Zach Thomas
3/26/14
Slaves Have a Voice
My interest in slaves and their background brought me to a place where I
can focus on their literature. Unlike that of the dominant culture’s literature
and even that of captivity narratives, slave narratives focus on a deeper aspect
of kidnapping and the voices within this struggle. What initially struck my
attention was the movie 12 Years a Slave,
which focused on a free man’s account of being sold into slavery in the late
1800’s. I learned quickly that our course focuses on slave narratives that were
even before the story of Solomon Northup and that much of its literature
revolves around slavery and overcoming it. We will center in on the question:
why are slave narratives uniquely beneficial unlike any other literature?
Slave narratives are unique in how they focus on a minority that seeks to
gain freedom from their current bondage. While doing some research, I found that
most, if not all slave narratives say the same things and incorporate the former
statement of wishing to be freed and able to make their own decisions in that
freedom. The slave narratives focus specifically on the Africans who were
brought to America to be as property for the dominant culture. They are taught
how to write and even read by their masters. It brings to light the difference
this literature has on the dominant culture’s literature. “Of the slave
narratives, one must ask: who is entitled to claim, to possess these lives? In
whose language do they appear?” (Sekora 485). Sekora reports that these
individuals who are under their master’s authority gain the right to learn and
to write only under their master’s choice. The literature that was found in
slaves’ diaries was to show the condition they were under, their hope for
freedom, and their growing anxiety to gain knowledge. Slaves were very inclined
to find time to talk of their new life in America. Taken across the world in
boats to a life where they were not free to do anything but work is the hard
reality they faced. Unlike captivity narratives, which depicted mostly women’s
capture by Native Americans, slaves were taken from their continent and brought
to a new world where they had no hopes of returning home. Dominant literature is
very exclusive when it speaks of the other races that filled America’s borders.
Slave narratives seem to encompass that the new world they live in is dependent
on all who reside there. Frances Smith Foster suggests that “the protagonists
exhibit more strength and more inclination to fight and to think their ways to
freedom—independent of white support.” (x). Slaves began writing in hopes of
freedom and hopes of becoming educated beyond the constraints of living under
someone’s constant authority. Slaveholders not only stole from slaves their
physical freedoms, but also their freedoms to achieve higher learning that could
benefit the country as a whole.
There are arguments that slave narratives were not a genre of literature
because of the repetitive content that they contained. Yet they help define the
struggle that the minorities face in America. Being that slaves had no real back
story in America at this point, they were self-perpetuating their existence in
writing. Russ Castronovo depicts slaves in this way by saying “slave narratives
stand as acts of self-authorship precisely because their authors had no
patriarchal legacy that would inscribe their bodies and their memories with a
citizen’s rights, duties, or legitimacy” (29).
Slaves tend to be seen as illegitimate and silent in their servitude.
With the absence of literacy, slaves could not have a voice amidst a dominant
culture in America. Slave narratives focus on the present age and their
circumstances in that moment. Looking back in the past was not beneficial for
those who really did not feel like they would have a legacy to leave, most
didn’t. These narratives are a cry for hope, a plea for freedom, and a
desperation for rights to all Africans in America. Without the slave narratives,
there is suffering for minorities in general. Arna Bontemps shows the need for
slave narratives in the minority community: “The disappearance of the slave
narrative, unlike the phasing out of the minstrel show, deprived black people in
the United States of a medium of self-expression for which there was no ready
substitute” (vii). The struggle, in my opinion, goes beyond any other struggle
that was noted in other works of literature. The necessity for blacks to read of
their ancestors now is what makes America an ever-growing and ever-changing
nation. Slavery is an apparent nightmare that we cannot forget about, but should
be thought about in forms of hope and freedom.
Slave narratives are unique in benefiting the reader unlike any other
literature because there is a deep struggle uncanny to other writings. Slave
narratives also focus primarily on freedom through stories of first-hand
experiences. The different perspectives that blacks have on the new world are
unique because they are enslaved and brought to a new place. Not only that,
their narratives bring to light the reality that they will never see home again.
Slave narratives capture a particularly gruesome era in history, but those
authors were not quick to give in to the lack of rights given. These narratives
focus on overcoming the seemingly impossible in order to be educated, gain
rights as a human being, and become a unique people with thoughts and ideas that
are equal to that of the dominant culture.
·
Bontemps, Arna. Great Slave Narratives. Beacon Press, 1969. vii-xix.
eBook.
·
Castronovo, Russ. Fathering the Nation: American Genealogies of Slavery and
Freedom. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1995. 1-283. Print.
·
Foster, Frances Smith. Witnessing Slavery: The Development of Ante-bellum
Slave Narratives. 2nd ed. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1979. ix-189. eBook.
·
Sekora, John. "Black Message/White Envelope:Genre,Autheniticity, and Authority
in the Antebellum Slave Narrative." 32 (1987): 482-515. Web. 26 Mar. 2014.
|