LITR 4326 Early American Literature

Research Posts 2016
(research post assignment)


Research Post 2

Alexis Young

Charles Brockden Brown: Who Are You?

            Before this class, I had never heard of Charles Brockden Brown. My interest was sparked when I realized that his name was scattered throughout the course site and piqued when the professor suggested that he was “Poe before Poe”. I began to wonder: who was C. B. Brown and why was he so influential? The course site details his attempt to be the first American citizen to make a career as a novelist and distinctly developing American national literature. However, I wanted to know why C. B. Brown stood out more prominently than other American writers from his time and why I had not heard about him, despite his importance.

            “Our Founding Novelist” by Anne Trubek discusses Brown in a light that was very fitting for the dimness surrounding what I knew about him. The article opens by acknowledging that there is a certain confusion associated with him. She describes learning about Brown, as well as reading his first novel, Wieland, with “feeling a bit of historical vertigo … a common reaction.” In connection to the professor’s Poe comment, she calls him “the first professional writer in America.” Wieland is rather strange; not only does the novel tell the story of a man who murders his family, but contains instances with ventriloquism and psychological degeneration. Through her references to multiple critics’ comments on his work, an understanding of the mystery surrounding Brown begins to come unearthed. Aside from his literary background, the article includes insight on his historical background. Dabbling in more than literature, Brown was also writing political works. Ultimately, Trubek claims that his horror stories are “overlooked … because it is very hard to get one’s head around.” Especially, at a time as early as his; however, the oddity found within Wieland did not stop it from becoming “a founding text of American Gothic.”

            Much information is available on the Charles Brockden Brown Society website. The site opens with a brief summary of Brown, stating, “Charles Brockden Brown … has earned a general reputation as the early republic’s most ambitious and accomplished literary figure,” before listing the various types of writing he published. The CBBS was founded as an international scholarly organization in order to create more interest in his work, suggesting that overlooking Brown’s literature has been a common occurrence. Under “Brown’s Life,” more than a simple life summary is offered. The text states, “Brown’s early life and development are shaped on all levels by the conflicts and transformations of the late Enlightenment and American Revolution,” which is very relevant when considering that the other work on Brown has implied that his literature is very reflective of society when properly assessed.

            Encylopædia Britannica confirms Charles Brockden Brown as the “father of the American novel.” His life before his major novels is summarized, similar to the previous work on him. He came from Quaker parents and took his studies very seriously. Eventually, he was apprentice to a lawyer in Philadelphia, but was still strongly drawn to writing, leading him to found a literary society. He eventually left law in pursuit of a career in literature. In regards to Wieland, the encyclopedia states, the novel “shows the ease with which mental balance is lost when the test of common sense is not applied to strange experiences.” Upon reading this, surprisingly, short entry on Brown, I was reminded of the entire reason I initially wanted to look into him—the importance of his influence is very apparent, but there is very little detail surrounding his literary efforts.

            To me, it seems that Charles Brockden Brown is still vague or unknown to many people. However, I definitely feel that I have a deeper understanding of why that is. Also, it seems as though research and work on his literature has picked up over the last decade or so. As I learned more about Brown, I realized his style (horror, gothic, etc.) was very strong, and very strange, when compared to social norms of his time. Therefore, I believe that the oddity and confusion surrounding his texts have lead to him being overlooked for so long. He was very in tune with the political events surrounding him and the people of American, which I think is a very important point to make in any future research, education, etc. on Brown. If I continued my research, I would next actually read Wieland and Edgar Huntly. Also, I would compare and contrast Gothic literature before and after Brown’s contributions.