict with ideology (in this case, of racial purity)
What else about representative literature?
assignments
Tuesday, 7 October: "First-Wave Feminism." Margaret Fuller 1637-1659, introduction + from "The Great Lawsuit"; 1675-76: "Fourth of July"; Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Declaration of Sentiments.
Fuller as leading feminist intellectual of pre-Civil War America
Stanton as important writer, activist for women's rights w/ Susan B. Anthony
Fuller:
How representative? How classic?
How Transcendental? (esp., How can this style or way of thinking be turned to gender issues?)
Stanton:
1848 Women's Rights meeting at Seneca Falls, New York
Compare audience reaction to Sojourner Truth--compare "hate radio"
Compare Declaration of Sentiments to Declaration of Independence
Then back to representative literature
Thursday, 9 October: Harriet Jacobs 1808-29, from Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl
introducing Emerson
"founding father of American literature"--about 15 years younger than Cooper and Irving, another 15 years older than Whitman, Melville, Douglass
somewhat popular author and public figure during lifetime--even people who didn't read him attended his lectures, knew his name
profoundly influential on contemporary and later writers--inspiring, liberating, but deeply rooted thinker
connected American literature to European Romantic thought--visited Europe as a young man, met Coleridge, Carlyle, others
personally, a conscientious, perceptive man who kept his friends and encouraged creativity
former Unitarian minister
long-term influences:
Creates or crystallizes ways of thinking identified with American life or culture:
self-reliance, individualism
correspondence with nature
perpetual revolution and change as creativity, but not reflexive or automatic
creates a way of thinking that sounds or seems religious but is not limited to any single religion
(Most of the intellectual structures are familiar, though, either from High Protestant Christianity or from classical thought such as Neo-Platonic mysticism.)
Somewhat satisfies desire for religious loftiness while not being exactly limited to any particular religion
Literature as "form"
Last class, question of how to make different kinds of literature meet in the same course.
Recent trends threaten too much difference: historicism and multiculturalism--tendency to move from one thing to another, covering as much as possible but not sure why you're reading one author or group and not another--
standard pattern of resistance: tradition . . . I want my kids to read what I read. (works for teachers as well as parents.)
Question: how to cover a range of expected material while maintaining coherence / cohesion and teaching critical thinking skills?
Many answers with many variations, but they often return to
language: terms, meaning > forms
Example from last class: We were struggling with how to coordinate different materials and responses to classic and representative literature
Recognized difficulty, how much to be learned, but came together briefly at end with example of "sublime" in Sojourner Truth (Stowe article, 2604)
Can different languages, cultures, traditions meet in form?
For instance, does "the sublime" describe something that may appear under different terms or names but we can recognize as related to our own categories of experience or knowledge?
Not a silver bullet, but increases possibility of convergence rather than divergence.
How accomplished?
Establish terms . . .
Gothic, sublime, Transcendentalism, correspondence . . . and "forms"
"Form" as meeting or action of spirit and matter.
E. g., "the sublime"
Instructor: "something that exceeds normal language or categories of thought"
"pleasure and pain mixed"
Don't cop out by saying "Literature lets everybody be right, doesn't matter if you're wrong."
> unity of terms permits diversity and range of thought; diverse world meets on terms and forms
later today:
"sublime" in Emerson
"Transcendentalism" > "to transcend"
"correspondence"
aphorism, wise saying, epigram, proverb, motto, maxim
Emerson as classic writer?
(category of comparison) |
Classic Literature or “Old Canon” |
Representative Literature or “New Canon” |
Other codes or identifying terms |
“Great Authors”; “DWEMs”; “Great White Fathers” “Excellence” |
“women
and people of color”; “under-represented” or “marginalized” |
Spoken / literate cultural traditions |
Long traditions of literacy (often through old Protestant denominations) |
Oral or spoken traditions from non-literate, traditional cultures; sometimes (as with women writers) alternative written traditions or genres |
Education |
“highly educated,” “best schools,” learning as gentlemanly leisure, taste, class |
Self-educated (Douglass), privately educated (upper-class women), or “mission schools” (esp. Indians but also blacks); irregular education (Lincoln) |
genres |
“belles lettres”: fiction, poetry, drama |
“Activist” texts: autobiography, memoir, “people’s history”; non-fiction |
religion |
“cool” religion: symbolic, private, allusive; remembered, not vital; highly literate |
“hot” religion: immediate, vivid, personal; vehicle for assertion of status, equality; often more oral than literate but also often an introduction to literacy |
“voice” |
“official voice”: rational, controlled, depths of power |
Unofficial, sometimes more emotional or seeking way to express previously unexpressed attitudes |
style |
Refined, self-conscious, knowledgeable of literary tradition |
Eccentric; comes in and out of focus; conflicting demands on voice |
Control over text |
“great author” as “creator” of text, master of control (often well connected to publishers) |
Problems of authenticity; text is often “layered” by other writers’ hands, editors’ and readers’ expectations |
Aphorism
synonyms for aphorisms:
wise sayings
proverbs
motto
maxim
American wise
man—cf. Franklin, Twain, Will Rogers
Trust thyself
Whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist
a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds
Question: What if any connection between "wise sayings" and Emerson's continuing popularity?
Correspondence
Webster's definition:
1. Act or state of corresponding; relation or agreement of things to each other or of one thing to another.
2. Intercourse between persons by letters
3. The letters which pass between correspondents.
to correspond
1. To answer (to something else) in fitness, character, function, amount, etc.; to suit, agree, fit, or match.
2. To have communication esp. by letters
Concept important to Romanticism:
correspondence between moods of nature and moods of human
1518 every hour and change corresponds to and authorizes a different state of the mind
Other ways of thinking about correspondence:
inside-outside reflect and inform each other
Most standard formulation: outside world influences inside:
"Who can be gloomy on a nice day like this?"
i. e., psychology corresponds to environment
But can be turned around
e. g., you're having love troubles, you go outside and hear the birds singing . . .
"The very birds mock me!"
From Legend of Sleepy Hollow
2097 every sound of
nature, at that witching hour, fluttered his excited imagination
2107 sank deep in the
mind of Ichabod
2108 all the
stories of ghosts and goblins . . . came crowding upon his recollection. The
night grew darker and darker
Poe often uses this outward-flowing correspondence
poisoned mind affects perceptions of outside world
Also see in Wordsworth, British Romantics
Back to Emerson
1518 nature always wears the colors of the spirit
Usefulness of understanding idea of correspondence, besides Romantic literature
People think like this whether they know the word or not.
But if you *know* that you and other people think like this, you start to get control of it, can analyze and master your thoughts instead of just being carried away and going natural
Critical thinking
an intellectual figure
cf. parallelism that we did in Cooper by superimposing
gothic color scheme of dark, light, and red
on American racial categories of black, white, red
Identifying Transcendentalism
as
a movement in American Renaissance Literature
The Web of American Transcendentalism (Virginia Commonwealth University)
Project in American Literature on Transcendentalism
“Transcendentalism” is a big, baggy word that can mean many different things. In the simplest historical terms, it’s a name for a loosely associated group of intellectuals, writers, and religious or social leaders in New England in the 1830s-1850s who shared similar backgrounds, styles, and interests.
Most important figures: Emerson, Fuller, Thoreau
Next in importance: Bronson Alcott (father of Louisa May Alcott), Theodore Parker, Charles Ripley, Henry James Senior, Jones Very.
Sometimes other American Renaissance writers are included because of stylistic or thematic resemblances in their literature, plus some of this group were personally acquainted with the Transcendentalists.*
What these Transcendentalists had in common:
Pastors, members, or children of members of the Unitarian Church, in which Transcendentalism may be seen as a movement.
Emerson is at the center of the movement: most Transcendentalists were his friends or professional acquaintances.
History of the Unitarian Church:
17th century: Puritanism
(Congregational Church) >
late 18th century, early 19th
century: Congregationalism (Trinitarian) + Unitarian
1830s-1850s: Unitarianism > Transcendentalism
How do we get from Puritanism to
Transcendentalism?
“Puritanism” is generally a bad word in modern discourse, and “hip” literary people usually shun Puritanism reflexively. But students of American literature and culture have to build a respectful relationship with the Puritans for the following reasons:
1. Puritans were highly literate people. If you’re a student of early American literature and culture, New England has far more records and texts to study than any other part of the USA. New England has continued to produce the most important writers to American literature. (Beyond the American Renaissance, think Robert Frost, e e cummings, Sylvia Plath, Elizabeth Bishop, Thomas Pynchon.)
2. If most literary people are less than gung-ho about America’s possible image as an aggressively capitalist, imperialist nation, New England is among the only parts of the country founded for reasons other than economic opportunity a consistent home for movements involving Abolition of slavery, Women’s Rights, Pacifism, religious tolerance, and environmentalism.
How did the Puritans turn into “Yankee
Liberals?”
Puritanism in New England. A “hot” church or religious movement “cools off.”
17th century: Puritanism as part of Protestant Reformation. Boston as the “City on a Hill,” the “City of God” > Salem Witch Trials
18th century: Enlightenment, Age of Reason. As education spreads, the western world opens to increasing knowledge of other religions besides Christianity and regret over excesses of religious behavior (e. g., Salem Witch Trials). “Unitarianism” appears as an attempt to recognize the “unity” of God throughout nature and the world and to “rationalize” religious behavior (e. g., to improve ethics and social justice rather than prepare for the hereafter).
Historical Note: Unitarianism is never a large, mass movement; its influence derives from social prestige and intellectual depth. At the same time that Unitarianism is emerging as a “cool” religion, “hot” religions such as Methodism, Southern Baptistry, Mormonism, the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the Seventh-Day Adventists are starting to bubble up all over the country. (“Hot” religions tend to emphasize individual salvation and the wellbeing of their religious community; “cool” religions tend to emphasize social justice on a larger scale.)
Peak period of Unitarianism: late 1700s, early 1800s.
Emergence of Transcendentalism:
1830s-50s.
Is Transcendentalism a religion?
Obviously some religious themes, but never organized enough institutionally to
become a religion of its own. You could call it a religious movement, but not a
religion.
Why can public schools study Transcendentalism and not Baptistry or Mormonism?
*literary prestige
*”universality” of religious themes and images—its range of reference isn’t restricted to one religion
*no conversion motive: rather than draw a person to a particular way of thinking, Transcendentalism seeks for each individual to come to terms with whatever’s at work inside.
*Why religious conservatives can still
gripe: Transcendentalism can sound like “New Age” thinking in its imagery of
self-liberation and its diverse religious traditions—though New Age writing
tends to be much lazier. Also, Unitarianism and Transcendentalism can be said to
resemble “secular humanism” in terms of de-emphasizing a supreme divine
authority beyond the human realm.
Genres: mostly non-fiction and poetry. Non-fiction may extend from Emerson’s essays to Thoreau’s intellectual memoirs to Fuller’s blend of essay and autobiography to sermons by Transcendentalist pastors.
Sometimes other American Renaissance
writers are included because of stylistic or thematic resemblances in their
literature, plus some of this group were personally acquainted with the
Transcendentalists.*
*Whitman is the most frequent inclusion.
His reading of Emerson was essential to his intellectual growth (“I was
simmering, simmering, simmering . . . . Emerson brought me to a boil.”). When
Whitman mailed Emerson a first edition of Leaves
of Grass, Emerson wrote him back: “I greet you at the beginning of a great
career.” Emerson’s essay “The Poet” appears to anticipate the changes
Whitman makes in American poetry.
*Hawthorne and Melville are sometimes
categorized as “Dark Transcendentalists” (compared to Emerson, Thoreau, and
Whitman as “Light Transcendentalists”). Hawthorne knew Emerson and lived in
Concord (home of Emerson and Thoreau), and some of Hawthorne’s and
Melville’s symbols and themes may resemble those of Transcendentalism. But he
and Melville were more critical than supportive of Transcendentalism, and they
primarily wrote fiction rather than the genres associated with
Transcendentalism.
*Occasionally, listings will include American Renaissance writers as diverse as Emily Dickinson and Frederick Douglass among the Transcendentalists. Doubtless these authors read Emerson and other Transcendentalists, and some resemblances can be found between their patterns of thought and imagery and those of the Transcendentalists. But in such applications “Transcendentalism” becomes so broad that the term loses any historical specificity and begins to blur differences for the sake of emphasizing unity—which sounds like what the Transcendentalists were often about!
Some markers of Transcendentalist style and thought:
transcendence as spirit above material world:
1517 stars, presence of the sublime
1518 a higher thought or a better emotion
mystical union
1555 [Unitarianism] Moses, Plato, Milton
1518 I am part and particle of God
In many respects, Transcendentalism simply overlaps Romanticism—but it’s Romanticism that develops out of Puritanism.
1516 Nature and the Soul
1517 child
Correspondence
1518 every hour and change corresponds to and authorizes a different state of the mind
1518 nature always wears the colors of the spirit
Sublime
1518 glad to the brink of fear
cf. Truth 2533 met God, burning [sublime?]
1518 transparent eye-ball
1518 man beholds somewhat as beautiful as his own nature
Individualism
"Self-Reliance,"
non-conformity
ultimately connect: Edwards
"Sinners" 643
Personal Narrative 633
Emerson as post-Revolutionary "religion"
religion for a secular society?
Introduce
Emerson
"father" of Am lit
Only 1 class! But if you keep studying American literature, you'll keep encountering Emerson
Influence on other writers
Tradition of learning
Classical learning esp. Plato & Judeochristianity
Never underestimate, keep returning
Like Cooper, always been in print, always in libraries, schools
International in influences
Classic writer, plus among first to define and explore central American issues such as individualism, nature, living religion--
Why should we not also enjoy an original relation to the universe?
still a somewhat radical thinker, the more you read the more you see
If you want to think well, you need to know what's been thought before; but to think really well, you need to be ready to think fresh
("You have to know the rules to break them right.")
Also popular within his genres
Essays as lectures / sermons
Atheneum, lecture circuit
Inspirational writing
"essential man" for Transcendentalist
movement--many writers were inspired by Emerson and circulated around him
Sublime
glad to the brink of fear
cf. Truth 2604 met God, burning [sublime?]
transparent eye-ball
Assignments
Elizabeth Cady Stanton, 1815-1902
Nature
1517 stars, presence of the sublime
1517 child
1518 every hour and change corresponds to and authorizes a different state of the mind
1518 glad to the brink of fear
cf. Truth 2533 met God, burning [sublime?]
1518 transparent eye-ball
1518 man beholds somewhat as beautiful as his own nature
1518 nature always wears the colors of the spirit
[mystical experience]
[correspondence]
"Self-Reliance"
1555 [Unitarianism] Moses, Plato, Milton
divine idea which each of us represents
Trust thyself
creation/creator riff
nonchalance of boys who are sure of a dinner
youth and man
healthy attitude of human nature
society as conspiracy, joint-stock company
Make the
traditions talk to each other
1517 stars, presence of the sublime
1518 glad to the brink of fear
2533 met God, burning [sublime?]
ultimately connect: Edwards
"Sinners" 643
Personal Narrative 633
Emerson as post-Revolutionary "religion"
Deism > Unitarianism [>Transcendentalism]
+ growth of western religions: Baptist, Methodist
Fuller as differing from Emerson's "universal truth"
spirit
Nature
original relation to the universe
insight and not tradition
perfection of the creation
speculative men are esteemed unsound and frivolous
Nature and the Soul
solitude
stars
sublime
[mystical experience]
[correspondence]
child
every hour and change corresponds to and authorizes a different state of the mind
woods = perpetual youth
transparent eyeball [unity]
part and particle of man
occult relation
“Self-Reliance”
Unitarianism] Moses, Plato, Milton
inmost becomes outmost
divine idea which each of us represents
Trust thyself
creation/creator riff
nonchalance of boys who are sure of a dinner
youth and man
healthy attitude of human nature
society as conspiracy, joint-stock company
man = nonconformist
epigram
large societies and dead institutions
college of fools, meeting-houses
great man, crowd, independence of solitude
screens x man
cultivated classes > feminine rage [feminization of American culture]
harlot
aged ladies
consistency as hobgoblin
Unitarianism--Socrates, Jesus, Newton
To be great is to be misunderstood
contradictions
[family romance]
soul + divine spirit x-helps
lives with nature
resolution of all into the ever blessed ONE
God is here within
relations > self
a man is the word made flesh
the divinity of man
[noble savage]
“Hymn sung . . .”
rebels--Spirit
nature's sublimity
shaft!--sires, sons
assignments
review classic and representative
self-improvement, finer things x voice for group, basic rights
2048 few women in those days who dared to “speak in meeting”
cf. Cora
Fuller—read 1714-1724
Fuller & Stanton; power of "other voices" to change story, perspective, inclusiveness
Fuller as Transcendentalist, but how change "Romantic individualism?"
1580 edited Dial
Stanton as suffragist campaigner, how change Declaration of Independence?
cultural history:
compare Emerson & Fuller—different paths to intellectual leadership?
Competing or cooperating minorities? (women, Indians, Af Ams)
references to Declaration, equality for all
style:
How romantic?
Natural imagery, emergence of individual
Life as romance?
Read Fuller's intro, very powerful presence, compare Truth
review classic & representative literature > introduce Emerson
One of big concerns in Literature courses these days is, Who do you read?
Answer has lots of implications about kind of education you’re getting, the kind of school you’re going to and its positioning in the so-called culture wars.
What kind of balance between nation's founding by wealthy European men and evolving future as multicultural nation?
how shaking out in education system?
Old canon of "classic literature" still dominates, especially in college prep courses.
Why?
Practical answers:
Teachers teach what they they were taught
College-educated parents typically expect their children to read what they read (insofar as they're conscious of this at all).
Academic answers:
"Excellence" argument: classic writers generally rise from deep traditions of writing. Social advantages can raise performance levels.
Emphasis on "single tradition" enables attention to specific literary forms (e. g., gothic, sublime, romance)
But . . . some contrary pressures:
"Old Canon" primarily associated with eastern, European(-American) or "Anglo" tradition
Student population is increasingly non-Anglo, especially in the West and Southwest
Effort to get students to "read anything, not just the classics"
> authors with whose experiences and appearances the new student population can identify: "people of color," "street vs. academy," "outsiders, not insiders"
Discussion with School of Education faculty regarding ExCET tests for teacher certification: test-takers need to know Shakespeare and Sandra Cisneros and Gary Soto
our resolution?
Old canon still dominates, but adding in new voices, > dialogue
problem: reading spread thin, “coverage” problem--spending 1 day on Emerson would make my professors frown!
Problem: often the most classic writers are the most intellectually challenging, least popular with students
representative writers often tell a simpler, more dramatic story (Jacobs and Douglass slave narratives will stir more powerful emotions than Emerson and Fuller)
Problem with setting up a course like American Renaissance:
Do you learn how to read carefully and in depth,
or do you cover a lot of ground & become
familiar with a lot of writers?
provisional solution: Read authors in pairs, keep all the texts open, make the texts talk to each other.
Spending only one day on Emerson, but relate Fuller & Whitman back to him, keep him ready for reference.