Liz Haden Utopia: An Individual’s Fantasy?
Fantasy has been a primary mode of storytelling
for millennia as it presents a hero who must overcome a problem or conflict in
his given environment or society. Due to the fact that the surroundings are
fabricated by the creator, a model world must be created. Utopia and the concept
of fantasy are closely intertwined. Utopian literature addresses social
disruptions and creates a new idealistic world that the reader can analyze or
even base political theories upon. Is it then that the concept of utopia can
only be explored through the individual’s creative perspective? Imagination is
both difficult and a necessity. Both utopia and fantasy give a sense of
empowerment as it provides a work of art that reflects humanity's culture during
a particular period and allows insight that often provokes discourse. The concept of utopic societies
has been around and conceptualized since the days of Plato. Due to the problems
that arise within any given society, “writers have expressed their dreams in the
form of literary utopias” (Colmer 1). The imagination makes utopia possible as
people can fantasize about progressive societies that both address real world
problems and motivate people for change. Colmer cites Arthur Koestler who upon
examination stated that all utopias “are fed from the sources of mythology; the
social engineer’s blueprints are merely revised editions of the ancient text”
(Colmer 2). The writer is put in a place of social and moral high ground as to
create a society that cannot truly be emulated but can serve as fantastical
concept to criticize humanity and incite the imagination. Utopias are in essence
an individual’s hypothesis and the human implications that form from the change
that is implemented and therefore the primary appeal of such a genre in to the
intellect (Colmer 2).
Utopian
and dystopian literature become more abundant when social anxieties rise and an
individual places a mirror upon society by creating a new one free of distress. The
utopian outbursts at the turn of the century and even the 1960s can be
attributed to the fact that the old ways or the past is being destroyed and
humanity is paving way for a future with new possibilities (Duncombe). Duncombe
states in his lecture
Utopia is No Place: The Art and Politics of Impossible
Futures that “rational critique no longer
has critical function” and people are moving toward an imaginative or
fantastical approach. This I believe is due to the fact that utopia is better
explored as an individual who is able to address certain concerns and form their
literary work based upon their ideals. When the thought of a utopia is brought
to the collective, more problems arise. The fantasy world that is created allows
us to focus on becoming greater than we currently are. It provides a space for
the audience to examine polarities and formulate opinions on the presented
society in comparison to their own. The
concept of utopia is a fantasy of the individual for the collective. It is only
possible for a society to be perfect in its entirety to one person because when
others become involved in the fantasy, conflict and debate arise. As Jacob
McCleese stated in
Utopian Rhetoric: Dancing to the Beat,
“many utopian fictions, take More’s Utopia for example, are presented as
conversations,” allowing the individual writer to present multiple perspectives
and discourse to the audience to contemplate and debate. Work Cited: Colmer
J. (1978)
Utopian Fantasy.
In:
Coleridge to Catch-22. Palgrave Macmillan,
London
Duncombe, Steven.
Utopia Is No Place: The Art and Politics of Impossible
Futures. YouTube, Walker Art
Center, 10 Aug. 2010,
www.youtube.com/watch?v=H8BhXKGOeeY&t=657s.
McCleese, Jacob.
Utopian Rhetoric: Dancing to the Beat.
15 June 2013.
Tolkien in the
New Century: Essays in Honor of Tom Shippey,
edited by John Wm. Houghton, et al.,
McFarland & Company, Incorporated Publishers,
2014. ProQuest Ebook Central,
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uhcl/detail.action?docID=1705820.
|