LITR 4326 Early American Literature

Research Posts 2016
(research post assignment)


Research Post 2

Eric Howell

5 April 2016

The Blessing and Curse of Thomas Paine

Thomas Paine and his work Common Sense are often portrayed as the great spark that launched American colonists into action in their pursuit of freedom throughout the American narrative, and quickly after, that great spark fades into an afterthought. Upon completing my first research post, I felt as if I had pinpointed the reasons behind Paine's minimal acknowledgment throughout American history and equated these reasons as the reaction to Paine's fierce antagonism towards the world's religions, including the dominant religious culture of the newly birthed nation: Christianity. However, in light of further research and analysis, I believe that, perhaps, there is more to the story of Thomas Paine and his fraction of American glory.

As I read Josh Cobb’s research post Thomas Paine: The Silenced Critic, I felt as if I had jumped right into what Cobb describes as “popular perception” by rationalizing that Paine was a heretic and staunch critic of popular beliefs and therefore did not fit the American narrative and was cast out of American history. Cobb’s post insinuated that perhaps Paine's religious views and aspects were not completely to blame for the author being written out of American history, but perhaps it was Paine himself and his views towards America that garnered the role of American outcast.  I had not considered the perspective that while Paine was distancing himself from America, attempting to spread freedom throughout Europe, his admiration for the nation diminished as well.

Upon searching for the reasoning behind Paine's hostility toward America, I discovered that he did not necessarily despise the nation, but rather, vehemently disapproved of the newly formed government, led by George Washington. In an open letter to Washington, Letter to George Washington, Paine lets his dissatisfaction with the inaugural president be known stating,

Monopolies of every kind marked your administration almost in the moment of its commencement. The lands obtained by the Revolution were lavished upon partisans; the interest of the disbanded soldier was sold to the speculator… In what fraudulent light must Mr. Washington’s character appear in the world, when his declarations and his conduct are compared together!

Paine’s signature fervor within his writing does not cool off even when addressing the President of the United States of America, in a time where most held Washington in the highest of regards.

To Paine, the newly established government reeked of aristocracy and left room for the opportunity of an unjust, undemocratic political system to take control, a system very similar to what the young nation just broke away from. It should be noted that throughout his letter to Washington, Paine makes mention of his constant thought of America and the potential greatness the young country possess though he does not hold high hopes for the future of the nation when regarding the newly birthed political system. From Paine's tone, one can inference the angst and displeasure he possesses is directed toward the political elite and not the nation as a whole.

          Paine’s ferocious views of Washington may have been fueled by his imprisonment in France, where Washington neglected to free Paine, even though he claimed American citizenship, but his anger with the American government was propelled by what he deemed stark similarities shared between English monarchy. In Paine’s work Rights of Man, Paine condemns any form of government which uses hereditary tendencies to elect new leaders. He also points out in his letter to Washington that John Adams was in favor of such systems, based on what Paine described as Adam’s ignorance. Although I could not find many sources that addressed Paine's dissatisfaction head-on, the conclusion can be made that Paine felt that the characteristics of the post-revolution government in America and old English rule were too close for comfort for him.

          For Paine, he felt that the new Federalist leaders of the American nation favored and sided with England too much, and neglected to acknowledge France as the allied nation who helped America gain their independence. The Federalists’ grotesquely one-sided Jay Treaty exemplifies this favor. Paine and many other Americans felt as if they had given up too much to Britain without receiving anything in return. The Thomas Paine National Historical Association depicts the treaty as America giving in to England and letting them have their way by stating that John Jay “agreed to the prohibition of export from the United States… [and] also agreed to permit British creditors to collect private debts from southern planters in America,” essentially, so that American ships could gain entry into British-controlled waters.

          Paine and many other Americans were appalled that the newly appointed officials seemingly gave back so much power to an empire they had relentlessly fought against for freedom, less than twenty years before. At this time, Paine was in full support of the French Revolution and often harbored much sympathy for the French nation as he saw many similarities between France's story and America's. When the Jay Treaty was established, France was at war with Britain, as was Paine. England was attempting to persecute Paine for Rights of Man; writings they felt were treasonous and dangerous to the British Empire. Paine felt as if his former countrymen had turned their backs on him just as they had done to the French.

          In conclusion, Thomas Paine played perhaps the most influential role in American history, yet his rebellious nature and cynical views of both religion and government were a combination that kept him from his true legacy in American history. Paine spoke his mind freely, never faltering, no matter who the audience was. I feel that more research is necessary but that one can draw the conclusion that both Paine and America were going their separate ways, and Paine’s counter-culture ideas were out of step with the great men of his time, thus driving a wedge between the nation and the great author. This noble, uncanny characteristic was his blessing and his curse.

Works Cited

Cobb, Josh. Thomas Paine: The Silenced Critic. March 26th, 2014. Research Post 1.

Thomas Paine National Historical Association. Observation on Jay’s Treaty.

Accessed April 5, 2016. http://thomaspaine.org/essays/american-politics-&-government/observations-on-jay-s-treaty.html

Paine, Thomas. Common Sense, Rights of Man, And Other Essential Writings of Thomas Paine. New York: Penguin, 2003. 163-207. Print. 

Paine, Thomas. Letter to George Washington. July 30th, 1796. http://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/ecco/004829307.0001.000/1:3?rgn=div1;view=fulltext