Susanne Allen
Dec. 7, 2011
Gender Analysis
in Colonial and Postcolonial Novels
It is possible to bring into dialogue the novels of Mukherjee, Singh, Achebe,
and Conrad and openly discuss gender in the colonial and postcolonial treatment
of women in the novels. It is also easy to use the novels in nonfictional
discourse to understand the commonality of violence against women. In order to
gain insight into the real and prevalent treatment of women, literary scholars
must address the violence and not read violence for entertainment purposes as an
essential and normal part of literature. Social change is possible if the
subject is addressed and not used as reading fodder.
Historicism
is an approach to
literature that emphasizes the interaction between the historic context of the
work and a modern reader’s understanding and interpretation of the work.
I will use historicism to explain the discourse between literary parables and
the unchanging truth of human nature. There are many scholars who are addressing
the treatment of women in a very real way through scholarly discourse.
Mitra Channa, Subhadra in her
study of Globalization and Modernity In
India: A Gendered Critique, boldly
states,
Colonial
rule projected western science as the ultimate source of knowledge and western
values as supreme. Stereotypes of oppressed non-western women had their
counterpart in the male, rational western culture, coming to their rescue, both
metaphorically and literally. Unfortunately, these stereotypes became so
entrenched in the psyche of post-colonial nation builders that they and even
third-world feminist activists confuse development with "westernization." The
fallacy of such an assumption becomes clear when one takes a glance at the
realities of everyday life where crimes against women and poverty, and
marginalization of the masses is exploding in the most urban metropolises with
the highest exposure to modernization and
globalization. Urban
India is replete with rising
incidences of crimes against women. Conservative supporters of westernization
would attribute such malaise to "tradition." But rational thought points to
globalization, with its emphasis
on material values, consumerism and "trashing" of traditional knowledge.
Globalization has eroded the
traditional resource base, as well as, the knowledge and power associated with
it. (Abstract).
How can this bold statement be further examined using our four novels without
losing sight of the postcolonial strife suffered by the people as a whole? Are
women suffering more in the postcolonial literature and is that a symptom of
colonialism or customs?
Singh’s novel, Train to Pakistan, has
at least ten references to sexual violence against women.
He begins his novel with a threat to “rape mothers and sisters” (10). The
violence is perpetuated over and over again by Hokum Chand when he, both, holds
the young girl against her will, and then rapes her for his own pleasure with
her grandmother permission. The theme of giving young girls away to older men is
a common one shared among our readings. However, In Mukherjee’s
Jasmine, she is not raped, but given
to an old landowner at the age of thirteen (Mukaerjee 48). She marries him
against her will, but it all seems normal enough because it is the custom. The
interesting thing about Jasmine is that she is outspoken and is allowed to go to
school. Her husband is not keen on
having her pregnant at a young age. The novel is progressive and empowers the
character of Jasmine to invent and reinvent herself over and over again in the
book. While she does not have a
particularly fruitful live she is rich in her self-preservation techniques. The
novel, possibly because it is written by a woman, gives the heroine a stronger
constitution as a transnational migrant.
Jasmine illustrates the women in the next phase of postcolonial women in
literature. Postcolonial gender studies are particularly interesting because the
resonating voice of postcolonialism is equality and independence, and this must
translate to women as well.
In Achebe’s novel Things Fall Apart,
much of the traditional Igbo life presented in this novel revolves around
structured gender roles. Essentially all of Igbo life is gendered, from the
crops that men and women grow, to characterization of crimes. In Igbo culture,
women are the weaker sex, but are also endowed with qualities that make them
worthy of worship, like the ability to bear children. The dominant role for
women is: first, to make a pure bride for an honorable man, second, to be a
submissive wife, and third, to bear many children. The ideal man provides for
his family materially and has prowess on the battlefield (Stanford Review).
Okonkwo is extremely concerned with being hyper-masculine and devalues
everything feminine, leaving him rather unbalanced. It is true that a balance
must be found, but Okonkwo throws his family off balance with his violence
towards his wife in the form of a beating for supposedly killing a banana tree
(Achebe 38). The balance is again disrupted as the Umuofia elders decide that
the virgin girl should be given to the man whose wife was just murdered. The
boy’s fate goes undecided, so Okonkwo takes him home in the meantime (Achebe
27). There are also subtle references to the weakness of women, for instance,
when Okonkwo kills Ikemefuna he thinks of himself a “women”
(Achebe
63).
And again, he is concerned that his son likes women’s work and stories (Achebe
33). The novel serves as an accurate depiction of the treatment of women and
womanly things in colonial and postcolonial Africa.
The answer to avoiding the literary violence against women comes in the form of
leaving them out or marginalizing their need in a manly world. Novels can only
speak to the times in which they are written and Conrad’s
Heart of Darkness is no different.
Conrad’s, Heart of Darkness, barely
mentions women, but even the few incidences that women do appear Marlow has a
common thread that lends to his sexist attitude towards them.
They play only minor roles in the novel
and often live vicariously through their male counterparts. They are rarely
given voices of their own and are more often seen than heard. The few exceptions
– Marlow’s aunt and the Intended – often confirm Marlow’s assumption that women
are naďve and idealistic. That they blind themselves to truths become Marlow’s
sole belief, yet he seeks to keep them in their beautiful and idealized world.
This novel is a perfect example of how literary works can ignore or expose
violence against women. I contend that it is better to expose it and begin a
dialogue among scholars who can begin to read the literature with fresh eyes and
work towards change in postcolonial nations.
As the politics change, so must the ingrained ill treatment of women.
(Class discussion 12/5)
I
am required to reference a student lead discussion – I want to refer to my own
presentation. This is not a criticism,
but a realization on my part. I was
standing in front of the class, well prepared, and ready to lead the discussion
on the Train to Pakistan. I watched
the class perk up and get ready to eagerly discuss their literary impressions of
the book. When I asked them to turn
to page one, while I read to them, then to page 10 and then page 29 etcetera, I
could see their eyes go dead. Their verbal arsenal of imagery, prose, and
interpretations flew out the door. The images of rape, molestation, and the
murder of women were not literary allegories that could be discussed away or
argued. I lost the class with my subject matter, and I run the risk of losing
the instructor with this paper. However, I am insistent that literary minds must
use the subject matter in novels to affect change in the way that violence is
accepted as a normal part of literature without also using it as a tool for
discussion and change. I sit here at my desk with the novels piled one on top of the other. They look like tapestry with the pages open and the covers exposed right-side up and right-side down. While the novels span decades and nations, they speak to each other in an intimate and undeniable way. I hear them as they mesh together on my desk, “listen to me, protect me, and treat me like an equal.” Works Cited Mitra Channa, Subhadra. "Globalization and Modernity in India:
A Gendered Critique." Urban Anthropology & Studies Of Cultural Systems &
World Economic Development 33.1 (2004): 37-71. Academic Search Complete.
Web. 15 Nov. 2011.
|