2g. Develop a question or topic of your own that refers to course texts and varies objectives. Acknowledge course objective(s) relating to your subject.
Daryl Edwards
American Attitudes Toward Immigration: Some Things Never Change
In order to
understand the nature of the debate, one must understand the two forces which
are central to the process, “assimilation” into the “dominant culture.”
Assimilation is the process by which immigrants become more like Americans. It
involves learning the language, intermarriage, shared institutions and beliefs
in concepts of opportunity or self development. As the immigrant is assimilated
he loses more of the ethnic or cultural differences that separate him from the
dominant culture. By the dominant culture we generally mean mainstream white
These issues are
pertinent to the discussion because they serve as examples of how out-groups
seek entrance into the mainstream dominant culture. The problem arises when the
dominant culture is not accepting of immigrant entrance into the mainstream. It
has been noted that it is in fact the immigrant groups who are hesitant to
enter. In her 2008 essay, Division to Diversity, Tanya Stanley proposed that
“The dominant culture is the entity immigrants assimilate to and minorities
resist.” I do not subscribe to this position. History is rife with examples of
out-groups marching, protesting, pleading, and suing in court to access the
benefits and privileges of the dominant culture. Indeed, one of the symbols
noted in Dr. White’s terms and symbols of dominant culture is the penchant for
living behind fences and in gated communities. This strikes me as emblematic of
someone preferring to deny access to the masses rather than welcoming them with
open arms.
The issue of
immigration as I said is contentious today. The television and print media are
constantly giving us stories on how divisive the nation has grown on the issue.
One would assume given the heated rhetoric that this is a new manifestation. In
fact, the subject has been an issue of contention periodically throughout our
nation’s history. In today’s environment of economic uncertainty many perceive
the arrival of fresh immigrants as unviable and perceive it in zero-sum terms,
that is to say, anything the immigrant receives must come at the native –born’s
expense. Such a perception creates hostility and resentment.
In times such as
these notions of “melting pots” and “golden doors’’’ are shelved in preference
of xenophobia and rhetoric. The uncle in Chitra Divakaruni’s, Silver Pavements,
Golden Roofs, is accurate when he laments that, “The Americans hate us. They’re
always putting us down because we’re dark-skinned foreigners,…Blaming us for the
damn economy, for taking away their jobs.” Of course not all Americans take this
position, but an alarming number do. I find it beyond ironic that the
descendants of immigrants could be so passionately anti-immigrant.
I believe that
this type of rational observation is facilitated through the type of study and
research that we have done in this class. Understanding multicultural literature
provides us with a look deeper into the issue and permits us to see the history
surrounding it. Public outcry over the perceived invasion of dark-skinned
(different-looking) immigrants is not a recent manifestation. The same issues
were raised a hundred years ago with immigrants from eastern Europe. Dominant
culture is slow to accept that which is different to begin with; doing so in a
period of financial uncertainty only exacerbates the problem.
Perhaps it would
serve us as Americans to keep in mind that when the Pilgrims disembarked at
Works Cited
The Declaration of
Diaz, Junot. How to Date a Browngirl. Imagining
Promised Land.
Persea Books.
Divakaruni, Chitra. Silver Pavements, Golden Roofs. Imagining
From the
Promised Land. Persea Books.
Smith, Patricia. Blonde White Women. Imagining
Promised Land.
Persea Books.
Wikipedia.
|