Kristine Vermillion
Contemplating Fathers I enjoyed the poetry on the syllabus.
It was very insightful in the identification,
exploration and analysis of romantic elements.
The amount of poetry was propitious in showing how
the romantic traversed the boundaries of period and time.
We were able to analyze poetry from the 1700's to
the present to evidence Romanticism's power and longevity.
Without the presence of poetry on the syllabus, we
would not have been able to cover as much ground.
I really enjoyed the poetry element, and I think
more devotion to the key poets of this period would be a marvelous addition to
the syllabus.
I concur with your planned improvements.
I pushed the boundaries a little with the addition
of my own poem, and I wonder if you regret assenting to my tweaking the My
Poetry Reading presentation in this way.
As a teacher, was this a useful wager and would you
ever do it again? I evaluated the romantic elements of
Gerard Manly Hopkins' poem,
God's Grandeur in my
midterm, and I compared it to Denise Levertov's poem
Jacob's Ladder.
In that discussion I talked about the presence of
transcendence and the sublime.
I
want to return to it again, because I noticed one more point of comparison that
I want to use to discuss Romantic elements in two other poems from the syllabus.
God’s Grandeur (1877) By Gerard Manley Hopkins (1844-1889) The world is charged with the grandeur of God
It will flame out, like shining from shook foil;
It gathers to a greatness, like the ooze of oil Crushed.
Why do men then now not reck his rod? Generations have trod, have trod, have trod;
And all is seared with trade; bleared, smeared with
toil;
And wears man’s smudge and shares man’s smell; the
soil Is bare now, nor can foot feel, being shod. And, for all this, nature is never spent;
There lives the dearest freshness deep down things; And though the last lights off the black West went
Oh, morning, at the brown brink eastward, springs— Because the Holy Ghost over the bent
World broods with warm breast and with ah! Bright
wings. (not published till 1918) The elements that I just recognized in
it are desire and loss, though both are just subtly implied.
The desire is to experience the grandeur, and the
loss is felt in the cloud of civilization and all the things humanity does to
mar the beauty and grandeur.
In the first few lines the desire appears, but then
it disappears. In
the second stanza, it reappears again.
The transcendent remains, and the poem leaves us
with the expectation of the sublime and transcendence.
It elevates the experience of life over that which
disturbs.
If it was a modern poem, the poem would end at the last
stanza at the place of loss and despair--in the matter of fact, crushing reality
of life.
Yet because it brings us back to the hope and the
transcendent, it lifts us out of the clutches of reality.
The reach is beyond the grasp, and man can keep
going. I saw this same idea in Countee Cullen's "Yet Do I Marvel."
It starts with a positive view of God and then very quickly turns that view on
its head by some powerful lines about the things in this world that are so
disturbing and yet at the end there's a positive turn.
Yet Do I Marvel
Catechism Notes:
I doubt not God is good, well-meaning, kind,
← Romantic;
And did He stoop to quibble could tell why
←Job, God doesn’t stoop to
tell why.
The little buried mole continues blind,
← a truly sad and ugly
little creature
Why flesh that mirrors Him must some day die,
←made in image of God, yet
fallen
Make plain the reason tortured Tantalus
[Greek mythological figure tortured by unsatisfied
temptation]
Is baited by the fickle fruit, declare
←fallen
because man gave into temptation, ate the fruit
If merely brute caprice dooms Sisyphus
[Greek mythological king condemned to roll
stone up hill, rolls ↓ again]
To struggle up a never-ending stair.
←The curse = futility and
death; life is futile (Eccl.)
Inscrutable His ways are, and immune
←Not affected by man’s ?’s
and lack of understanding
To catechism by a mind to strewn
←Poet’s mind, petty
cares?
Ironic because the true ?’s
With petty cares to slightly understand
being asked are the REAL
hard questions ...
What awful brain compels his awful hand.
←Awful:
awesome word choice! It can mean extremely
Yet do I marvel at this curious thing:
bad or solemnly impressive
and inspiring of awe.
To make a poet black, and bid him sing!
←”Yet”
= key to the romanticism of the poem—it is
where
the
switch from the Real to the Romantic takes place … all
this
bad, and yet, there’s this reason to wonder, to hope
Marvel—something
that causes wonder, admiration, or
astonishment;
a wonderful thing
The last poem I want to discuss is
Robert Hayden's "Those Winter Sundays."
In this poem, the poet is not questioning God, but
he is questioning his father.
The reality of the everyday is very present in this
poem.
The mornings are cold.
There's hard, cracked and aching hands.
They are the remnants of a hard work week.
There's the splintering and the breaking of the
wood, and there's the fear of the child in a house where everything is less than
perfect. Those Winter Sundays
(1966) by Robert Hayden (1913-1980) Sundays too my father got up early
← too--he got up early
everyday and put his clothes on in the blueblack
cold,
then with cracked hands that ached from labor in
the weekday weather made
←he was absent because he
was working, banked fires
blaze. No one ever thanked him.
it cost him; he did it w/o thanks. I'd wake and hear the cold splintering, breaking. When the rooms were warm, he'd call, and slowly I would rise and dress, fearing the chronic angers of that
house,
←Something awful dwells
there speaking
indifferently to him,
←no appreciation for the
father who had driven out the cold and polished my good shoes as well. What did I
know, what did I know
←Here's the "yet," there's
the realization that
of love's
austere and lonely offices?
there's more to the father than realized
The father is viewed throughout the
poem as hard, distant and there's an element of fear and anger.
Yet throughout the poem, in the midst of these
observations, you see the work that the father is doing for his family.
He works hard throughout the week.
He wakes early to dispel the cold from the house.
He polishes shoes, and he wakes his family on time.
The childhood view that viewed him so
indifferently, with age sees him differently. There is a slow revelation that
there was more to the father than realized, and it opens up what was once closed
and cold.
The broadening of the vision of the father's love and its
"austere and lonely offices" is romantic because it revives the picture of what
the son once thought he knew and raises it to a higher and more aspiring and
praiseworthy level.
It is a beautiful poem.
It actually strikes a deep chord in me concerning
my own father and his life.
After he had warmed the house in the morning, he'd
wake me and my siblings by saying, "Wakey, wakey."
It was priceless, though I didn't know it at the
time, and I sorely miss it. Though I might not know how articulate
the feeling and scope of this poem, my own experience with it, as well as the
other two, indicate their worth.
In all three, there's an acknowledgement of the
real, yet all of them successfully break free from the clutches of the real to
grasp at what is beyond.
This is the source of their power.
This is the heart of Romanticism.
|