Daniel B. Stuart
Distortion of the Commonplace: A Gothic View
One of the more pedestrian but watchable movies of the 1980's was a low
budget creeper/comedy called The Burbs about residents in a neighborhood
confronting a possible mass murderer living on their street. Starring Tom Hanks
and Carrie Fisher, the film centered on a cookie cutter American subdivision in
which a new family of oddball characters has moved in to a rickety wooden house
where the previous family has seemingly vanished without a trace. It's not long
before curious developments intrigue some of the more precocious neighbors who
begin to theorize about various (mostly nighttime) goings-on in the basement of
home where strange lights and eerie sounds have been noticeable. The action
builds to a somewhat anticlimactic denouement, not quite meeting the suspenseful
and quite well-conceived premise of its earlier content. It's not necessarily
the ending which makes the film a memorable experience, though. It's the
creation and sustainment of an aura and atmosphere which inspires such an
engendered sense of fascination about the story that it’s almost enough to
relish the anticipatory elements and leave the conclusion alone. The picturesque
suburban street with its quaint domestic veneer is--and wiser viewers will catch
this right away--largely too good to be true right down to its curving lane,
dogwalkers and lamp posts. Yet that's why the situation is cultivated so
brilliantly--the almost dreamlike facade threatened by the one unit (in this
case the one lot) not in line with the rest of the pack enhances the appeal.
This is where we see the Gothic so readily apparent; not in characters or
characterization so much as with plot and setting. The power and consistency of
the Gothic lies in the distortion of the commonplace to such an abstracted
dimension that the imagination and elements of the sublime can be fully
realized. Regardless of the variety within the genre--European, American
Wilderness or Southern Gothic--the resonating themes all operate within this
rhetorical device.
The Burbs is somewhat farcical even by Gothic standards. Yet we as
the audience can appreciate the efforts it makes to create at least the
possibility for a good story. Of course herein lies a major flaw of the Gothic
as a genre: its inability to capitalize on the manifestations of mood, suspense,
terror and grandiose settings. Much like nostalgia largely exists as a
manufactured illusion about the past, the Gothic is most prominently realized as
a place in the mind permanently separated from reality. Our sensibility to
Gothic tropes and themes comes largely as a result of this intentional
misperception. Its appeal is its ability to conjure a sense of and curiosity (at
a darker level) which can only exist and flourish in this suspended reality. The
cover art for Gothic romances is so good at exploring this aura of mystery
and secrecy that it's almost a disappointment to actually read the text.
We don't know the girl in the picture but we make guesses and create
suppositions based on that Gothic place in our mind. Authors of course employ
these elements by reverting back to these same themes of shadows, decay,
brooding characters, ominous discoveries. They too shroud their stories in a
fanciful world where the setting, mood and premise (absent the ending) are the
primary instruments of appeal. Almost always this world is very commonplace with
little to disturb it other than the primary Gothic element intruding on the
scene.
We meet Goodman Brown as he bids adieu to his wife and embarks on what we
sense is a perilous outing. The "dreary road" he takes is "darkened by the
gloomiest trees of the forest." The dense foliage virtually envelops him into
its depths, sealing the way back as the trees "closed immediately behind." His
journey is a solitary one, "as lonely as could be" (Hawthorne 640). The imagery
being what it is, the reader is unlikely to think of clumps of trees off to the
side of the highway, walking trails or even typically wooded areas. We don't
need any music or moving pictures to think of the man on his journey into the
forest at night; in fact, those things might be unnecessary or superfluous,
diminishing the place in our thoughts, the visualization and corresponding
emotional connection to the man's circumstances. Moreover, we don't know much of
Goodman Brown. We find out that he seems to be a pious man, something of a holy
fool oblivious to fallen man's propensities toward evil. It's not just any sins
which are chiefly involved either, but the mystical occult which confronts the
protagonist. As well it should be; the place in our mind would find it hard to
maintain the same depth of intrigue the vices were mere lack of "temperance" or
gluttony.
The Gothic in Young Goodman Brown is capitalized by the inclusion of
perhaps the most tantalizing character in all literature. The devil and his
faustian proposal make the story a classic. To emphasize the concept of the
distortion of the commonplace, we should state that the story is not a fantasy.
Biblical allusions--and generally without regards to age or time period--are
credible sources of Gothic material, likely the most credible sources. Science
Fiction, fantasy, mythologies and pagan religions are all well and good, but
they don't contain the authority which Western Civilization associates with the
Bible. Consequently, our place in the mind becomes all the more well-realized
when Biblical themes and allusions are incorporated. Even among the
non-practicing, the Bible is such a pinnacle of the western canon, that
emotional integrity of the Gothic ambience still remains strong. To use a modern
day example, think of the readers of popular vampire novels who genuinely yearn
for vampirism to be real, to have a tinge of authentic origins; the Gothic mood
is not as complete without it and thus vampire stories can run the risk of
merging into pure fantasy. Bram Stoker was able to avoid this pitfall by
connecting the vampire legend to a real person, Vlad Tepes. Thus his Gothic
novel was able remain as a distortion of the commonplace (more conceivable)
rather than a pure fairy tale requiring more of a suspended imagination (less
concievable).
Poe may have written one of the most Gothic of statements
in "The Fall of The House of Usher" when the narrator asks why he's so
"unnerved" at the daunting estate as he approaches it. In reply, he states that
"it was a mystery all insoluble, nor could I grapple with the shadowy fancies
that crowded upon me as I considered" (Poe 702). Everything is here: physical
elements pointing to decay, uncomfortable mood, solitary figure, as yet
untouched secrets shrouded in mystery and the "fanciful" compulsion to engage
all of it. The narrator is hardly a character; Poe's rhetoric stays concentrated
on the mood of the place, the demeanor of Usher, a creeping madness and the
hinted at secrets involving dejection and despair. Though we have supernatural
elements, they are so consistent with the Gothic mood that we're hardly
surprised or disillusioned at their occurrence. The climax is energetic but the
tone is still the same; there's such an attention paid to individual feelings
and the emphasis on emotion is so prevalent that we can accept the fact there's
a ghost in the house, or more grotesquely, a prematurely buried individual.
Where Poe seemed inordinately preoccupied with premature burials,
Faulkner employed the almost as horrific invention of an unburied corpse to
highlight his Southern Gothic story "A Rose For Emily." But Miss Emily is more
than just a decayed visage from a forgotten past and her madness says more than
we gather at first glance. Unable to intermingle with her social peers and
largely influenced by her overbearing father, we sense that the tragedy and the
real Gothic element of the story is the extreme commonplace elements which meet
with the changing standards of a wider, more progressive world. The result is
not a distortion by the author of ordinary circumstances ultimately
interpellated by an unnatural or extraordinary occurrence, but a very grotesque
result of very natural circumstances. Additionally, one might say Faulkner's
symbolism of the decaying Southern lady representing the decline and ugly fall
of the Old South meets with the equally conflicting emotion of a dead but
unburied past. Homer Barron, a yankee, lies murdered yet still preserved just as
the South is unwilling to bury its own former history with the North.
Consequently the "match" of the yankee and the southern belle can only end in,
well, a highly distorted relationship.
It would be wrong to say that the Gothic doesn't have some type of
permanent appeal, perhaps even more than Romanticism as a whole. Its attraction
is more widespread, its milieu more self-contained. It's a reflection on
individuality and the human condition more than anything. The darker places of
our minds are never far away for many people. Finding an identification of sorts
in the form of literature offers solace, even encouragement to the minds not
inclined toward frivolity or for people just wanting to explore the darker
elements. The problem with the Gothic is that it is too often unsatisfying as a
text. A good Gothic tale can spurn intrigue but often fails to follow through on
the spate of emotion delivered prior to the climax. Too many times is the
mystery more gratifying than the truth. The place in the mind where we can go to
access the Gothic is too often diminished by the resolution. Yet this shouldn't
depreciate the power and significance of the Gothic experience. Perhaps
voyeurism is never far away from the genre. The Gothic often deals with, well,
personal secrets and lies. However, I don't believe that this is as much a
correlation. For the Gothic, as we've said is a distortion of the commonplace.
Irregularity and the acceptance of the extraordinary are what make it what it
really is.
|