Burgundy Anderson
Race to the White House: 1800
Political elections for the United States are nothing new in 2016. We are all
familiar with the race to the Office of President; the glitz, the glam, and the
mudslinging. The race is seen as a normal part of our lives every 4 years. Yet
my whole life I have heard that presidential elections were never something
intended by the Founders. Religion was not supposed to play a role in politics,
but the Founders didn’t want Science playing a major role either. I wanted to
know if this was true, how our political parties began, and how the first
presidential race developed.
Our
first president, George Washington, hated the idea of political parties. In his
mind, parties were nothing more than “factions” of the United States’ populace.
According to many of the other Founders, including James Madison, political
parties were necessary to maintain a democratic union. Alexander Hamilton
considered political parties necessary but recognized there was a slippery
slope: “Give all power to the many and they will oppress the few. Give all power
to the few and they will oppress the many. Both therefore ought to have power,
that each may defend itself against the other.” For the first few elections of
the United States’ union, Washington had his way, with no parties, and a fairly
simple democratic process (although it was not all-inclusive).
By
the election of 1800, however, we had two political parties going head to head
for the presidency. In 1794 the politicians of the day began to separate
themselves based on ideas of government size, the economy, and desired social
structures. The “Federalist” party was formed by Alexander Hamilton while Thomas
Jefferson’s sympathizers were known as the “Democratic Republicans.” The
defining difference in the parties was the main belief about the size of the
federal government. Jefferson argued strongly against a large central
government, and believed that agrarian values would keep the country independent
and peaceful. Hamilton, of course, held that a strong central government was the
only way for the system “to work for all the people and to counter self-interest
and greed” (Hakim).
Thomas Jefferson ran on the Democratic Republican ticket and John Adams ran on
the Federalist Ticket. The two men had been spending time together since they
had written the Declaration of Independence. As the 13 colonies, under the
Articles of Confederation, waged a Revolt against the tyrannical rule of Great
Britain, John Adams spent his time in France, negotiating for help alongside
Benjamin Franklin. As the war drew to a close, Jefferson joined Franklin in
France as an ambassador of the newly founded country. They also worked together
to create the Constitution of the United States after the Articles of
Confederation failed. Despite having
extremely different stances on most aspects of government, the two were able to
come together to create basic laws to guide the nation. Unfortunately, this good
will between the two did not last long.
When
the two men ran against each other for the office of president, they hurled
accusations about one another around. The country itself was in the midst of
extreme turmoil “reeling from the terrors of the French Revolution, and on the
brink of war with France” (Larson). The political party lines were still forming
when Jefferson said Adams and his Federalists would squelch liberty for the
average American citizen and elevate the upper-class into governing, which he
saw as a potential for the birth of a British-like monarchy. Adams countered
that the Republican-Democrats, with Jefferson’s aide, would further throw the
country into chaos by giving too much power to everybody, and that Jefferson
would debase the role religion played in American lives.
It is
very easy to see how this race to the White House has shaped our modern
politics. The massive split in ideas of how to best take care of the American
populace is an issue which still rages on in debates. The question of big
government or small government has always haunted the nation. Even the race
itself has not changed very much, two candidates running against one another for
the masses’ votes. I do not think it was ever the intention of the Founders for
the office of the President to have as much power as it does or to be fought
over as much as it is, but when passions get caught up, it is difficult to
separate oneself from the politics of the situation.
Works Cited
"1800 Presidential Election." Archives.gov. N.p., n.d. Web. 2 Apr. 2016.
"The Election of 1800." Ushistory.org. Independence Hall Association,
n.d. Web. 1 Apr. 2016.
Hakim, Joy. "Revolution." Freedom: A History of US. Oxford: Oxford UP,
2003. 41-45. Print.
Larson, Edward J. A Magnificent Catastrophe: The Tumultuous Election of 1800,
America's First Presidential Campaign. New York City: Simon and Schuster,
2007. Print.
|