Cynthia Cleveland
Hostile Takeover: Building a Utopia
Many of the utopias that we are introduced to are
already well-established and thriving societies, but rarely are we given insight
into how these societies began. After all, the point of a utopia is to put the
best possible world on display, but it is troubling that we rarely get the
answer to the question of ‘how?’ During the course of our studies thus far, the
beginning of a new utopia is only present in Ayn Rand’s
Anthem, when
Prometheus relays his plans to establish his own free society, and even there it
is only in its most basic stages of beginning. From this particular work of
fiction, it is easy to deduce from the atmosphere created in the novella that
the society is very much totalitarian, which gives the reader an idea of the
conditions necessary to attain such a society; though this characteristic is not
required, as evidenced by such established communities as Twin Oaks in Virginia.
The difference lies in scale. Rajneeshpuram, an intentional community in Oregon
during the 1980s, attempted to establish more than just a community, they
attempted to build an entire society. Thus, the question stands, does
totalitarianism lie at the root of utopian society?
Recently, I watched a documentary titled
Wild Wild Country,
which recounts the establishment of the intentional community Rajneeshpuram in
Oregon during the 1980s. Originally, this movement began in Pune, India, where
Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh, the leader of the Rajneesh commune, established his
first intentional community during the 1970s (Urban). This failed due to
financial woes and political feuds with the Indian government, which sparked the
move to the American west to establish yet another community (Abbott 417). This
community was focused on ideas of free love and self-fulfillment; many of the
teachings are rooted in Eastern religious teachings, such as Zen Buddhism and
Hinduism, combined with modern Western philosophy and psychology (Abbott 417).
The intentional community garnered a larger than life following during its four
short years in Oregon, amassing crowds as large as 15,000 during festivals, but
long-term residents were reported at 2,500 at any given time (Abbott 419). Many
of the residents sincerely cherished their community and insisted that it was
peaceful and loving, though history tells us otherwise (Wild
Wild Country).
What was most alarming concerning the establishment of
Rajneeshpuram was the criminality and violence that led to its eventual
downfall, despite the reports of peace and bliss detailed by its followers (Wild
Wild Country). In fact, it has been credited
with the largest scale domestic bioterrorist attack in United States history to
date, in a move to establish political dominance in the region (Wild
Wild Country). This particular string of events
was set in motion due to conflict with the township of Antelope (population 45),
the closest community to Rajneeshpuram (Wild
Wild Country). The local citizens, under the
impression that this was to be a small-scale community, quickly realized that
their neighbors were attempting to establish a much larger operation when they
began buying all of the surrounding properties; at which point they vehemently
expressed their dissent (Abbott 418-419). By that point they had amassed enough
real estate in the area, and petitioned the local government for township
incorporation, which was approved; even further, they eventually took over the
small town of Antelope and renamed it Rajneesh, legally (Wild
Wild Country). In retaliation, the Rajneeshees
attempted to gain the majority of seats on the local city council—they attempted
to rig the election by bussing in homeless people from nearby states, offering
free room and board (Abbott 414). To make matters worse, to ensure that the
locals were unable to vote, the Rajneeshees enacted the largest known
bioterrorist attack in United States history—they contaminated the salad bars of
local restaurants with Salmonella, effectively poisoning over 700 people
(Kaplan). This got the Center for Disease Control’s attention and led to their
inevitable dissolution (Kaplan).
The link to totalitarianism in the establishment of a
utopian society almost seems inevitable. In small, self-sustaining communities
such as Twin Oaks, a utopia is entirely possible, but to build anything larger
seems impossible without this type of manipulation. The Rajneeshees engaged in
rigorous political activities against their neighbors and engaged in an act of
bioterrorism in order to wrest political control of the city in which they
wished to establish a permanent foothold. More so, their spokesperson Ma Anand
Sheela, engaged in inflammatory and hostile rhetoric with media in defense of
their way of life and insisted that their community would indeed spread and
continue to thrive (Wild Wild Country).
If this was indeed a free and peaceful community which sought reprieve from
modern society, then it would have flourished. Instead, the community sought to
expand its borders—in the literal sense—to accommodate its growing population of
followers. This experiment then gives the sense that in order to establish a
large-scale utopian society, there would indeed have to be certain
characteristics of totalitarian authority present to account for resistance from
the local population.
Abbott, Carl. “Revisiting Rajneeshpuram: Oregon's
Largest Utopian Community as Western History.”
Oregon Historical Quarterly, vol. 116, no. 4,
2015, pp. 414–447. JSTOR,
www.jstor.org/stable/10.5403/oregonhistq.116.4.0414.
Kaplan, Michael. “How cultists used poison and
politics to take over an entire town.” New York
Post. 2018.
https://nypost.com/2018/03/17/how-cultists-used-poison-and-politics-to-take-over-an-entire-town/
Urban, Hugh. “Rajneeshpuram Was More than a Utopia in the Desert. It was a
Mirror of the Time.”
Humanities,
vol 39, no. 2, 2018. Web.
https://www.neh.gov/humanities/2018/spring/feature/rajneeshpuram-was-more-utopia-desert-it-was-mirror
Way, Chapman & Maclain Way, creators.
Wild Wild Country.
Netflix series. 2018.
|