|
(2017
midterm assignment) Sample Student Midterm Answers 2017 (Index to # 1 samples) #1: Long Essay: learning, challenges, issues |
 |
Tanner House
10/24/17
How Should We be Remembered? (Essay 1)
The concept of “Culture Wars” is a uniquely American phenomenon which
likely stems from the hectic and diverse story of American history. American
history is unique in the sense that it seemingly only began about 500 years ago,
when European explores “discovered” the new world, and in the time that has
passed since then it has hurtled forward at an unprecedented rate, often leaving
entire cultures behind. The story of American history is largely incomplete,
since many of the cultures native to the continent kept no records and had no
written language, and this often leads people to disregard certain aspects and
cultures which played a very large role in the “story of us”. These once
abundant cultures are mostly gone now, and many people no longer consider them
relevant or interesting. This is a huge problem, as it leads us to not only
disregard some of the most monumentally important developments in human culture
and history, but also because it causes us to perpetuate and normalize an
objectively incorrect narrative of our history. This idea makes the study of the
true American history all the more important, and all the more interesting.
One of the primary concerns of the western conception of history is the
idea of an origin story, a definitive tale of our roots and where we came from,
and we have plenty of them. Revelation, Prometheus, and even the theory of
evolution are all common and widely known stories and explanations for who we
are and where we came from. These are all also ideas that have a number of
similar overarching themes, likely meaning that there is some idea of conception
or creation that is a human universal. The dominance of the Anglo Saxon culture
in America has resulted in a particularly European flavor which lingers in our
myths and stories, and it is beginning to leave a bad taste in our mouths. Many
of the ideas which get credited to the Anglo Saxon culture clearly did not
originate, or were not original to, said culture. If we take a look at any of
the Native American origin stories which we have studied this semester, the
common themes of creation and purpose found in the European creation myths are
prevalent in the Native American creation myths as well. So why are the European
stories romanticized while the Native American stories are often criticized, or
even outright ostracized? This idea can be explained through further study of
our course material.
John Smith’s “History of Virginia” gives us an early and immediate
example of the idea that the true narrative of American history has been
embellished and corrupted. Many of Smith’s accounts of his encounters with the
Native American people and so outlandish and absurd that they may as well be
fantastical. On a skirmish between his expedition and the native people, the
history claims, “Smith, little dreaming of that accident, being got to the
marshes at the river's head, twenty miles in the desert, had his two men slain,
as is supposed, sleeping by the canoe, whilst himself by fowling sought them
victual: finding he was beset with 200 savages, two of them he slew, still
defending himself with the aid of a savage his guide, whom he bound to his arm
with his garters, and used him as a buckler, yet he was shot in his thigh a
little, and had many arrows that stuck in his clothes; but no great hurt, till
at last they took him prisoner. When this news came to Jamestown, much was their
sorrow for his loss, few expecting what ensued.” John Smith never strapped a man
to his forearm and used him as a shield, and his prowess as a warrior was
nowhere near that of Achilles. He could not single-handedly defeat anywhere near
the number of men whom he claimed he had, and he could be killed just as easily
as the countless men who had been killed before him. John Smith’s contributions
to history are not at all unimportant, as he fulfilled a vital role in early
American history as a mediator between the Native Americans and the European
settlers. But the stretch from mediator to godlike, untouchable warrior is
pretty significant, and serves as a prime example of the corruption of the true
narrative of American history.
Just as prevalent in American history as embellishment is hypocrisy. If
we hold these truths to be self-evident, and all men are created equal, then why
was it that for a few hundred years only white men were allowed to own property,
or serve in a governmental capacity?
The concepts of liberty and equality were on the forefront on the
foundation of the new world, but only when they applied to the European settlers
who, for all intents and purposes, had invaded the continent. The “Model of
Chrisitan Charity” asserts that “There is likewise a double Law by which we are
regulated in our conversation towards another. In both the former respects, the
Law of Nature and the Law of Grace (that is, the moral law or the law of the
gospel) . . . . By the first of these laws, man as he was enabled so withal is
commanded to love his neighbor as himself. Upon this ground stands all the
precepts of the moral law, which concerns our dealings with men. To apply this
to the works of mercy, this law requires two things. First, that every man
afford his help to another in every want or distress.” As far as moral codes go,
this one does not sound so bad. It seems to lend itself quite well to a peaceful
and cooperative existence, and in many instances this was indeed the case. The
story of the history of early America is not entirely composed of deceit and
bloodshed, and there are many documented cases of productive and peaceful
coexistence between the natives and the invaders. But for every peaceful
exchange there seems to be twice as many violent ones, due largely in part to a
fundamental misunderstanding of humanity. Early America even had the best
intentions, as liberty and peace were the foundation of many of the settlements
of the new world, but hypocrisy and violence still proved too powerful
temptations.
The further the timeline of Early America progresses, the better things
seem to get. The initial upheaval that accompanied the original settlement
starts to die down, and a new way of life begins to take hold. The new American
people move past their conflicts with the natives and set their sights on
seemingly grander issues. And the grander the new issues seem, the less we pay
attention to the old ones. Who has time to talk about the systemic genocide of
an entire hemisphere of people when the heroes of American mythology were
singlehandedly putting an end to generation’s worth of tyranny and oppression?
George Washington comes off in a much better light when we paint him as a
revolutionary hero and the father of the great American democracy, which by all
accounts are both things that he was. “Washington’s wooden teeth” are a very
popular symbol in American mythology, but they also were not real. Washington’s
dentures were made of teeth that he had pulled from the mouths of slaves. Just
as much as we (often rightfully) romanticize so many aspects of our history,
perhaps now we should begin to, if not quite vilify, then at least objectify
them.
