Sample
Final Exam
submissions 2015

(2015 final exam assignment)

Essay 2 Sample

LITR 5831 World Literature


Colonial-Postcolonial

 

Assignment: Referring to Objectives 1 & 2, compose a dialogue between at least four texts (at least 3 since midterm) on a topic, theme, issue, or objective of your choice (Objectives in addition to 1 & 2 may be included.)

Janice Smith

8 December 2015

Lucy, Jasmine, Hukum, and George: Searching for Unity

Several dynamic characters presented themselves in the reading for this course. Suffice to say that the variety of men and women characterized within the novels offered a decent range of cultural and historical perspectives. Within this essay I would like to look at the cultural perspectives from men like Hukum in Train to Pakistan and George Orwell in Shooting an Elephant and compare them to the cultural perspectives of women in Jamaica Kincaid’s Lucy and Bharati Mukherjee’s Jasmine. While the gender differences are apparent, I would like to try and look beyond the surface of males as dominant and females as the “others” and open up a dialogue between all four characters to show how both Colonial and Post-Colonial perspectives wrestle with the concept of oppression in the novel and the short story.

For Hukum, being a Magistrate means he must maintain law and order. Placed in this powerful position, he is forced to deal with the discord between the Muslims and the Sikhs. He wrestles with this moral dilemma in the novel and often drinks to help cope with the situation. On one hand he is seen as the corrupt official of a town being subjected to the ravages of civil war. While I also see him as a man left to determine the lesser of two evils for the outcomes of the village. For me both perspectives create the tension that makes him worthy of discussion.  His unsettled nature is meant to reflect what Khushwant Singh felt was part of the partitioning experience. At some point the feeling of right and wrong are so misplaced that they seem almost relative. What is right and what is wrong?  Hukum is often perceived as non-responsive at stopping vile acts, and this makes him look somewhat apathetic. Many of his actions are worthy of comparison to the policeman in George Orwell’s Shooting an Elephant.

 Like Hukum, Orwell’s police officer struggles with the responsibilities of being a law enforcer. In this narrative a police officer comes face to face with his own displacement when a rutting elephant tears through a village. Conflicted by the idea that he must shoot the elephant, but doesn’t want to. In the end the officer shoots the elephant to avoid looking “like a fool.”  Both Hukum and Orwell struggle with the moral dilemma that confront them. Orwell acts in an attempt to solve the problem whereas Hukum pours himself a drink, turns off the light, and cries to himself rather than help stop the train plot. For Orwell, his behavior leads him to the realization that he is not in control, but rather the will of the people are governing his actions. This only serves to deepen his anti-imperialist sentiment. When viewed in this way the conqueror and the conquered are both being destroyed. This ideal seems to create a type of destructive relativity that on some level equates to the moral relativity that Singh speaks of in Train.

Being misplaced and out of sorts is a way of life for the character Lucy in Jamaica Kincaid’s novel. This young West Indian girl is generally thought to be an extension of Kincaid’s essay titled, A Small Place. There is rarely a time in the novel where the character is comfortable in her skin. Like Hukum and Orwell, she struggle with the colonialist’s ideal of moral right and wrong. This is best represented through the relationship she has with her overbearing mother. Her psychological struggle is very similar to Orwell’s and Hukum’s in that the preconceived colonialist notions that define behavior tap at her conscience. It never seems to leave the peripheral for all four characters in this essay. It is foreboding and ominous. Yet Lucy is unlike Orwell and Hukum because the psychological “pressure is part of what eventually brings about the change that will lead her to break out of the slave role and establish herself as a free woman”( Smith 2015). Meanwhile, Hukum and Orwell continue to struggle; their consciousness is in conflict with the colonialist mindset. It seems that status is of no help to the male characters because they cannot free themselves to act against the forces that oppress them. When taking this into account, all four characters face a moral struggle forced upon them by their culture.  

 In her 2013 research post Kristine Vermillion argues “the gender binary is more ancient and widespread than the reaches of colonialism, and that oppression has yet to come to pass. Yet the novel is a place where voices of women are being heard through the moving stories of individual women.” Jasmine is one such story. Like Lucy and Shooting an Elephant, Jasmine is a narrative. All of these books give the reader close-up views of what is going on in the minds of colonialist subjects. Told in this way, you see Jasmine as a woman who knows what she wants to become. She struggles like Lucy, Hukum and George with the implications of colonialist mentality. From early on, she, like Lucy, seeks to push the boundaries of her traditional life, and through very violent means, frees herself from her past. Jasmine, Hukum, Lucy, and George are all subjected to a death in some way as part of coming to conclusions about the lives they lead. George’s killing of the elephant and Jasmine’s killing of her rapists bring both characters to a new level of consciousness, and both are equally empowered by the experience. Hukum and Lucy are faced by the death of family members. Hukum remembers his daughter’s violent death and faces it with apathy and withdrawal. It serves to remind the reader how war and corruption consume everything so that there is no one and nothing left to carry on.  While the news of Lucy’s father gives her the strength she needs to spurn the mother for good and become the modern women that she always wanted to be. The death of Lucy’s father is a liberation from her mother. 

By bringing these four characters into dialogue I was able to show how the oppressive nature of colonial and post-colonial society effects both men and women. Rather than use the gender card as a means of polarizing the sexes, I attempted to show that struggles within a cultural framework can present equal challenges for both sexes. What was most interesting to me was how all four characters sought to control the environment they were subjected to. Each individual contemplates the outcomes and subscribes to some form of action as a means of coping with the culture.