Essay 1 – My Learning, Illustrated in Poetry
This semester really jolted my literary senses. I had never studied so
many varied texts as we did in Dr White’s American Minority Literature class. In
college I had read maybe one slave narrative that I can remember, and I think I
may have read a novella by Cisneros in elementary school, but that’s about it
for my experience in American minority literature prior to this semester.
Studying African American, Native American, Mexican American, and gay literature
all in this one semester was both a thrill and a challenge for me. In order to
illustrate my learning experience for the purpose of this final essay, however,
it will be necessary for me narrow my focus of this semester. I have decided to
highlight the poetry we studied, since this was also a new area for me and one I
very much enjoyed.
As far as poetry is concerned for this semester, I found that we had a
number of objectives to help me focus my study and aid my understanding of
minority poetry. Objective 1c[i]
asks us to observe literary strategies such as “double language” that minority
writers use to gain voice and choice. Objective 5a[ii]
points to the power of poetry to help others understand and share the minority
experience. Objective 5c[iii]
says that literacy is a sign of modernity and a path to empowerment. Objective 7[iv]
focuses on minority representations of
The first type of poetry we studied this semester was African American
poetry. We read poems by Jupiter Hammon, Langston Hughes, Countee Cullen, and
Maya Angelou. I was very moved by Angelou’s “Still I Rise,” and I thought that
Denielle’s reading of it in class was beautiful. Looking over the poem now and
the notes that I took from the class discussion that we had over it, I am still
very excited by this poem. However, I was most inspired by Jupiter Hammon’s
poem, “An Evening Thought: Salvation by Christ, With Penitential Cries.” This
poem, written and published by a man who was a slave his entire life, along with
the slave narratives we read by Olaudah Equiano, Frederick Douglass, and Harriet
Jacobs, led me to study the topic of American slave literature in both of my
Research Posts for this semester. I was especially interested to see how they
used literature to empower themselves (Obj 5c) and I wanted to gain a more
emotional understanding of their experiences through their literary expression
(Obj 5a). In our class discussion of “An Evening Thought,” there was much debate
over the many potential meanings of the word “salvation” in the poem (an example
of “double language” from Obj 1c). Are we to read “salvation” as meaning freedom
from slavery? Or death, and thereby an escape from slavery? Or is the poet
talking about his own religious salvation or salvation for the slaveholders and
thereby legal freedom for the slaves? The language in Hammon’s poem is working
very hard here. I had never spent so much time and thought on a single poem, and
my mind was stirred and I was very moved by Hammon’s words. I like to think that
I have a better understanding of the feelings and struggles of certain African
Americans, thanks to the beautiful and carefully chosen poems we read this
semester.
After our African American unit, I was excited to find a similarity
between the Native American and Mexican American literature we read in the
middle of the semester (to be illustrated by my discussion of their poetry)—much
of it can be studied in terms of their emphasis on borders, margins, space, and
the dichotomy between their respective minority culture and the American
dominant culture. I admit that I have not read any poetry from either culture
outside of what we read for this class, so my little thesis may not hold, but it
seems interesting to me for now. Also the ability to understand
both groups as native minority groups
in America—rather than Native Americans being the only “native” group and
Mexican Americans being understood as immigrants—was an intriguing idea to me.
(I am referencing our class discussions that mentioned the
Gay literature was yet another brand-new experience for me this semester.
In this unit I realized that I may be most interested in poetry because it can
help me understand an otherwise unknowable experience (slavery and most other
minority experiences besides homosexuality are foreign to me, of course, but it
was during our unit on gay literature that I most appreciated the chance to live
vicariously, as in Obj 5a). While the Whitman poem we read was insightful in its
complexity, and Juan did an impressively educational interpretation of it, I
found it hard to connect to. Frank O’Hara’s poem, “My Heart,” was the one that
really grabbed me. I read this poem quickly before class and even then, in my
hastiness toward it, it spoke to me. I liked how personal the voice of the
narrator sounded and the last few lines, with his bare feet, unshaven face, and
wishing that “the better part of [his heart], [his] poetry, is open,” left me
feeling open and light. I did not exactly feel happy but I felt like I wanted to
be happy, like I was open to happiness. I felt like I understood him in that
poem, even if that is not what he meant exactly. As I said in the beginning, this semester was a lot for me to carry, but I think I came out of it balancing all that I learned. I dealt with many diverse texts, styles, and genres and enjoyed them all very well. This semester gave me many opportunities to understand where a few American minorities have been and where they hope to go in future generations. I hope this paper has illustrated the growth I have made with my discussion of the class’s poetry assignments.
[i]
Objective 1c. To observe alternative identities and literary
strategies developed by minority cultures and writers to gain voice
and choice:
· “double
language” (same
words, different meanings to different audiences)
· using the dominant culture’s words against them
· conscience to dominant culture (which otherwise forgets the
past).
[ii]
Objective 5a. To discover the power of poetry and fiction to help
"others" hear the minority voice and vicariously share the
minority experience.
[iii]
Objective 5c. To regard literacy as the primary code of modern
existence and a key or path to empowerment.
[iv]
Objective 7. To survey minority representations of the
[v]
http://coursesite.uhcl.edu/HSH/Whitec/LITR/5731/models/finals/finals06sp/f06splynch.htm
Essay 2 – Minority Family Groups as a Survival Technique
The concept of family is an important one in much of minority
literature. As we have seen in class this semester, especially in the
Native American and Mexican American units, minority writers show the
network of support that minority people establish within their extended
families. Objective 6[v]
from our class focuses on this trend, and I am proposing that the
extended families and support networks that minority groups set up help
to retain their traditions, their language, and the things they want to
pass on of their old country and old ways. The literature from our
class, the Native American and Mexican American literature more
precisely, shows this use of extended families to preserve the
minorities’ culture.
One of the first examples of this phenomenon that I thought of
was in Bless Me, Ultima. Once Ultima comes to live with Antonio
and his family, she begins training him in the ways of the
curanderos. She teaches him
how to communicate with nature, which herbs to use in certain
circumstances, and how to deal with people. Ultima is regarded with much
respect and awe by those who know and love her, but she is feared as a
witch by many of the townspeople in
Ultima’s relationship with Antonio is, to me, similar to Black
Elk’s relationship to John G. Neihardt as represented in Black Elk
Speaks. Black Elk had had a vision when he was very young, and he
held on to it for half a century before he finally revealed the fullness
of it to anyone. He never told even his sons as much of the vision as he
did to Neihardt when they met at Black Elk’s reservation. The first day
that Black Elk and Neihardt met, Black Elk told Neihardt that he had
much to teach him. He said to Neihardt that “you were sent to save
[Black Elk’s vision], and you must come back so that I can teach you”
(from the Preface to the 1961 Edition). Black Elk chose Neihardt to
carry on his knowledge and experience the way Ultima chose Antonio, and
Neihardt seemed equally as eager and honored as Antonio to receive it.
Like Ultima and Antonio, Black Elk and Neihardt are not biological
family but Black Elk accepts Neihardt and he and his children are even
made members of Black Elk’s Lakota tribe.
Love Medicine deals with family in a different, more
traditional way than do either Ultima or Black Elk. Most
of the people in Love Medicine are actually related to each other; this
is a traditional extended family. The families in Love Medicine,
like Ultima and Black Elk, rely on the people closest to them to carry
on the history, tradition, and culture of the family. On and off the
reservation, family members come and go; they get adopted in with other
relatives or friends. One of the main traditions carried down through
the five generations covered in the novel is the family rivalries. The
Kashpaws, Lazarres, Morrisseys, Pillagers, and Lamartines do not get
along, whether they remember why or not; they have many criss-crossing
prejudices. Another legacy that seems important in Love Medicine
is the family cooking. Just a few pages into the novel, the narrative
and the dialogue pick up in the kitchen—around apple pie fixings, diced
pickle cubes, gossip, and heavy-handed hints about marriage (“The
World’s Greatest Fisherman,” Ch 2 – “Albertine Johnson”). The three
generations represented by Marie, Zelda, and Albertine (grandmother,
mother, and daughter respectively) tell stories in the kitchen with
other relatives as they come and go. Throughout the novel we come back
to Marie’s kitchen, and there is always food.
The poem “Green Chile” also deals with traditional cooking in the
family. It seems the narrator, like Zelda and Albertine in Marie’s
kitchen, fully appreciates the skill and love his grandmother applies
when cooking her green chiles. Even though he himself favors the
less-traditional flavours of the red chile, he understands the
importance the green chile has to his grandmother. He also mentions in
the last stanza the significance the green chile has to the people of
his Mexican American culture, and says that they “relive this old,
beautiful ritual [of cooking the green chiles] again and again.”
Minority groups in
|