|
LITR 5535 American Romanticism Monday 21 March: Harriet Jacobs, Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, N 812-834. Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life . . . , N 939-973.
Monday 16 October: Research Proposal Due (within 72 hours of class). Harriet Jacobs, Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, N 812-834. Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life . . . , N 939-973. selection reader / discussion leader: Tish Wallace poetry: Robert Hayden, "Those Winter Sundays," N 2669 poetry
reader / discussion leader:
Anuruddha Ellakkala
Assignments proposals due this week If my reply seems inadequate, don't hesitate to write again--provide more info and ask questions
Next week, continue readings in American Romantic literature of "American Renaissance" with historic interest added to usual literary analysis. Monday 23 October: Abraham Lincoln, N 757-760. Harriet Beecher Stowe, selections from Uncle Tom’s Cabin, N 771-806. Thoreau, N 837-853 (“Resistance to Civil Government”). selection reader / discussion leader: Leigh Ann Moore specific social problem: two generations after "All men are created equal," slavery grows and spreads larger social problem: experiment of moral society in a political state in which religion is private, neither promoted nor discouraged by the state (issue is not just political but economic: capitalism defines good in terms of property and profits, not any higher spiritual good--though the concepts are not necessarily contradictory) How to influence the American state morally? civil disobedience backgrounds
Monday 30 October: Ralph Waldo Emerson, N 482-497, 514-519, 527-533, 539-544 (introduction & opening sections of Nature, The American Scholar, Divinity School Address, & Self-Reliance). (Each student should try to finish at least one of these essays.) Margaret Fuller, N 760-771. selection reader / discussion leader: Bill Wolfe poetry: Denise Levertov, "The Jacob's Ladder," N 2708 poetry reader / discussion leader: Cindy L. Goodson
1. European Romanticism > American Romanticism > African America? 2. Romanticism as escapist nonsense or historical engagement? 3. 1776: All men are created equal > 1840s-1865: greater realization
1. European Romanticism > American Romanticism > African America?
Classes with names like "American Romanticism" or "Medieval Literature" or "Modernism" are called "period surveys." Earlier this semester, discussed "periodization"
(from first class on Last of the Mohicans) Study of literary and cultural periods = "periodization" Some students and scholars don't like study of periods > idea that literary texts should stand above or outside history, speak across history to us Downside to this approach: student is stuck with appreciating what s/he would have already liked anyway, little chance to learn or grow Advantages of periodization: Building blocks of the past--avoids "flattening" of the past that we're all prone to
Another common objection to periodization: locks all writers in same box; e. g., if this is a Romantic author, s/he must love nature . . . . But periodization can also be used to measure difference; for instance, later in semester, Whitman writes during the Romantic period but with increasingly Realistic subject matter
Add: Study of periods can develop knowledge of cultural evolution or progress--how does one style or concept of art lead to another? How does a style survive? Potential downside: Period surveys are often a parade of "great men" and "great texts"--"the authors who made history" This kind of linear, progressive history can sometimes exclude a lot of literature written by "others"--Literature from the ground up instead of from the court down . . . But with more students and instructors trained in multicultural literature, the problem may be in process of resolution (or evolution)
Objective 2: Cultural Issues: America as Romanticism, and vice versa · Americans as racially divided but historically related people develop "Old and New Canons" of Romantic literature, from Emerson’s Transcendentalism and Fitzgerald’s Jazz Age to the Slave Narratives of Douglass and Jacobs; the Harlem Renaissance of Hughes, Hurston, and Cullen; and the American Indian as a conflicted Romantic icon in Cooper and Zitkala-Sa. (Mexican American Literature is not yet incorporated into this course—class will discuss.) American Indians are romanticized by dominant culture, sometimes as gothic demons or hell-hounds (compare today's terrorists), increasingly as nature-loving noble savages. Indians' own Romantic reaction is difficult to categorize. Sometimes Indians play up to Romantic image or use Romantic principles as rhetorical devices, but depth or uniformity of commitment is iffy. Point: American Romanticism involves non-European people(s), whose presence complicates categories or universality of "Romantic spirit." Other major race involved in American Romanticism: African American congruities with Romanticism: Abolition movement corresponds to American Renaissance (1820s-1860s) Rise of first generation of major African American writers
2. Romanticism as escapist nonsense or historical engagement? Interpret positively and negatively: "S/he's a Romantic" vs. "S/he's a realist"
Can a defense of Romanticism be extended to history? American Romantic period a. k. a. "American Renaissance" 1820s-1860s ends with U. S. Civil War, 1861-65 coincidence of American Renaissance with a number of historical movements Manifest Destiny, expansion westward, Mexican War (mentioned by Thoreau) Expansion of southern tier of states meant expansion of slavery, which meant that slavery wasn't dying but vital, growing Abolition movements Women's rights movements (Seneca Falls 1848, Margaret Fuller) Utopian or communal movements (Shakers, Brook Farm, Fruitlands, Oneida) (Hawthorne lived at Brook Farm for a few months, Fuller and Emerson visited; Alcott family started Fruitlands) millennial movements: Millerites ( > 7th Day Adventists, Jehovah's Witnesses), Latter-Day Saints, Shakers Evangelical movements--"Second Great
Awakening" ("Great Awakening"--i. e., the "First Great
Awakening") was approximately a century earlier, following Jonathan Edwards
What is compatible between such a society and Romantic thought, art, and literature? Do they complement or contradict each other? Last class: period of Romanticism = period of intense social dynamics, growth, change Romanticism as anything beyond the here and now > may reflect a society for whom present reality cannot be satisfactory Contrast realism: you're supposed to settle for what you know, value what's given
review Hawthorne Two final questions re Hawthorne: gothic personal style Ultimately inseparable. Both contribute to answering the style question: How can you tell you're reading a Hawthorne text? earlier scheme from Cooper's Mohicans
Now let's change the patterns and subjects for Hawthorne
(Look for contrast with this in African American writings, for whom these identifications are threatening.) 620 [Gothic
imagination of Puritans; correspondence] 623 prayers before
daylight, evening prayer time
Hawthorne's individual style Hawthorne's style, highly identifiable--when you read a Hawthorne story or novel, how can you tell it's Hawthorne? style as both literary techniques and subject matter
truth as evanescent, ephemeral, transient, elusive: "flickering," "glimmering" "something"-- symbols qualifiers—may have, could have equality in sin critical favorite because reader participates; Hawthorne's style builds in a lot of interpretation on part of reader
Bedford Glossary of Critical Terms symbol: something that, although it is of interest
in its own right, stands for or suggests something larger and more
complex--often an idea or a range of interrelated ideas, attitudes, and
practices. What does it mean to "qualify" one's speech? "So-and-so is stupid, evil, and wrong!" (Anyone who can speak thus is extreme in their expression.) "You need to qualify what you're saying."
back it up?
"I have seen so-and-so in many situations, and in all of them s/he has acted in such a way that no reasonable person could regard them as intelligent, moral, and just." This is a qualified statement. Leaves wiggle room, room for disagreement, leaves room to keep talking and thinking.
Webster's definition: 1a. to reduce from a general to a particular or restricted form: modify 1b. to make less harsh or strict: moderate 1c. to alter the strength or flavor of d. to limit or modify the meaning of
qualifiers—may
have, could have 611 though [qualifier], likeness, almost, uncertain light 616 Either . . . or [qualifier] 617 no slight similitude [indirect language, heavily qualified]
More on Douglass Question of how to teach classic literature in a multicultural society What selection of texts? Should our readings reflect the students in the classroom, or should all students be expected to read classic texts of the western tradition? When teaching multicultural texts like Jacobs and Douglass, what methods, emphases, and lessons? Should the difference be emphasized, or the places where they meet? Specifically, should we read Douglass and Jacobs as . . . examples of slave narratives, important foundation and expression of a distinct African American literary tradition? or as examples of Romanticism?
Broad questions: In what ways is Douglass romantic? What about Douglass turns more toward a distinct African American literature than toward mainstream western literature?
some variations from light-dark value scheme European-derived model: white = goodness, purity; black = evil, decay African model? white = oppression? daytime hours as white man's time darkness = night as people's time, family time; fertility?
Some evidence of this in slave narratives, but keep in mind especially for Harlem Renaissance at end of semester.
Specific exercise: Read a passage in Douglass, evaluate for both
P. 957 in anthology “Sunday was my only leisure time. . . . My sufferings on the plantation seem now life a dream rather than a stern reality. Our house stood within a few rods of the Chesapeake Bay, whose broad bosom was ever white with sails . . . . “You are loosed from your moorings, and are free; I am fast in my chains, and am a slave! . . . You are freedom’s swift-winged angels, that fly around the world; . . . O that I could also go! . . . If I could fly! . . . I will run away. . . . I had as well be killed running as die standing. . . It cannot be that I shall live and die a slave. I will take to the water. This very bay shall yet bear me into freedom. . . . Meanwhile I will try to bear up under the yoke. I am not the only slave in the world. . . . It may be that my misery in slavery will only increase my happiness when I get free. There is a better day coming.” What's Romantic about this passage? What's African American?
What's Romantic? individual against backdrop of nature--> Emerson, Edwards, others transcendence escape from here and now to future day
What's African-American? "chains" aren't necessarily metaphorical "the dream"--not necessarily achieved, but still a promise
Resolutions: Literary study usually will not choose but will usually try to do more--this has problems, but it keeps voices in dialogue. Therefore, the short answer is to read Douglass and Jacobs as "Romanticism" and "Multiculturalism," not to mention Feminism and other interests. Irony: it's not a short answer . . . a semester's only so long, and students read less and less Or they're reading differently, in different media Methods of dialogue and discourse adapt us to change
Model of history and literature together 966 more than Patrick Henry 1776: American Revolution for Independence > 1840s-60s: Abolition of slavery--continuity of American experiment in equality, literacy, and self-government
assignments
(From LITR 5535 2005) web-highlight(s)
from previous semesters’ research projects: Matt Mayo
Prior to this class, I was completely
unfamiliar with the term Byronic Hero. As we discussed the term in class, I began to realize that
many of the “common” heroes of today, at least partially, fit our
definition. Our example of Magua,
from The Last of the Mohicans, presented a fairly good prototype. Other
characters such as Batman or William Wallace, from the movie Braveheart, also
spring to mind when discussing this topic. These characters present the full
range of human emotion. By
displaying their darkness and depth, we can more readily identify with them.
By way of contrast, heroes with purely good characteristics, or
one-dimensional heroes, are becoming more difficult to find.
In this genre, one of the first heroes to come to mind is Superman. Superman never shows us a dark or brooding side of his
character. For this hero, there is
a clear line between right and wrong, or good and evil.
As a result, we are given very little to work with in the way of depth
for the character. His background
is fairly well flushed out, yet Superman is very flat when compared to more
fully developed heroes, such as Jean Valjean from Les Miserables. Subject
Headings: What
is a Byronic Hero? Was
Byron’s life Romantic? Student
Paper & Internet Review Conclusion
After completing my research, I feel I have a
better understanding of what goes into the making of a Byronic hero.
The characteristics and traits are clearly linked to the Romantic genre
of writing. Additionally, I have a greater appreciation of how Byron's
life and personality caused the development of a new literary term.
Throughout my research, I found myself trying
to identify Byronic heroes from literature or recent movies.
While going through this process, I found myself repeatedly bumping into
the standard American success storyline. Often,
a heroic character must overcome some sort of early trauma or difficulty in
order to transcend in to something greater for the betterment of others.
In this instance, the hero may have some Byronic qualities, but
ultimately falls short of being a complete Byronic hero… Nature
in American Literature and Poetry Introduction
Nature, particularly “an uncultivated or wild
area…or a countryside,” provides colors, expression, life, and beauty
(Oxford 968). Even the idea of
wilderness, with all of its innate beauty, inspires many people, both
artistically and philosophically. For
some, beauty and nature can cause moments of ecstasy, where they are
aesthetically lifted to another plane of consciousness.
John Miller, in his essay, “Beauty: A Path to Ecstasy,” explains: Beauty
can lead us from the mundane to the sublime.
The beauty of Nature awakens in us the love of beauty; and if we respond
deeply, we may experience moments of ecstasy.
Beauty [and Nature] inspire the arts, whose very creative process may
occasion ecstasy. These experiences
reveal that love and bliss form the essence of our own nature.
(Abstract) A beautiful sight in nature evokes unexplainable
emotions and feelings within a person. This
poses the question, “How can a person possibly describe these feelings brought
about by nature?” The following
journal is an attempt to understand this question through: a better
understanding of aesthetics, a survey of American authors and poets whom often
use nature in their works, and research of the differences in Nature writing
among authors of Romantic fiction, transcendentalists, and poets of the late
nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. Aesthetics? Survey of Authors Conclusion Conclusion
Nature
can easily be considered a universal bond between human beings, in that any
person can, if they choose, experience it.
This journal only provides a starting point for research into theories
relating beauty and the environment and the way they are perceived by people.
Literature seems to be a reliable canvas for nature, as seen through the
works of Cooper, Emerson, Dickinson, Frost, and Cummings; however, other forms
of art might also express the aesthetic effects of beauty.
Further research may lead to the illustration of nature by Impressionist
painters, such as Monet, or to various musicians and their works.
|