Heather Minette Schutmaat June 18, 2014 1. The Unifying
Elements of American Immigrant Narratives Throughout the course so far, we have identified the
fundamental elements of the American Immigrant Narrative in Early American
Immigrant Literature, East Asian Immigrant Literature, South Asian Immigrant
Literature, and Mexican American Immigrant Literature, as well as examined how
the American Immigrant Narrative differs from the American Minority Narrative.
By identifying these reoccurring elements in the literature of different
American Immigrant groups, I’ve come to understand that while each American
Immigrant group is unique in terms of its culture, history, and country of
origin, the American Immigrant Experience is similar in terms of its patterns,
motives, stages, values, and the idea of “the American Dream,” and therefore
their work may be unified under the banner of the American Immigrant Narrative.
As
noted in Objective 2, the first stage of the American Immigrant Experience is an
immigrant
voluntarily
leaving an “Old World of limits and traditions” behind. The second stage is an
immigrant journeying to “a land of opportunity and change” in pursuit of the
American Dream. In his midterm response from 2010, Charles Olson explains, “By
definition, immigrants leave the familiar old world they have known for a new
world. Why would anyone leave the home they know for the unknown?
Motivations vary, but the American Dream—in one form or another—seems to be a
regular feature of the impulse.” As another student, Carrie C. Scott, explains
in her midterm from 2012, “The American Dream is best defined by the man who
coined the phrase, James Truslow Adams: ‘But there has been also the American
dream, that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller
for every man, with opportunity for each according to his ability or
achievement’ (Adams 404).” Therefore, the motive for leaving the Old World for
the New World (completing the first and second stage) is, in its simplest terms,
opportunity. In “Soap and Water” the
narrator’s journey is a perfect example of these stages as she voluntarily
leaves the Old World and travels to America in search of the opportunity to
pursue her dream of education and self-expression.
Anzia Yezierska writes, “Suddenly, there came
upon me this inspiration. I can go to college! There I shall learn to express
myself, to voice my thoughts.” In many other stories, such as El Patron by Nash
Candelaria, we are given various examples of motives for immigration, all of
which are variations of the American Dream. In El Patron, the daughter Lola
reminds her father of his own decisions as a young adult to immigrate to the
United States, and her father responds, “I did not intend to stay in Mexico and
starve” (IA 227). While both of these motives are voiced differently, they are
essentially the same: both characters immigrated to the United States in pursuit
of a life that is “richer and fuller.” In pursuing the American Dream and climbing the ladder of
success, we see that work ethic is not only an essential dynamic of the
Immigrant Narrative, but a chief value among American Immigrants, which is also
characteristic of the Model Minority, “the label that is often applied to an
ascendant immigrant group that exemplifies ideals implicit in the immigrant
narrative” (Objective 2b). In “Soap and Water,” we certainly see the value of
work ethic: At the time when they rose and took their morning bath,
and put on their fresh-laundered linen that somebody had made ready for them,
when they were being served with their breakfast, I had already toiled for three
hours in a laundry. When college hours were over, they went for a walk in the
fresh air. They had time to rest, and bathe again, and put on fresh clothes for
dinner. But I, after college hours, had only time to bolt a soggy meal, and rush
back to the grind of the laundry till eleven at night. We also see the value of hard work and the resilience of
American Immigrants in other works such as the poem “Restroom” by Chitra
Banerjee Divakaruni in which she says: I know how important the store is. How he saved for it,
one meal a day, rice and water, washed his pants and shirt by hand each night.
Now it's half his. A bad part of town, he wrote, but good money, especially in
liquor. I know I'll be a good worker. I'm used to it, digging in the bajra
fields all morning, then home to cook chapatis for twelve over the open wood
fire, pulling water from the well through the burning afternoon. In stories such as Andrew Carnegie’s we see the ways in
which such work ethic pays off. In his autobiography, Carnegie writes: And that is how in 1850 I got my first real start in
life. From the dark cellar running a steam-engine at two dollars a week,
begrimed with coal dirt, without a trace of the elevating influences of life, I
was lifted into paradise, yes, heaven, as it seemed to me, with newspapers,
pens, pencils, and sunshine about me. There was scarcely a minute in which I
could not learn something or find out how much there was to learn and how little
I knew. I felt that my foot was upon the ladder and that I was bound to climb. .
. . “In
the American Society” by the Chinese American writer Gish Jen, also demonstrates
the rewards of work ethic. In the first line of “In the American Society” Gish
Jen writes, “When my father took over the pancake house, it was to send my
little sister Mona and me to college” and then says that they “got rich right
away” (IA 159). This also exemplifies the Model Minority, as “‘ideal immigrants’
take advantage of economic and educational opportunities.” In this story, we are
also given a good example of assimilation, the “process by which distinct ethnic
groups become more like other Americans, especially in terms set by the USA's
dominant culture.” Painting a portrait of the mother in “The American Society”
and illustrating how she has assimilated to the dominant culture, Gish Jen
writes, “She didn’t work at the supermarket anymore; but she had made it to the
rank of manager before she left, and this had given her not only new words and
phrases, but new ideas about herself, and about America, and about what was what
in general… she herself was now interested in espadrilles, and wallpaper, and
most recently, the town country club” (IA 159). However, we also see that the
father in this story practices “selective assimilation” which is also
characteristic of the Model Minority: “’Your father doesn’t believe in joining
the American society’ said my mother. ‘He wants to have his own society.’ (AI
159).
While many of the stories we’ve read so far
have exhibited the success of American Immigrants, many of these works also
narrate stage three of the American Immigrant experience, which includes the
exploitation and discrimination of American Immigrants by the dominant culture,
as discussed in Objectives 1 and 4. In “Soap and Water,” Yezierska begins, “What
I so greatly feared, happened! Miss Whiteside, the dean of our college, withheld
my diploma. When I came to her office, and asked her why she did not pass me,
she said that she could not recommend me as a teacher because of my personal
appearance.” Here, the dominant culture is discriminating against an immigrant,
withholding the diploma she has work so hard for, based exclusively on her
physical appearance. In the short story “In the Land of the Free” by the Chinese
American author Sui Sin Far, a child is taken from his parents by an American
customs officer because of a paper order, which demonstrates the dominant
culture’s power over American Immigrants. The child’s parents are also exploited
by the dominant culture when their American lawyer takes advantage of them. Such
discrimination and exploitation also resembles and overlaps with the American
Minority Experience.
2.
The
Similarities and Differences of the American Minority Narrative and the American
Immigrant Narrative One of the most important concepts to grasp in order to
understand the significant difference between the American Minority Experience
and the American Immigrant Experience is “voluntary participation vs.
involuntary participation.” As Carlos Marquina points out in his midterm
response in the 2012, “The difference between the immigrant narrative and the
minority narrative is mainly a matter of choice. Immigrants choose to come to
America and assimilate into the established culture in the hopes of improving
their economic and/or educational status. ” As I’ve discussed in the first
essay, in leaving behind the Old World and journeying to the New World (stages
one and two of the Immigrant Experience), Immigrants are participating
voluntarily. However, the American Minority Experience involves involuntary
participation. Unlike American Immigrants, “African Americans were
brought to America forcefully and involuntarily; instead of finding opportunity,
they found slavery and, later, segregation and continuing discrimination.” The
Slave Narratives of Olaudah Equiano and Frederick Douglass powerfully
demonstrate this involuntary participation. In the Narrative of Olaudah Equiano, he
describes the terrifying experience of being kidnapped and forced into slavery: Two men and a woman got over our walls and in a moment
seized us both, and, without giving us time to cry out, or make resistance, they
stopped our mouths, and ran off with us into the nearest wood. Here they tied
our hands, and continued to carry us as far as they could, till night came on,
when we reached a small house where the robbers halted for refreshment, and
spent the night. Both
Equiano and Douglass illustrate slavery as being relegated to subhuman status
without a choice, voice, or rights, drawing a thick line between the involuntary
participation of American Minorities and the choice American Immigrants make on
their own accord to pursue their dreams of opportunity in America. Later African
American Minority literature, such as “The Lesson” by Toni Cade Bambara
demonstrates the segregation and continuing discrimination of African Americans
even after slavery had ended.
Similar to the involuntary participation of the
African American Experience, “Native Americans were already here for thousands
of years before modern immigration began, which causes catastrophic losses;
instead of living the American Dream, they suffer the American Nightmare.”
Having had their land stolen from them and having suffered catastrophic losses,
the Native American Immigrant Narrative is also one of involuntary contact,
exploitation, and oppression. In the short story “American Horse” Louis Erdrich
metaphorically and poignantly illustrates the power the dominant culture exerts
over Native American Minorities when Buddy dreams of “a large thing made of
metal with many barbed hooks, points, and drag chains on it, something like a
giant potato peeler that rolled out of the sky, scraping clouds down with it and
jabbing or crushing everything that lay in its path on the ground” (IA 210).
Later in the story, Buddy is taken from his mother by the state. Another
powerful representation of the involuntary participation of Native Americans is
Chrystos’s poem “I Have Not Sign a Treaty with the United States Government.”
Chrystos says, “Everything the United States does to everybody is bad / No this
US is not a good idea We declare you terminated / You’ve had your fun now go
home we’re tired.”
Although the American Minority Experience
differs greatly from the American Immigrant Experience in terms of
participation, the narratives also overlap in some ways. While American
Minorities are in search of the Dream (which is different from the American
Dream as it “entails setbacks, the need to rise again, and a quest for group
dignity”) and American Immigrants are in search of the American Dream, both
groups execute hard work in order to climb the ladder of success. Similar to
Max’s story in the Immigrant Narrative “Bread Givers” in which he begins his
first day of work in America by shoveling snow and later in the narrative owns a
chain of stores, Frederick Douglass also demonstrates work ethic and resilience.
Douglass writes, “I
found employment,
the third day after my arrival, in stowing a sloop with a load of oil. It was
new, dirty,
and hard work for me; but I went at it with a glad heart and a willing hand.”
Therefore, like Max, Douglass finds labor upon his arrival and begins his new
journey with hard work and ambition.
Another similarity of the American Immigrant
Experience and the American Minority Experience is the discrimination and
exploitation both groups endure. As I discussed in the first essay, in “Soap and
Water” the dominant culture is
discriminating against the female narrator when Mrs. White withholds the
narrator’s diploma based exclusively on her physical appearance. We see this
same kind of discrimination in Frederick Douglass’s narrative when he says,
“When
I got through with that job, I went
in pursuit of
a job of calking; but such was the strength of prejudice against color, among
the white calkers, that they refused to work with me, and of course I could get
no employment.” Although both groups undergo discrimination based on their
appearance, by the end of Anzia Yezierska’s story, the narrator is able to
forget her past and find America: “My past was the forgotten night. Sunrise was
all around me. I went out from Miss Van Ness’s office, singing a song of new
life: ‘America! I found America.’”
However, for American Minorities the
assimilation process is more difficult than it is for American Immigrants.
“Through assimilation, immigrant cultures become ‘unmarked’: ethnic markers
(distinct language, clothes, hair, makeup, perfumes) disappear.” However,
“minority cultures may remain ‘marked’ by physical differences (skin color, body
styles, facial characteristics) and cultural styles” making it more difficult
for American Minorotoes to assimilate. These distinct physical markers include,
“the color code” which often perpetuates the negative self-image of American
Minorities. In the poem “Blonde White Women” Patricia Smith shows the negative
effects of the color code: “I practiced kissing, because to blonde and white /
meant to be kissed, and my fat lips slimmed / around words like ‘delightful’ and
‘darling.’” However, by the end of the poem, Smith no longer desires to
assimilate to the dominant culture’s standard of beauty, but instead finds
beauty in her skin color.
Therefore, while American Minority Narratives
and American Immigrant Narratives often resemble each other in regard to
discrimination and exploitation, as well as work ethic, they differ in terms of
participation and in the process of assimilation. In short, while their
narratives may overlap in their experiences as “the other,” “The minority
narrative (African Americans, Native Americans) is not an immigrant story of
voluntary participation and assimilation but of involuntary contact and
exploitation and resisting assimilation to the dominant culture.”
|