|
Barbara Sharp
April 23, 2002 Faith,
Fear, and Exploration: A Balancing Act of the Human Spirit The cliché, "a picture is worth a thousand
words" appears to argue against any faith-based concept of destiny or
fate; it resists the notion of trust. For explorers, real and imagined, trust
in something or someone seems to be critical in overcoming their fear in
uncertain conditions. Works in the Literature of Exploration reveal a
diversity of beliefs regarding spirituality and the affect it has on the
person or persons involved in each situation. This spiritual essence ranges
from its connection with individual religious devotion to social
interdependence. In both, fiction and non-fiction works, faith and trust seem
to be the balancing forces that stabilize the emotions of anxiety and fear.
Journals from polar expeditions such as The Voyage of the Jeanette and Six
Came Back, along with the memoirs Alone and The Worst Journey in
the World show a distinct and direct interplay of differences in how trust
and faith factors into each situation. Accepting that "faith is not bound to some single
image or way of experiencing the world" (Lynch 78), explorers, like most
people in society, would have different spiritual views regarding faith. The
basis of trust is not always the same; who or what, and how much trust is
given is unique to each explorer, although the reason for trust appears to be
connected to some aspect of survival. The key to survival, insofar as faith
and trust is concerned, is indeed perceived differently by the
author-explorers in Ice, which surfaces through the language and
observations of the writer. In The Voyage of the Jeanette, the foundation of
Lieutenant George DeLong's spiritual values is characterized as he admits that
his "chart is simply useless," and he "must go on" by
"trusting in God to guide [him] to a settlement," for he and his men
"are powerless to help [themselves]" (159). Here, faith that an
omnipotent and benevolent God will aid him and his men gives this explorer
hope that they will survive. DeLong's faith is his "ultimate
intentionality [as] a Christian believer" and "[h]ope shares and
supports" his belief (32). His men, as his journal implies, share his
faith for they are "all united in saying [The] Lord's Prayer" and
"read[ing] prayers for [the] sick" even as they are slowly dying
(169). Although their situation appears hopeless as "[e]verybody [is]
pretty weak," DeLong's spiritual condition never weakens; that is, he
still clings to his faith just one week prior to his last journal entry
stating, "[r]ead part of divine services" (169). Interestingly,
their unified trust in God also extends outward to a trust in each other,
which is how DeLong and his men are able to keep each other's spirits up
instead of succumbing to emotional despair. Faith in God, however, does not eliminate DeLong and his
men's fear of imminent death. There are instances in the journal when DeLong's
tone admits to this fear; he pleads, "God help us," and confesses
that "unless He intervenes we are lost" (168). Although DeLong's
tone expresses a fair amount of fear, his faith tempers this emotion. In Images
of Faith, Lynch claims that "it is ironic that [faith] feeds so
strongly on nothingness and death" (90-91). The trick, it seems, is to
balance these two conditions. Humans naturally fear death. Many persons fear
it because they are uncertain of the question of immortality and what may
happen after they die. Traditionally, fear in the Christian sense is
manifested in God's wrath: His power over one's soul. DeLong, as a Christian,
tries "not to make too decisive a separation between the fear of God and
filial confidence in God" (Lynch 92). For DeLong and his men then, a
unified faith in God is the key to their spiritual survival; physical
survival is seen as less important. The journal entries of Sergeant David Brainard, however,
depict a contrasting image of spiritual camaraderie, faith, and trust. From
the beginning of the portion of Six Came Back in the Ice
anthology, the tone of Brainard's words emits a hint of despair and gives the
reader the sense that there is some hostility within the group. Unlike the men
of The Jeanette, there does not seem to be any spiritual foundation
unifying them as a whole; for Brainard and his comrades, trust in each other
is believed to be the essential key to their physical survival.
Throughout this piece, mistrust and faithlessness is evidenced. When Brainard
takes the time to cite that it is "an act of criminal negligence, or else
inexcusable ignorance" "if [his] government does not send a
vessel" soon (239), he instantly demonstrates his lack of faith in
others. This overall feeling is perhaps justified as he discloses how one man
"died begging forgiveness for having stolen some bacon several
weeks" before (241). In fact, much of Brainard's journal relates to food
theft and the implications of this crime. One possibly negative outcome of
this act is highlighted in a letter from a commanding officer to Brainard: Private Henry having been
repeatedly guilty of stealing the provisions of this party which is now
perishing slowly of starvation, has so far been condoned and pardoned. It is, however,
imperatively ordered that if this man be detected either eating food of any
kind not issued him regularly, or making catches, or appropriating any article
of provision, you will shoot him and report the matter to me. Any other course
would be a fatal leniency, the man being able to overpower any two of our
present force. (247) Extreme suffering can be said to be a barometer for the
spiritual side of human nature. In a group, spiritual bonding seems to
minimize feelings of hopelessness because it creates unified feelings of
reciprocity. Despair, a by-product of faithlessness, is present amongst the
men of the Jeanette because there is no spiritual foundation to hold them
together. Indeed, throughout this piece, the tone implies that there is a fear
in the finality of death. Lack of hope preempts any consideration for
spiritual survival. Fear, of course, is a natural human emotion that occurs
during crisis situations, especially when suffering from uncontrollable and
extreme conditions such as Brainard and the other men on this arctic
exploration. However, in his book, Hope: The Christian Response to Chicken
Little, Lauder explains that although "[s]ickness, suffering, and
death can cast a shadow over all human experience" and that "[t]here
is no point in denying the reality of suffering, [t]he more honest approach is
to believe that in spite of appearances[,] sickness, suffering, and death are
not the final word about human life" (85). Keeping with this idea then,
it seems clear that unlike the Jeanette expedition, Brainard and his
companions are unable to display much courtesy towards each other as their
mistrust is personified by their doubt in surviving. Their attitude
sympathizes with the belief that "death seems to make life absurd"
which counters the Christian belief that "the resurrection [of the
spirit] makes life [ . . . ] a hopeful event" (85), the perspective that
the Jeanette explorers assumed. Interestingly, this seemingly distinct difference in
spiritual attitude between the groups from The Voyage of the Jeanette
and Six Came Back does not factor in the same way for the Scott
expedition. These men are not portrayed as either having extreme devotion or
faith in any omnipotent or benevolent Being, nor do they seem to be
spiritless. In both non-fiction pieces, Scott's Last Expedition: The
Journals and The Worst Journey in the World, as well as Spufford's
blend of non-fiction with fictional narrative in I May Be Some Time,
these men's spirituality is revealed within the context of their mission. The quality that is most apparent within Scott's group
of men is the kindness between them, a sort of a spiritual camaraderie. This
is evidenced by Cherry-Garrard when he recounts how although they were all
extremely cold and it took "a long time to thaw" after getting into
their sleeping bags, a fellow explorer "insisted that [Cherry-Garrard]
should start getting his legs into [his] before he started" (73).
Just a little farther in his memoir, Cherry-Garrard explains how
"bringing [the matches] from outside into the comparatively warm
tent" is "an heroic business" praising his fellow explorer,
Birdie for "always [lighting] the candle in the morning" (73). This
kind of altruism is an extension of the trust and dependency they have between
each other. Spufford points out however, "that all this altruism makes
for a rather vulnerable social contract. You give your best, and then you rely
on the other man being equally just and self-sacrificing" (290). For this
expedition however, faith in leadership seems clearly important. The men of this expedition do not show any significant
lack of confidence in their leader, Scott. Faith and confidence are not,
however, seen as quite the same. William Gooden claims both "involve
trust, but the object of trust is typically different; [ . . . ] faith
involves not only trust, but also commitment (55). Scott's men certainly show
their commitment to him, as there are no indications that any of them try to
overrule his authority. Scott's own beliefs, however, are aligned with the idea
that scientifically-minded persons are less spiritual. Spufford states that
"Scott is not a believer, but a romantic, conscious of Nature's ambiguous
force; conscious as well as blind of its blind selecting violence" (304).
His own beliefs are much the same as the other men, but as their leader, his
decisions, based on his way of thinking, affect the entire expedition.
Spufford relates how Scott says he is "obsessed with the view of life as
a struggle for existence" (304). This admission reveals how Scott's
leadership skills may be affected by a somewhat reckless abandon instilled
within his spiritual nature. Throughout his journal, Scott attributes the
situation of the expedition on the luck of having good or bad weather
conditions which seems to relinquish him from responsibility. Spufford claims
that "in a world without God, the purpose you detect in your setbacks may
be the fearsome otherness of the natural order, orchestrated for a moment to
distinguish you" (304). Scott's belief that he and his men bear the
consequences of Nature does not bring him showing any extreme emotional
despair nor does he cling to hope when he says "the end cannot be
far" (Scott 117). The relationship between the men of the previous
expeditions discussed and how the spiritual natures they possess, both
individually and collectively, show how trust in someone outside themselves is
a key element to how they see their fate. The key to survival for Richard Byrd
is much different than these other two expeditions, for he is alone in his
ordeal. Although it may be important to note that his account is given in
retrospect, the really significant aspect of this memoir is how he details
what his thoughts were as he was experiencing his ordeal; the spiritual side
of his nature is revealed as he shares his mental struggle to override despair
and the feelings associated with isolation. Knowing that "many months
must be lived out which will be no different from the first," Byrd
determines that "if [he] is to survive-or at least keep his mental
balance-[he] must control and direct [his] thoughts" (144). His
spirituality is not grounded in religious devotion to a power beyond himself;
instead he convinces himself that keeping his spirit up is ultimately
attributed to his ability to command his mind. He knows he must not allow his
thoughts to depress him. By manipulating his thoughts, by instructing his mind
what to think on, Byrd is able to keep his mind on the present task.
"Full mastery of the impinging moment was [his] goal" (Byrd 146).
Alan Watts contends that "the root of [our] frustration is that we live
for the future, and the future is an abstraction, a rational inference from
experience, which exists only in the brain" (60). So Byrd knew he must
keep his mind from thinking on memories or possibilities because this pattern
of thinking would surely cause him to irrational thoughts of his present
situation. Therefore, he "practiced [the] preachments of a disciplined
mind [ . . . ], to focus [his] thinking on healthy, constructive images and
concepts and thus crowd out the unhealthy ones" (Byrd 146). Of course his
mind occasionally wanders into the realm of memories, but he nevertheless is
able to repress them and ultimately reaches a sensation of peace. He describes
his experience as "the sheer expanding discovery of being alive, of
growing, of no longer being afraid" (156). In all of these works eluded to from the Ice
anthology, spirituality is tied in with fear; that is fear and spirituality go
hand-in-hand. The traditional religious scheme of this connection equates fear
with God. God, as an unknown but all-powerful Being that can damn one to an
eternity in Hell certainly aligns with the concept of exploration into unknown
territories as a fearful experience. That is, both concepts relate to
something unknown, fear is a natural human effect or reaction of uncertainty,
and faith, an element of spirituality is a necessary condition to counteract
the emotion of fear. Literatures of Exploration show how the human spirit
combats fear, or in some cases, succumbs to fear. Faith in God and an
afterlife is shown to have a calming affect on those explorers with a
religious spirit even as they knew they were about to die. The most intriguing
aspect of this research however, is realizing the diversity in spirituality
and the sheer affect it can have on the way one looks at destiny and how this
individual perception of fate plays in the choices one makes. Works Cited Brainard, David L. Six Came Back. Ice: Stories of
Survival From Polar Exploration. Ed. Clint Willis. New York: Thunder's
Mouth Press, 1999. 237-256. Byrd, Richard E. Alone. Ice: Stories of Survival From
Polar Exploration. Ed. Clint Willis. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press,
1999. 137-156. Cherry-Garrard, Apsley. The Worst Journey in the
World. Ice: Stories of Survival From Polar Exploration. Ed.
Clint Willis. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, 1999. 59-100. DeLong, George W. The Voyage of The Jeanette. Ice:
Stories of Survival From Polar Exploration. Ed. Clint Willis. New York:
Thunder's Mouth Press, 1999. 157-170. Gooden, Winston E. Confidence Under Pressure: How
Faith Supports Risk Taking. Faith in Leadership. Ed. Robert Banks and
Kimberly Powell. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers. 2000. Lauder, Robert E. Hope: The Christian Response to
Chicken Little. Notre Dame: Fides/Claretian, 1980. Lynch, William F. Images of Faith. Notre Dame:
University of Notre Dame Press, 1973. Scott, Robert Falcon. Scott's Last Expedition: The
Journals. Ice: Stories of Survival From Polar Expedition. Ed. Clint
Willis. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press, 1999. 101-117. Spufford, Frank. I May Be Some Time. Ice:
Stories of Survival From Polar Exploration. Ed. Clint Willis. New York:
Thunder's Mouth Press, 1999. 285-326. Watts, Alan W. The Wisdom of Insecurity. New
York: Vintage Books, 1951.
|