Carlos Marquina American Minorities: What Became of Our Dream?
Chrystos’s poem, “I Have Not Signed a Treaty with
the United States Government,” exposes the limitations of the American dream
felt by Native Americans. She states, “No one wants to go there. This US is
theory
illusion/ terrible ceremony… No this US is not a good idea
We declare you terminated/ You’ve had your fun now
go home we’re tired.” The American dream that has attracted immigrants from all
over the world over the past four hundred years is a failed experiment to what
was an already established dominant culture for the Native Americans. America,
based on the ideals of the basic rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness, failed to include two major cultures into its experiment: the Native
Americans and the African slaves that were brought to American shores by force.
The difference between the immigrant narrative and
the minority narrative is mainly the matter of choice. Immigrants choose to come
to America and assimilate into the established dominant culture in the hopes of
improving their economic and/or educational status. Native Americans, however,
were already present when the first settlers arrived. The Puritan settlers,
following in the tradition of the Exodus Jews, refused to mix with the natives.
The Puritans believed that this “new” land was their Promised Land, where they
could freely exercise their religious and social traditions. The theme of the
dominant American culture “rolling over” the native culture is seen throughout
the narrative selections for the course. In the story
American Horse, by Louise Erdrich,
Buddy dreams of “a large thing made of metal with many barbed hooks, points, and
drag chains on it, something like a giant potato peeler that rolled out of the
sky, scraping clouds down with it and jabbing or crushing everything that lay in
its path on the ground.” Later in the story, the white social worker and
policemen that take him from his home are described as “the sharp things all
around him.” In Leslie Marmon Silko’s story,
The Man to Send Rain Clouds, the
priest is annoyed that he wasn’t informed of Teofilo’s death. When Leon tells
the priest that Last Rites weren’t necessary, the priest replies, “For a
Christian burial it was necessary.” There is no choice in the matter for the
natives. Either they conform to the dominant culture brought by the Europeans,
or they get rolled over and pounded into the ground.
Although the immigrant chooses on his or her own
accord to come to America and assimilate, there is still a period of resistance.
During this period, the immigrant must decide whether she will conform to the
laws of America or be expelled from it. In Far’s
In the Land of the Free, Hom Hing
explains to his wife that they must follow the law as immigration officers take
away their son. America is not a system of laws, not people. Paper, rather than
men, becomes the operating factor of American ideals. Both children in Far’s
story and Erdrich’s are taken from their parents and home because of a paper
order. The literary tradition of the dominant culture overshadows the
face-to-face traditions of the Old World. This reliance on paper authority
rather than human authority is the main criticism of Chrystos’s poem.
The African-American minority has also suffered
through the reliance of paper in the dominant culture. According to the
Constitution of the United States, African slaves were to be considered
three-fifths of a person and not eligible for citizenship. Native Americans were
not eligible for citizenship either. The founding of the nation’s laws followed
a color code where light (good, rational) and dark (evil, irrational) values
were transferred to a person’s skin color. For the minority, this color code
makes it impossible to ever fully assimilate to the dominant culture. Work
ethic, religion, customs, and language can be changed but skin color can never
be changed. From the point of view of the minority if the dominant culture
associates whiteness with goodness, then blackness will always be badness. And
blackness cannot be erased from someone’s skin. The narrator in Patricia Smith
‘s poem “practiced kissing, because to be blonde and white/ meant to be
kissed…When I was white, my name was Donna/ My teeth were perfect.” Her poem,
“Blonde White Women,” expresses her childhood desire to be a white girl. She
desired for her white teacher to be her mother. To be white was to be first, to
be something. Yet when the teacher rejects her because she is black, the
narrator realizes that her beauty lies in her blackness. Even if this blackness
removes her from the dominant culture.
The immigrants, especially non-Europeans, also
suffer from the discrimination that the color code presents. In
Silver Pavements, Golden Roofs,
Jayanti and her aunt are assaulted by some neighborhood white boys and are
called “nigger.” Although they are Indian and part of a model minority that has
achieved a higher level of success than other immigrant groups, the color code
still blocks their access to complete assimilation into the dominant culture.
Despite the difficulty of breaking through the color code, the immigrant still
pursues access into the dominant culture. Color is just another barrier like
language. The minority, on the other hand, refuses to buy into the American
dream and do not assimilate.
In The Lesson,
Miss Moore takes the children on a field trip to a toy store where all the toys
are way beyond their economic reach. Instead of being impressed and asking how
they can gain access to this wealth, the children instead sense that something
is wrong. They know that this is out of their reach. It won’t matter how hard
they try or how much they fall into place. The American dream is not within
their reach. Sugar asks, “Equal chance to pursue happiness means an equal crack
at the dough, don’t it?” The lesson disturbs the narrator and she seems to imply
that she will play a different game. Not the game in which the dominant culture
will always win, but a game in which she
won’t be able to be beat.
|