LITR 4370 TRAGEDY
Model Assignments

Midterm2 Samples 2017
(midterm2 assignment)

Model Answers to Part 2. Begin Research Report

Part 3. Begin Research Report: Write at least 3-4 substantial paragraphs with two sources toward completion of your Research Report on selected special topic (to be completed on Final Exam)  (Index)

Faron Samford

Teaching the Tragic Flaw

          I initially approached this essay with the intention of criticizing the practice of being overly reliant on the use of the tragic flaw when teaching tragedy. One of the great difficulties students and teachers often have with tragedy is the tendency to concentrate and focus on the tragic flaw, while leaving much of the other conventions of the genre mostly unexplained. As I was organizing my thoughts on this, I began to see it from another perspective. The concept of the tragic flaw, “whose misfortune is brought about not by vice or depravity, but by some error or frailty,” is first explained thusly in Aristotle’s Poetics (13b). The complexity of the tragic flaw is that the hero’s flaw isn’t based on them being an evil person, but a flaw that causes them to commit a mistake while often trying to do what they think is right. While focusing on the tragic flaw doesn’t have encompass the full range of the genre, it nevertheless serves as an important tool for introducing readers to the genre.

  Having experienced tragedies taught through various high school and university courses, Dr. White’s Tragedy class is one of the few that actually explore more of the characteristics of the genre. Before entering the class, I would’ve summed up tragedy as a genre by saying that a great hero or nobleman is brought down by his tragic flaw, or weakness, leading to his death, ruin, or the ruin of his family.  By all other descriptions, Hamlet is a well-respected character and considered a good man. His indecisiveness, leading to the death of everyone in the royal family of Denmark, is his tragic flaw, but it stems from his desire to be sure that what he is doing is right (Shakespeare, Hamlet). Similarly, the downfall of the family of Oedipus is caused by his determination to find out the killer of his father was and lift the curse on Thebes, despite warnings from Tiresias the soothsayer (Sophocles, Oedipus Rex).  Oedipus is not driven to find the killer to enhance the greatness of his name, he is pursuing it so vigorously in order to relieve the curse on Thebes, so that his people can thrive. Defining these characters by their easily recognizable tragic flaws “satisfies a common human impulse to isolate or localize blame to the faults of individuals instead of larger social systems or institutions” (Tragic Flaw course site page).  The character arc of the tragic hero is usually very important to the plot, and according to Aristotle’s Poetics, “character is the second most important element of tragedy after the plot” (Tragic Flaw course site).  Studying the tragic flaw encompasses covering these two most important aspects of tragedy, but fails to really address the comments and questions the authors are making about society and morality.

          The teaching of the tragic flaw is often done as almost a key to the texts that unlocks the text. In the depth that it is explored in high schools and lower level university classes, this enables the instructor to pass along one of the main ideas of these texts in a way that can be understood by students in a short amount of time. Part of this is due to the fast paced nature of high school lesson schedules and, as Michael McDonald states “at the high school level, most students don’t have the knowledge to reach into history or various other literatures to understand what tragedy is attempting to present to its audience” (Model Answers 2015). I feel this is a key motivation for the teaching of the nature of tragedy in high school classes because understanding Nietzsche’s Birth of Tragedy, as explained by Michaela Fox, “require(s) a level of thought way outside of traditional thinking processes” (Model Answers 2015). Most high school students are not ready to delve into the duality of Apolline/Dionysiac interplay that invests tragedy with a deeper meaning. Very view teenagers have the life experience, or exposure to other works of tragedy to draw parallels and really understand concepts addressed by the genre. Focusing on the tragic flaw allows teachers to expose the students to tragedies and helps them to have some small understanding of them, which can help them in the future when they begin to encounter them at higher levels.

          Another reason why the tragic flaw is leaned so heavily upon in lower level education is because it can be used to take very complex ideas about the nature of humans and allow them to be put in more easily understood terms. It is also an easy way for a teacher to receive feedback to the level of understanding that individual students are reaching with the work. While a student may be able to understand the complexities of Oedipus being punished for his actions, despite committing them unknowingly, they may not have refined the ability to explain this in an essay. In an environment like the modern school system, where teachers are evaluated based on how their students do on tests, the tragic flaw in a work is something that can easily be determined if the student is understanding or not.

          The tragic flaw is an integral part of works from the tragedy genre. Its ties to the character, and often importance to the plot, help students make early inroads into learning about tragedy. It can be an extremely valuable way for instructors to introduce students to the genre, but should also be expanded upon by delving into how it relates to the grander themes and societal/human nature commentary incorporated by the author.