|
LITR 4632 Literature of
the Future Bryan
Lestarjette June
30, 2005 It
is said the road to hell is paved with good intentions. This is a common theme
in literature of the future, being quite prominent in the more dystopian and
cautionary SF tales. Bad situations and undesirable futures in these stories are
generally the result of a good and respectable plan gone awry. Sometimes the
mistake is overreacting to a problem, or perhaps enforcing a utopian strategy
that stifles the individuals. In all cases, the road from the present to the
future is made up of decisions made for a reason that seems perfectly fine to
the decision-makers. In
"Drapes and Folds" by Audrey Ferber, new fabrics are invented that
prevent sickness and cancer. The government enforces the use of these materials
in the form of the Bracie, which also forces all bodies into the same shape so
that no figure is better or worse or different from any other. Meanwhile, all
other clothes and fabrics are banned and confiscated. The goals are hardly evil,
and in fact promote good health, but the result is oppression and prohibition of
personal expression and style. "The
Logical Legend of Heliopause and Cyberfiddle" and "The Onion and
I" show futures in which virtual reality is substituted for physical
reality. These virtual worlds are seemingly perfect and flawless. However, while
the Ideal certainly has an important place, the characters in these stories find
themselves longing for a trace of the real world, which can never be perfectly
simulated. In Parable of the Sower, virtual reality is portrayed almost as a
kind of drug, which has its beauties but should not replace the physical world.
As Sandy Murphy argues in her 2003 final exam, both the Ideal and the Physical
have their place in the human experience. In
Jurassic Park, John Hammond seeks to make something real, not an illusion like a
flea circus, and he wants to create a wonderful place where everyone, rich or
poor, old or young, can witness what he has prepared for them. Unfortunately,
things get out of hand because of insufficient preparation, poor planning,
misplaced trust, and most importantly, that they fail to take Chaos Theory and
the adaptability of the dinosaurs into consideration. The result is catastrophe
through three movies (so far). In
Gibson's "Hinterlands" and the film Minority Report, the government
utilizes research methods to the great good of society, but does not reveal the
true costs to the public. In "Hinterlands", human beings are
essentially sacrificed along the Highway in hopes that they might possibly
return (dead) with something that will advance scientific knowledge in an
extreme measure. Of course they rarely do, but the few successes are fantastic.
In Minority Report, pre-cogs are able to anticipate violent crimes so they can
be prevented. What the public does not know is the suffering and manipulation
endured by the pre-cogs, as well as the fact that they sometimes disagree and
thus potentially innocent people are executed. Both of these stories explore
cost-benefit ratios, and question whether the public would go along with these
government programs if it knew the whole truth. They seem to disagree with the
Star Trek mantra, "The good of the many outweighs the good of the
few." While
the public in "Hinterlands" and Minority Report are told half-truths,
some stories involve outright deception. In the Genesis/Revelation narrative,
Satan and the Antichrist deceive and manipulate Eve and mankind into
disobedience to God and eventually worship of the Antichrist. In Octavia E.
Butler's Parable of the Sower, the Olivar Corporation is tricking people into
trading their freedom and independence for security. Some
future-focused literature deals with well-intentioned dystopias, and some tell
stories of good people being deceived into making wrong decisions, but many are
simply tales of self-interest or survival with disregard to others. This is more
of a Darwinian survival-of-the-fittest mentality. "They're
Made Out of Meat," "The Poplar Street Study," and H.G. Wells' The
War of the Worlds are about aliens with cold indifference towards mankind. In
Terry Bisson's "They're Made Out of Meat," the aliens refuse to
communicate with men or even officially recognize their existence because they
considerate it beneath them to deal with meat, even intelligent meat. Such
discrimination is awful and amusing at the same time, but hardly unrealistic. In
fact the alien intellects seem strangely human because of it. In "The
Poplar Street Study," humans are simply lab-rats and guinea pigs for the
aliens. In The War of the Worlds, the Martians see Earthlings as animals (both
pest and food-source). Their "war" is seen by them as really more of
an extermination. "Mozart
in Mirrorshades" tells a somewhat similar story, in which Realtimers invade
a branch of the past to take its oil and treasures, and distribute cool gadgets
and anachronistic pleasures as European explorers might give beads to the
natives. They act completely inconsiderately of the alternate future of the
people they have invaded, who have temporarily lost their independence, have had
their culture contaminated, and will someday be short in energy resources. In
"Stone Lives," it is dog-eat-dog for the people of the Bungle. The
situation is not all that different for the major corporations that now rule the
world and vie for dominance and survival. Parable of the Sower and "Speech
Sounds" paint pictures of desperate mobs, each person fighting to survive
in the face of societal collapse. Literature
of the Future, like all literature, deals at some level with human nature.
Unlike love stories, which deal with emotion, or other genres with their own
focuses, literature of the future focuses on decisions. Sometimes the decisions
in SF stories lead to utopia and sometimes to dystopia (or somewhere in
between), but they are always significant. They are usually justified by
arguments concerning the greater good, are sometimes made blindly under
manipulation or deception, and are sometimes based on pure self-interest. The
purpose of science fiction and its related genres is to examine the potential
consequences of the decisions we make today. SF writers throw out their ideas
about where we might be headed, and we as readers determine how right-on they
are and how we should thus alter the course (or at least attempt to do so).
Literature of the future provides a framework in which to analyze present
situations and options, a framework built by a great many people in
conversation, counterpoint, and consensus with each other. The future belongs to
us all, and we all should have a say in it. 12:00-2:00
|