LITR 4370 TRAGEDY
Midterm2 Samples 2015

(midterm2 assignment)

Model Answers to Part 2.
Continue Learning about Tragedy Essay

Part 2. Learning about Tragedy 2: Revise, continue, improve, & Extend Essay begun in Midterm1 on learning experience with tragedy, extending to include Sophocles's Family of Oedipus plays. (Revise / improve midterm1 draft & add at least 5-7 paragraphs for 9-10 paragraph total.) 

Fariha Khalil

3 April 2015

Learning through Tragedy

            Before taking this course, I assumed tragedy meant misconceptions and misunderstanding between the characters, which eventually lead to death in the end. I never thought about tragedy as describing the human mind and nature, until taking this class. According to Aristotle’s Poetics, Tragedy is an imitation of life and confronts problems; it shows humanity in its most realistic way possible making it the greatest literary genre. I have also learned that characters in tragedy are not good or bad.  They can be doing something that looks bad from the view of the society but in fact what they are doing is for a good cause. I agree with Kaitlin Jaschek that “Tragedy is real life because it displays the imperfections of humans, the character is not always good or always bad they are a mixture, and at times they are in predicaments that lead to hard decisions and/or consequences” (Model Assignments).   An example of that can be seen in Aeschylus’s Oresteia trilogy. In the first part of the trilogy, Agamemnon has sacrificed his daughter in order to save the lives of thousands during wartime, then when he returns, his adulterous wife, Clytaemnestra, murders him for the revenge of her daughter. Afterwards, their son, Orestes, kills his mother and her new husband, for the revenge of his father’s murder, but then his guilt or the Furies haunt him until Aphrodite and her court pardons him.

            One major aspect of tragedy I now understand that I did not before is the catharsis involved in the resolution of the tragedies. To be very honest, the term catharsis just did not make any sense to me; I was not able to identify it in any of the readings we had read so far, until now.  Catharsis is a term derived from the Ancient Greek, meaning to purge, cleanse or purify.  According to Aristotle’s Poetics “Tragedy . . . is an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude . . . ; through pity and fear effecting the proper purgation [or catharsis] of these emotions.” So, “Through catharsis, an audience watching a tragedy implicitly undergoes the same crisis and resolution of disease or uncleanliness and healing or purification” (Terms/Themes handout).  An example of this can be found in Sophocles’ Antigone where Creon, who is neither purely good nor evil, who through his well-intentioned actions brings tragedy upon himself and his family. By executing Antigone, his niece, he inspires in the audience both fear and pity for the characters who suffer as a result; his wife and son who commit suicide and Antigone herself, whose only crime has been to give her brother a decent burial, which Creon has denied him. These tragic events bring about a restoration of the social balance, creating a feeling of relief and transformational resolution to mitigate the sadness experienced by the audience. Another example of catharsis can be found in Shakespeare’s Hamlet, where the drama created by Hamlet’s inability to enact revenge for his father’s murder, and the ensuing tragic deaths of himself and many others, is released by his eventual killing of Claudius, his uncle, once again re-establishing the social order.

            Another term that I have come to understand is the term Spectacle. According to Aristotle’s Poetics “The spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry.  For the power of tragedy we may be sure, is felt even apart from representation and actors”.  In early tragedies like Agamemnon, and Oedipus the King the chorus or a messenger reported on the spectacle using very descriptive analogies, which allowed the audience to use their imagination without limits.  For example, in Agamemnon, the murder of Agamemnon is behind the curtains and is described by the chorus to the audience, and in Oedipus the King, the audience does not get to see Oedipus gouge his eyes out with the pins, and Jocasta is not shown hanging herself from the bed sheets. As Kat Henderson stated “the more gruesome of deeds happened offstage and the audience is merely told of their happening. This particular removing of spectacle allows the audience to focus more on the meaning of event, than on the events themselves” (Model Assignments).  However, as tragedy started modernizing, the spectacle stared appearing on stage, rather than hidden behind the curtains. An example of that can be seen in Shakespeare’s Hamlet where the audience gets to see the gruesome killings and dead bodies on stage, rather being told by the chorus or a messenger. So, to my understanding so far, as tragedy modernizes, there seems to be less of the chorus and more spectacle visible to the audience.

            Other terms I came to understand are the Oedipal Complex or the Electra complex.  The Oedipal Complex is derived from Oedipus the King and refers to the unusual attraction the son has for his mother.  The Electra complex is just the opposite of the Oedipal Complex, where instead of the attraction between the mother and the son, it is the attraction the daughter has for the father.  This complex is derived from O’Neil’s Mourning Becomes Electra, where Lavinia yearns to take her mother’s place as the wife of her father. The Oedipal complex is also identified in this play by the feelings and attraction Orion has for his mother Christine.

            I will conclude with Umaymah Shahid’s explanation about the necessity of learning tragedy by stating, “Tragedy teaches the audience what is truly happening in families and how the ills within this structure affect our society,” with that being said it brings us right back to Aristotle’s Poetics where he says, “Tragedy … is an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude…,” whereby tragedy imitates real life situations, which I believe makes it the greatest literary genre, because it represents the characters of both good and evil, which can be associated with just any human being. I also believe this genre shows the dark side of human nature, the side which most of us do not like to think about or bring out. Things we only think about doing in our minds, this genre shows the characters actually doing those things out in the open.