Scott Agruso The Evolution
of Spectacle in Tragedy
Spectacle is defined as “A specially
prepared or arranged display of a more or less public nature (esp. one on a
large scale), forming an impressive or interesting show or entertainment for
those viewing it” (course website). Spectacle acts as the mechanism that fuels
the enjoyment of the abundance of blockbusters and “popcorn flicks” at the movie
theater during the summer. For many people, the embellishment of spectacle, with
its explosions, futuristic sets, and computer-generated makeup is what they have
come to expect when experiencing a modern drama, and if the movie does not
deliver in this aspect, it is openly berated, mocked or tossed aside when
discussed with others. Spectacle, most notably in the portrayal of death or
injury, was not always embraced. Greek tragedies almost always repressed
spectacle, forcing bloody and other potentially audience-alienating scenes out
of the spotlight and away from view. As tragedy modernized, the repression of
spectacle lessened.
In Classical Greek tragedies, spectacle is
often repressed, although the reasons why can easily be disputed. One theory is
that the technological limitations of the time prevented showings of spectacle
from being believable. Perhaps Greek tragedians, whose plays were performed at
Dionysian festivals in front of families and common citizens, believed that gory
displays of violence would be too much for audiences to handle. Another
possibility could be that Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides chose to repress
spectacle for artistic purposes, asking audiences to rely on their own
imaginations to conceptualize the brutal violence that occurred.
For whatever reason, the choice to repress
spectacle was obviously an intentional one. In Aeschylus’s
Agamemnon, the only indication the
audience receives of Agamemnon’s death comes from an off-stage scream and his
own announcement of the “deadly blow” (1589). Shortly afterward, the lifeless
bodies of Agamemnon and Cassandra are revealed to the audience through the
opening of the palace doors. This trick of spectacle is repeated by Sophocles in
Oedipus the King when Oedipus opens
the palace doors to reveal his blindness to the audience, who had just heard the
news of both Jocasta’s death and Oedipus’s striking of his own eyes from a
messenger. Euripides, differing from the other two major Greek tragedians, used
spectacle to his advantage. During the Bacchae in the lead-up to the play’s
climax, thunder and earthquakes are used to enhance the moment and intensity of
the play. Despite this displayed understanding of spectacle as a mechanism for
his play, Euripides still chooses to repress the spectacle of Pentheus’s
dismemberment by the maenads, choosing only to describe the brutal, violent
death to the audience through the words of a messenger. In
Poetics, Aristotle states that
“spectacle has, indeed, an emotional attraction of its own, but, of all the
parts, it is the least artistic, and connected least with the art of poetry”
(6g). As evidenced by the popularity and profitability of Michael Bay’s
Transformers franchise, which
features the absence of any semblance of character growth and plot, spectacle
can absolutely act as a substitute for poetry and art. However, as shown by the
embracing of spectacle in Shakespeare’s
Hamlet, which was written nearly two thousand years after the Greek
tragedies of Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides, spectacle can work
simultaneously with poetry. Shakespeare intentionally plays with spectacle as a
way of building anticipation and making the ending’s embracing of spectacle more
impactful. The killing of King Hamlet, the bedroom, and final scenes of the play
act as perfect examples of this. King Hamlet’s death, the catalyst of the play’s
events, occurs before the play begins, and the manner in which it is “shown” is
through the words of a ghost to young Hamlet. In the bedroom scene, the
spectacle is relatively repressed when Hamlet stabs Polonius through a hanging
tapestry. Although the audience knows a murder has just occurred, the actual act
is concealed from view. The culmination of all the play’s events occurs in the
final scene of the play, and Shakespeare eliminates all traces of the repression
of spectacle through the killing of multiple characters. Even though the action
of the scene occurs rapidly, the finality of the action is more impactful as a
result of Shakespeare’s gradual freeing of the reins of spectacle throughout the
play. Even though the repression of
spectacle has lessened over time, there are instances and subjects that
spectacle has yet to fully embrace. One striking example of this is the
repression of displays of children being violently injured or killed. The scene
in which Abbie smothers her and Eben’s son in Eugene O’Neill’s
Desire Under the Elms did not feature
a dramatic display or struggle on stage, and was purposely done out of the
audience’s view. Much like Shakespeare did in
Hamlet to use spectacle as a means of
anticipation, O’Neill uses Annie’s words to slowly and methodically reveal the
misdeed she had committed. The protection of innocence in theatrical plays
continues in movies today. In “Jaws” (1975), a shark attacks a young boy in a
raft on the beach, and although blood is clearly shown, the actual act of the
shark biting is veiled by the water. In “My Girl” (1991), when the main
character is attacked by killer bees, the “death stings” occur only when the
only thing the audience sees are his glasses crashing on the ground. When the death of children actually
is shown completely, it is almost always a result of a dehumanization of the
child or the act being presented in a comedic manner. A commonly used trope in
horror movies is a possessed child standing silently across the room. Characters
in horror are often forced to brutally kill the child (who is often their own),
and rarely is an effort made to repress the spectacle of their death. Movies
like “Kick-Ass” (2010), gratuitously displays violence with and against children
as a spectacle to produce a comedic reaction from the audience, although the
children in the movie are presented as having maturity beyond their years
(removing their innocence). Even as the need to repress spectacle decreases,
innocence has remained protected against these forces. According to the course website, the
sublime is described as “beauty mixed or edged with danger, terror, threat—all
on a grand or elevated scale.” Dionysus acts as a champion of sublimity; with
his beauty also comes an uneasiness and recklessness that has the potential to
destroy an individual. The goddess, Aphrodite, also acts as a sublime figure
within the Euripidean play Hippolytos.
Both Pentheus and Hippolytus respectively recognize the dangers that exist,
whether consciously or not, by giving themselves up to the gods. Even characters
who are not gods can act as sublime figures; Oedipus is an example of this.
Whitney Evans states that “while the audience is disgusted with Oedipus’
actions, they are also considering the face that his plight was placed upon him”
(model assignments). The play’s opposing forces of respect and disgust that are
felt for Oedipus allow the audiences of tragedies to connect with its characters
on a deeper level. Spectacle’s gradual evolution has allowed tragedy to grow and become more accessible to mass audiences. According to Nietzsche in Birth of Tragedy, Euripides realized that tragedy needed something else to prevent it from dying and recognized the value in embracing spectacle in his plays, as evidenced by his use of earthquakes and thunder to raise the intensity of scenes in the Bacchae. Playwrights like Shakespeare and O’Neill, over two thousand years later, continued the evolution of spectacle, which allowed a wider variety of audiences to appreciate their plays. Today, traditional Greek tragedies that repress spectacle find themselves with only niche audiences to perform to. The majority of audiences today prefer to see plays with extravagant sets, believable special effects, and other tricks of spectacle to keep their attention.
|