|
Bryon Smith Jews as Utopians Shavuot - the Jewish holiday celebrating the anniversary of the receipt of the Torah at Mt. Sinai. On the night of Shavuot Jews keep vigil and study the Torah Because the holiday centers around Torah, observant Jews stay up all night in marathon study sessions known as tikkun leil Shavout (literally "Shavuot night repair," alluding to the Jewish goal of "tikkun olam," or repair of the world). http://www.beliefnet.com/story/168/story_16809_1.html Tikkun Olam – World Repair Isaac Luria, the renowned sixteenth century Kabbalist, used the phrase “tikkun olam,” usually translated as repairing the world, to encapsulate the true role of humanity in the ongoing evolution and spiritualization of the cosmos. Luria taught that God created the world by forming vessels of light to hold the Divine Light. But as God poured the Light into the vessels, they catastrophically shattered, tumbling down toward the realm of matter. Thus, our world consists of countless shards of the original vessels entrapping sparks of the Divine Light. Humanity’s great task involves helping God by freeing and reuniting the scattered Light, raising the sparks back to Divinity and restoring the broken world. http://www.innerfrontier.org/Practices/TikkunOlam.htm Longing for the Messiah Since every King is a Messiah, by convention, we refer to this future anointed king as The Messiah. The above is the only description in the Bible of a Davidic descendant who is to come in the future. We will recognize the Messiah by seeing who the King of Israel is at the time of complete universal perfection. What is the Messiah supposed to accomplish? The Bible says that he will: A. Build the Third Temple
(Ezekiel 37:26-28). Kibbutzim History The Aliyas: Aliya- Word used to describe the waves of Jewish immigration to Palestine First Aliya 1882-1903, Mostly Jews from southern Russia, eastern Europe, Yemen. Second Aliya 1904-1914, Mainly from Russia Third Aliya 1919-1923, Mainly from Eastern Europe Fourth Aliya 1924-1929, Poland and the USA Fifth Aliya 1929-1939, Eastern Europe and Germany Aliya Bet 1933-1948 110,000 Jews immigrate to Palestine, most illegally Russian Aliya, following collapse of the USSR 1880’s Zionism emerges, partly as a response to anti-Semitism in Russia 1909 Degania founded by the southern shores of Sea of Galilee, 12 people, 1914 Degania has 50 members, other kibbutzim founded around Sea of Galilee and N. Palestine 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia; borders closed to emigration; 1918 Ottoman control of Palestine passes to United Kingdom; Bigger Pogroms in east Europe as a result of post-war problems 1920’s Zionist youth movements become popular in Europe, most are socialist in nature; larger kibbutzim founded in Palestine (Ein Harod begins with 215 members c. 1920) 1921 Bloody anti-Jewish riots in Jerusalem 1929 Bloody anti-Jewish riots in Hebron 1928
Chever Hakvutzot founded,
stress on small kibbutzim, (<200 kibutzniks each) 1936-1939 Palestinian “Great Uprising” 1948 Israel founded, Kibbutzim reach their peak Kibbutzim population growth: 1909- 12 1922- 700 1927- 4,000 1937- 25,000 Kibbutz characteristics: Jewish, but not religious: Shabbat still observed, sortof, Bar Mitzvah’s celebrated, Yom Kippur used as a day to discuss future of Kibbutz The members of the First Aliya had been religious, but the members of the Second Aliya, of whom the founders of Degania were a tiny subsection, were not. Although they were settling in the land of the Bible, these young people were not the type to attend synagogue. To their minds, Orthodox Judaism was a hindrance for the Jewish people. The spiritualism of the pioneers of the kibbutz movement consisted of mystical feelings about Jewish work, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbutz Environmentally aware: Tree planting, Swamp draining, Tu B’shvat holiday revived. In addition to redeeming the Jewish nation through work, there was also an element of redeeming Eretz Yisrael, Palestine, in the kibbutz ideology. In Anti-Zionist literature that was circulating around Eastern Europe, Palestine was mocked as "dos gepeigerte land"—"the country that had died." Kibbutz members took pleasure in bring the land back to life by planting trees, draining swamps, and countless other activities to make the land more fertile. In soliciting donations, kibbutzim and other Zionist settlement activities presented themselves as "making the desert bloom Leftist and Utopian The first kibbutzniks hoped to be more than plain farmers
in Palestine. They even hoped for more than a Jewish homeland there: they wanted
to create a new type of society
where there would be no exploitation of anyone and where all would be equal. The
early kibbutzniks wanted to be both free from working for others and from the
guilt of exploiting hired work. Thus was born the idea that Jews would band
together, holding their property in common, "from each according to his
ability, to each according to his needs." Naive Members of a kibbutz, or kibbutzniks, like other participants in the Zionist movement, did not predict that there would be conflict between Jews and Arabs over Palestine. Mainstream Zionists predicted that Arabs would be grateful for the economic benefits that the Jews would bring. The left wing of the kibbutz movement believed that the enemies of the Arab peasants were Arab landowners (called effendis), not Jewish fellow farmers. By the late 1930s reality had dashed these notions of class solidarity and kibbutzniks began to assume a military role in the growing yishuv (the Jewish community in Palestine). Communal and informal: Meetings held around campfires Women’s roles more equal, less defined No money or personal property Children raised together in Children’s societies Drawbacks: Parasites No personal funds, (if you need something not found on the kibbutz, too bad) Gossip No personal choice of work assignment Job rotation, no specialization Kibbutzim today: Less communal: personal money, property, childrearing Less prestigious Less idealistic Objective 3: Given the fact that utopian communities always fail (usually sooner rather than later), what historical critique of utopias is possible beyond “They don’t work” or “It’s futile?” (For instance, the fact that utopias always fail depends on the prior fact that people continue to imagine or attempt utopias.)
3a. What relations develop between fictional and actual utopian communities? What has been the historical impact of utopian fictions? 3e. What social structures, units, or identities does utopia expose, extend, or frustrate? What changes in child-rearing, feeding, marriage, aging, etc. result? (Social units or structures: person-individual, gender, sex, family [nuclear or extended], community, village/town/city, class, ethnicity, farm, region, tribe, clan, union, nation, ecosystem, planet.)
|