|
LITR 4632: Literature of the Future Student Presentation, 2001 [Instructor's note: Due to my error this student was not scheduled for a presentation at a class meeting, but she submitted the following summary of the presentation she would have given. My thanks to her for making the best of the situation.] Devon Kitch July 4,2001 Chaos and Cloning
Film: Jurassic Park directed by Steven Spielberg Objective: To define chaos theory and discuss its effects on the future of science in the area of cloning. Summary: In the movie Jurassic Park, scientists create dinosaurs from the DNA found in mosquitoes that have been fossilized in amber. Hammond decides to use this scientific accomplishment to create a theme park that resembles a zoo. Unlike other zoo animals, dinosaur behavior has not been studied and, therefore, cannot be predicted. When the power is shut off by a disgruntled employee, the dinosaurs take up their natural instinct to kill. Sources: Jurassic Park directed by Steven Spielberg http://www.mathjmendl.org/chaos/#intro http://www.discovery.com/exp/mammoth/cloned.html Questions: 1. Do scientists think before they act, or do they only concern themselves with whether they can accomplish a difficult task or not?
Excerpts from Jurassic Park
Information about chaos theory
Discussion I think that the movie Jurassic Park is a wonderful example of chaos theory. The movie shows the unpredictability (however exaggerated!) that comes with creating new, unknown life. Malcolm predicted what would happen on the island by his theory of unpredictability. The scientists created the life but then the life took on its own personality. Dinosaurs that were supposed to be all female ended up mating and laying eggs. The dinosaurs did not have to adhere to parks schedules or eating times. They had control through out the entire movie. I believe that we should be careful with cloning. Dinosaurs were created for a reason and they died off for a reason. Scientists are now talking about re-creating the mammoth, which is another animal we have little knowledge of. It would be a great educational experience, but were the experiment to go wrong, it could endanger humans. On the other hand, this animal would be created for the sole purpose of being caged and studied, and probed, and then probably dissected. The scientists would bring the animal back to life and then kill its spirit and take away what little freedom it had when it was dying. If we could find DNA of Neanderthals I have no doubt that scientists would want to try and clone them. These men would be lost in our modern society and just like the mammoth, they would be a science experiment. Even when I am told the benefits of cloning, for food and medical reasons, it still scares me to the point that I do not think it should be permitted. If you cloned a person for its organs, then who is to say that that person was not real. I would have to hear a very persuasive argument for cloning, to convince me that it is humane. Creation should be left in the hands of God. In Jurassic Park, Malcolm makes the statement "God created dinosaur, God destroyed dinosaurs, God created man, man destroys God, man creates dinosaurs," which is true in today’s society, but not necessarily with dinosaurs. Man has tried taking God out of everything, and now man is trying to create animals and people so that God is taken out of the equation.
|