Umaymah Shahid
07/07/2012
The Beauty of Tragedy
Every genre has its own appeal, and while some might be inviting others
might be quite repelling. For me, Tragedy was a genre I had to convince myself
to take a class for. Tragedy seemed
to always deal with blood, death, and grief. I could not understand why someone
would take interest in something that only caused sadness and where in the end
all the characters would die. Despite all the negative ideas I came into class
with, I have learned that Tragedy is much more than death and rivalry; it is
about human reality, man’s love and lust, and the fragility of family.
During the course of the semester I have learned that Tragedy is a
slightly exaggerated form of human behavior and reality. Tragedy teaches the
audience what is truly happening in families and how the ills within this
structure affect our society. It not only depicts reality but invites the
audience to look at human psychology which shows that humans are not black and
white but that their personality is shaped through various events. In Tragedy,
the characters are not only good and evil, but most characters are a mix of both
and though one might have more evil than good there is always an explanation of
that character’s attitude. For example, when looking at the Greek play,
Agamemnon, the audience feels a
strong sense of repulsion when Clytemnestra welcomes her husband by murdering
him. Yet through the many discussions in class, the majority understood that her
reason for killing her husband was to avenge her daughter’s sacrifice and there
was a sense of understanding even if there was no sympathy. The real world is
not like Romance where there is good and bad, yet it is a mix of the two where
one’s personality is shaped through fate and free will.
To allow the spectators to develop this sense of pity and fear of the
characters, Tragedy has also developed on the spectacle. I had believed that
spectacle was important in engaging the audience and letting them in on the
action. Spectacle in Tragedy however, has a whole new meaning. Spectacle creates
suspense and allows the spectator to use his or her imagination as to what
occurred. The suppression of spectacle is seen in all the plays that were
studied in the semester such as:
Agamemnon, Oedipus the King, Antigone, and
Hippolytus. In each play a messenger comes to the chorus or the main
character and narrates a murder, ripping of the eyes, or suicide. For example,
the audience does not see when Oedipus takes Jacosta’s buttons and gouges his
own eyes out. This is instead told by the messenger who comes to tell Creon of
Oedipus’s deeds. Aristotle states in his
Poetics that “fear and pity may
be aroused by spectacular means… for the plot ought to be so constructed that
even without the aid of the eye, he who hears the tale told will thrill with
horror and melt to pity at what takes place”
(XIV a).
Thus, the reason behind the suppression of spectacle is not to
hold back the audience from the action but to not lose them in the action. It
allows the reaction of catharsis, pity and fear, to overtake the audience
through the language and action of the messenger, not the action itself.
Tragedy is a unique genre in that it forces the audience to look at the
conflict and its consequences rather than the way the ending played out.
In genres like Romance and Comedy spectacle is not suppressed because it is
through the spectacle that the plot becomes a Romance or a Comedy. In a Romance,
if the audience was only shown the couple falling in love and then them getting
married, it would not appeal to the audience. With the audience involved in the
plot’s development (i.e. the two couples being separated and the conflict) the
plot takes up the Romantic genre. Tragedy is thus unique in its take on
Spectacle.
What was interesting to me throughout the class was the difference between
different genres despite the fact that they interweave at certain points.
Comedy, Tragedy, and Romance, each differ in their plot, setting, and character
attitude. In Romance the story goes along the lines of a problem occurring where
two people are kept apart and the story moves along a certain conflict which
keeps the couple apart until they get together again. There is a distinct
difference between good and bad, and in the end, there is usually a “happily
ever after”. In Tragedy on the other hand, there is an illness within a family
which plagues the society and the tragedy ends with the resolve to the problem
either through the silencing or banishment of the hero (White).
The audience feels fear and pity for the characters because of their humanized
conflicts and their desire for revenge (Evans ¶3). There are no good or bad
characters in Tragedy, instead each character is a mix of both and though in the
end the hero dies or is banished, the audience feels a sense of grief as well as
contentment that the hero was rid of his/her pain and was honored by others.
Tragedy elicits a feeling beyond happiness and as Nietzsche states in
The Birth of Tragedy that true
tragedy gives a “metaphysical consolation that whatever superficial changes may
occur, life is at bottom indestructibly powerful and joyful” (Nietzsche
39).Though Tragedy is very hard to swallow it is a reminder that despite all
unfortunate events life will remain on its course and will continue to thrive.
And though the hero might have died, there is peace in his/her death.
In Hamlet, though Hamlet dies in
the end, the audience feels a sense of peace that the King died, Hamlet died
knowing that his father’s murder was avenged, and Fortinbras honored Hamlet for
his heroism.
Tragedy is especially striking because when studying it, one comes to see
that it is not all blood and gore. Though there are some very disturbing scenes,
such as Oedipus stabbing himself blind, tragedy is about the conflict, the
solution, and the method of finding the solution (without much spectacle) which
usually ends in the hero’s life ending. Throughout this class thus far we have
discussed the different aspects of tragedy and how though it is a very sad and
gruesome genre, there is a lot more to tragedy than what many people come to
know it as.
Works Cited
Evans, Allison. “Shades of Grey.” Final Samples. 2010. Web. 6 July, 2012.
http://coursesite.uhcl.edu/HSH/Whitec/LITR/4533/models/2010/f2010/f10Bking.htm
Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Birth of
Tragedy. England: Penguin Classics, 1993. Print.
White, Craig. “Aristotle’s Poetics.”
Online posting. N.d. Course webpage Tragedy. University of Houston-Clear Lake.
Web. 6 July 2012.
---. “Terms/ Themes: Tragedy.” Online posting. N.d. Course home page. University
of Houston Clear Lake. Web. 6 July 2012.
|