Amy Sidle Essay 1
Immigrant Narratives: A Powerful Tale of New Beginnings
Narratives are powerful; personal anecdotes are
influential, sentimental, and informative, much like reading reality instead of
watching reality television. In his book
The Triumph of Narrative: Storytelling in the Age of Mass Culture, Robert
Fulford states that “narrative…has
the power to mimic the unfolding of reality. Narrative is selective, and may be
untrue, but it can produce the feeling of events occurring in time; it seems to
be rooted in reality.” Immigrant narratives are vulnerable glimpses into the
lives of those freshly new to America, showing their heartache and confusion,
their excitement and delight for their immigrant experiences. Whether
autobiographical or not, a narrative is one of raw emotion, allowing the
audience to truly grasp the severity of the immigrant tale.
In the immigrant narrative, some of the most vulnerable moments we are not privy
to, for they have already passed, those reasons or events that took place back
home that sparked the final decision to leave. In “The English Lesson”, Stephan
Paczkowski explains to his English language class that “a political situation in
Poland” forced “all Jewish people” by request of the government “to leave
Poland” (27). Both he and his wife were professors at the University of Warsaw,
but despite their being educated professionals, they were forced from their
home, their country because of their belief system – possibly the most archaic
cause for immigration. While his reason for leaving Poland alone is
heartbreaking, his story seems exceptionally cruel when he states he now works
“in large hospital as position of porter in maintenance department” (27). His
education from Poland has been voided; he is compelled to start anew, from
scratch, in America. The stereotypical American Dream describes the
want to start anew, not usually
because of force or need (obj. 1).
If referencing Obj. 2c’s stages of immigrant narrative, Stephan Paczkowski would
certainly fall in Stage 3, where he has passed the shock and resistance of the
new world and is feeling the exploitation and discrimination of his immigrant
status (i.e. having a once educated professor scrub toilets). As the immigrant
narrative evolves naturally (or often with some resistance) one would begin to
assimilate to America and its culture. In “Thank God for the Jews”, Fatima has
become a bit lax in her meat preparation practices. Instead of purchasing
traditional halal meat from the market, she merely says “the kalmia while
washing the meat” and feels the “little ritual” make her “pious and wise beyond
her years” (231). Fatima’s assimilation to American customs has caused this
side-step in her tradition and even mentions that she feels she does not read
the Quran enough anymore. Her solid Stage 4 immigrant narrative is beginning to
slink into Stage 5, a partial rediscovery of ethnic identity.
As immigrants often search for overlapping customs or comforts from their old
world into their new world, so do Americans reflect on the foundations that made
us immigrants too. The Declaration of Independence recites that “all men are
created equal” and have “certain unalienable rights”, which (most famously)
include “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness”. The Founding Fathers
recognized nearly three hundred years ago the tribulations that would bring
those to this great country and wanted to welcome those individuals to a country
that would not only meet their needs but surpass their every desire. And thus
began the sentiment behind the American Dream (quite arguably Stage 0 of the
Immigrant Narrative).
It is this notion of the American Dream that breaks families apart, hoping to
build a better life in America before the entire family can benefit from the
hard-work. (Obj. 2g) In
Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni’s
prose poem “Restroom,” for the past eight years the woman and her husband have
been separated as he establishes a business in America; now, she must join her
husband in America though it means leaving their young daughter behind with
relatives. This sacrifice shows the lengths that families will go for the mere
minute possibility of achieving their “piece of the pie”.
Immigrant narratives are over-flowing with
opportunity and willingness. Their eagerness to achieve and mutual respect for
their homeland and new-land provide them with endless possibilities to grasp
whatever it is that they seek. Though their initial reasons for entering the
country might differ, they all hope to achieve the same outcome – success, no
matter how one might define it.
Essay 2
Minority vs. Immigrant Narratives: Differing Approaches to Similar
Situations
Hundreds of people enter this country willingly
every day, fully aware they will face trials and tribulations in order to create
the life they want; however, there are people that did not ask to come here, who
were keen to stay in their home country but forced to come to America, work and
given nothing in compensation. Their story differs from the standard immigrant
narrative.
The minority narrative does not begin with a spark
of want or necessity for immigration. Their story does not begin with foreseen
good-byes or scheduled voyages but usually with unnecessary sacrifice and being
torn from their homeland. In Olaudah Equiano’s slave narrative, he recalls his
capture: “I
and my dear sister were left to mind the house, two men and a woman got over our
walls and in a moment seized us both, and, without giving us time to cry out, or
make resistance, they stopped our mouths, and ran off with us…” His immigration
was not wanted; he did not have the hope of a better life at the other end, but
one of treachery and abuse. (Obj. 3a)
Due to their harsh treatments (both past and some present) many minority
cultures resist assimilating in to the dominant culture. They tend to group
themselves together forming their own cities within cities (like Harlem, for
instance, sometimes seen with immigrant narratives like Chinatown or Little
Italy). However, unlike immigrant narratives, minorities will live in those hubs
all their lives or will return to them if leaving is necessary. In “The Lesson”,
Miss Moore returned to her old neighborhood after being absent for some time.
Though it was obvious that Miss Moore wasn’t quite the same status as most of
the neighborhood clientele (wearing fancy clothes and taking the kids to FAO
Schwartz), her college degree made her feel obligated to return to the
neighborhood to take over the children’s education (145-147). Minority
narratives often keep groups close-knit or reliant up one another; however,
nuclear family ties aren’t necessarily seen as boundaries for exclusion. Groups
can be formed by location (neighborhood), similar situations (slaves or
us-vs.-them mentality) or merely a broad family tree.
While Miss Moore left her neighborhood to pursue a college degree, many
minorities do not realize that there is more beyond their understood boundaries.
Though many immigrant narratives often chase the American Dream (no matter the
tangibility), minority narratives often believe such opportunities are illusive
to them or if the opportunities are there, they don’t know how to seize them.
Again, Miss Moore seized an opportunity (though looked upon as rare in a
minority narrative) to earn a college degree, but instead of going on and doing
bigger and better things with that degree, she chose to return to her old
neighborhood to share the wealth of knowledge she learned, knowing that many of
the residents would never get beyond the neighborhood. (Obj. 3b & 3c) A real
life example is LeBron James. He grew up in a rough part of Akron, Ohio and
instead of taking his basketball millions to a luxury neighborhood nearer to
Cleveland, he chose to build a mansion in his old neighborhood despite the many
whispers that it was a bad idea. He has established a couple community reach-out
programs in the neighborhood. This narrative is all too familiar with minorities
– they want to share their wealth and knowledge to benefit the entire community;
however, immigrant narratives usually gain individual wealth (or for their
immediate family) only.
Even within minority groups – immigrants included – there is a differing between
stories, a feeling of sorts that segregates minorities even further from
immigrants. In “Silver Pavements, Golden Roofs” when Jayanti is called the
N-word by the local boys, she says, “the word arcs through the empty street like
a rock, an impossible word which belongs to another place and time” (80).
Jayanti, though only newly arrived in America, knows that word is not associated
with her being Indian but by the dark color of her skin and quickly wishes to
correct the boys that she is not like the people that word describes. (Obj. 3f)
Furthermore, immigrant narratives wish to assimilate to the dominant culture,
often citing awkward or unpleasant incidents when their native customs differed
from those around them. Upon seeing her Aunt and Uncle at the airport, Jayanti
touches “their feet like a good Indian girl should, though [she is] somewhat
embarrassed…[as] everyone in the airport is watching us,” and her Aunt responds
by kissing Jayanti “on both cheeks, but a little hesitantly” for “she hasn’t
done something like this in a long time” (72). Though immigrants tend to keep
some tradition (but over generations it seems to get lost), they truly feel a
need to assimilate to American customs, hoping to fit in or merely not be
singled out as different. However, though minority narratives would recognize
the dissimilarity between their customs and the dominant culture’s, they would
not immediate assume assimilation would be the answer; in fact, they might even
repel or resist assimilation. (Obj 3c)
I don’t believe that either narrative is exclusive or is ever final, for they
are constantly changing and creating new appendixes to ancient stories as time
and society evolves. It is with hope that no matter one’s narrative he will feel
comfortable and content in whatever place he decides to call home.
|