| 
   
 |  | 
 LITR 5734: Colonial & 
Postcolonial Literature 2008
  
 Student Research Post 1 
Cory Owen 
The Role of the Hijab 
 
    When I first saw this class listed as an option for the Spring semester, I 
was excited.  After having studied post-colonial literature a few semesters 
before, I was interested in expanding my knowledge of the actual colonial period 
that had changed so much of the world.  In my final semester of undergraduate, I 
took a course entitled "Women in Arabic Literature."  This course introduced me 
to much more knowledge of the Arabic world (though it was mostly focused on 
Algeria since that's where my professor's husband was from), and it piqued my 
interest immediately.  Since my first job after college was working in an ESL 
program on the A&M campus, I had the opportunity to work with many Muslim 
students who were more than happy to teach me more about their faith and 
culture--this was especially interesting to me since I was a religious studies 
minor in college.  Since then, my studies have led me towards books that are 
controversial and yet informative about viewpoints from both ends of the 
spectrum regarding the perception of Muslims throughout the world.  
Specifically, I was intrigued by the veiling, or wearing of hijabs, of 
many Muslim women.  The question that always haunted me was whether or not women 
were being forced to wear these on the grounds of control and manipulation or it 
was due to individual choices of women to give a message to the general public.  
Years later, I'm still stuck at this question with no clearer results.  What 
I've realized is that there is no clear and simple answer and it completely 
depends on the woman, the situation, and the time period. 
 
It seems easy in the Western world to just generalize all veiled women as people 
who are subjected to this wardrobe by their oppressors--the men.  And many 
accounts tell us such things.  From the outside looking in, it is hard to see 
anything else.  Many people from the "outside" were intrigued by these seemingly 
foreign and exotic women.  One group in particular, the photographers, were 
intrigued by these veiled women and were frustrated by their attempts to capture 
these women.  "Turned back upon himself, upon his own impotence in the 
situation, the photographer undergoes an initial experience of disappointment 
and rejection.  Draped in the veil that cloaks her to her ankles, that 
Algerian woman discourages the scopic voyeurism of the photographer" (Alloula 
7).  Furthermore, this distress towards women who are veiled does not end with 
just Westerners.  "Indeed, even certain Muslim feminists decry the wearing of 
the veil on the basis that men use it as a tool to oppress women" (Droogsma 
296).   For many people, the veil is a sign of not only oppression, but a fight 
against modernity and the influence of the West.  And yet, it seems as though 
many people regard veiling as a choice forced upon the women whereas, it is 
becoming more and more evident that this is not the case for all women.  When 
France declared that outward evidences of religious beliefs (including hijabs) 
would be banned, there was a loud outcry from the Muslim community (Economist 
23).  What seemed to surprised the Western society was that the women wanted 
to be veiled and fought for this right. 
 
For many women, being veiled allows a certain amount of freedom.  During a tour 
of Afghanistan, Harriet Logan began to see a surprising side of the effects of 
"freedom".  There was an assumption that women were forced by men to wear these
hijabs, and in a certain sense they were.  "After a very short time being 
there, I found it easy to understand why they [the women] kept covered: the 
streets have become predatory.  Everywhere I went, there were huge crowds of men 
staring at me.  'You can see why we choose to stay covered,' said my 
interpreter.  'These men make us feel ashamed'" (Logan xix).  This idea of 
protection from lustful men has become a motivator for women to remain veiled.  
This veil from the world and men allow for a level of security in a world of 
changes. 
 
Another motivator to staying covered was that it helped to bring a unity with 
themselves and other Muslim women.  "The Muslim woman image overrides all others 
to constitute these women's primary identities (Cooke 131).  The idea that being 
a woman is not enough of a distinction--they want to be known as a Muslim 
woman.  Especially with the increasing number of converts to Islam, many other 
ethnicities are finding the hijab as a way to bond with other women 
within their faith (Droogsma 302).  With so many different cultures encapsulated 
by Islam, the idea of reinforcing similarities rather than differences is a 
great drive amongst women who may feel that they aren't understood.  However, 
this idea works in many different ways with different ramifications.  
Interestingly, when speaking about this topic to an Egyptian friend, she 
revealed that she veils when at home in Houston, but not while abroad since 
there is much confusion about her faith.  Being a conservative Christian from a 
small sect in Egypt, she is expected to veil, though when abroad it is assumed 
that she is Muslim because of this behavior (Tadross).  For her, the idea of 
veiling is for a bonding within her church in Houston, very similar to the 
Muslim women who veil for the communal aspects, but once these ties are no 
longer attainable, she removes the veil.  The idea that veiling is 
counterintuitive to modernity is just too simplistic with so many factors in 
play.  
 
What my studies have led me to understand is that the issue of veiling is not 
black and white.  There are numerous reasons for women to veil and there are 
many reasons for the reactions from non-veiled people.  There are many 
dimensions and reasonings behind this culture of veiled women.  Being from a 
Western culture where we tend to have the attitude that we always know best 
(seemingly echoing some Colonialistic views), it would be easy to just disregard 
any groups that continue to be veiled as being oppressed or unenlightened.  In 
the end, it seems that there are women on both sides of the fence--both choosing 
to remain veiled and some being forced into this lifestyle. 
 
Alloula, Malek.  The Colonial Harem.  University of Minnesota: 1986.  
 
Droogsma, Rachel Anderson.  
"Redefining Hijab: American Muslim Women's Standpoint on Veiling".  Journal of 
Applied Communication (01 Aug. 2007): 35:3.  Academic Search Complete.  EBSCO.  
UHCL, Clear Lake, TX.  23 March 2008.  <http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content?content=10.1080/00909880701434299> 
 
Logan, Harriet.  Unveiled.  Harriet Logan: 2002. 
 
Tadross, Maryanne.  Personal interview.  14 Jan. 2008. 
 
"Veil of tears."  Economist  370.8358 (17 Jan. 2004): 44.  Academic Search 
Complete. EBSCO.  UHCL, Clear Lake, TX.  23 March 2008.  <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=11986271&site=ehost-live>. 
  
 
  
  
  
  
  |