Katie
Morin
11/4/2016
Mexican Americans: Immigrants, Minority, or Both?
In trying to better understand the differences and similarities of New
World immigrants when in comparison to minorities, I found reading about the
narratives of Mexican Americans to be most helpful. Although I do not identify
as a Mexican American, I believe this topic is interesting given our close
proximity to the Mexican-American border, and also the sheer amount of Mexican
Americans whom I have had the pleasure of knowing over the years. I found the
essays written by Cassandra Rea (2013), Alexandra Alvarado (2013), and Adam
Glasgow (2013) to adequately describe the struggles faced by Mexican Americans,
and their overlap of immigrant and minority characteristics.
In her essay, “America’s Neighbor: New World Immigrants,” Cassandra Rea
equates Mexican Americans to being a minority because of their close proximity
to their home country. She writes that because the only thing that separates
Mexico from America is an “imaginary line,” “this makes it difficult for this
culture as well as the others to commit to the American nationality of the
dominant culture and the struggle of wanting to stay loyal to their home
country.” She goes on to state that because America neighbors Mexico, Mexican
Americans’ loyalties might be tested, therefore contributing to their resistance
to assimilation. This reluctance to accept America’s dominant culture is a
characteristic typically seen in minority groups.
In contrast, Alexandra Alvarado identifies the similarities between the
narratives of Mexican Americans and those belonging to the traditional Old World
immigrant. In her research report’s start, entitled “Betrayal or Opportunity?”
Alvarado depicts the ways in which Mexican American immigrants are more likely
to accept the dominant culture in better hopes of achieving the “American
Dream.” She primarily discusses education, and as discussed in class, the desire
to pursue higher education is something generally seen among immigrants. She
also states that returning to Mexico is no longer “an option” among
second-generation Mexican Americans, as their quality of life would surely
decrease upon arriving in their parents’ home country. This stands in stark
contrast to Rea’s essay which states that Mexican American immigrants are less
likely to assimilate because of their close proximity to their homeland, which
allows them to travel back and forth freely and encourages Mexican Americans to
remain true to their heritage.
Finally, Adam Glasgow’s essay, “Are New World Immigrants Minority Groups,
too?” combines the two previous essays, explaining the ways in which Mexican
Americans are both a minority group as well as immigrants. Like Rea, Glasgow
claims that Mexico’s nearness to the American border helps to keep Mexican
Americans more in touch with their heritage as Mexicans. They are able to travel
across the border easily, therefore allowing them the opportunity to actively
engage in certain aspects of their culture on a frequent basis. However, he also
states that the examples of Mexican Americans he provides have accepted parts of
the dominant culture, and have no problem recognizing their appreciation for
America. Glasgow writes: “In this way, they are both immigrants in that they've
come to the US for opportunity and have in many ways assimilated, and
minorities, in that they desire to hold onto their native culture.” I liked that
he combined aspects of both the immigrant and minority narratives in order to
describe the experiences faced by Mexican Americans as New World immigrants.
Although he does not mention the term explicitly, I believe he is describing the
New World immigrant’s likelihood to experience acculturation rather than full
assimilation.
I truly enjoyed all three essays, because each one offered a different
perspective of the Mexican American narrative. I believe there is such debate
over whether or not New World immigrants are more or less minority than
immigrant because these narratives are truly relative to not only the person
experiencing these situations firsthand, but also to the readers who are free to
interpret them as they choose. Because of this, I believe Adam Glasgow’s essay
is the most effective of the three because it does not try to fit the Mexican
American’s narrative into a box, but rather recognizes the fact that it is a
combination of both immigrant and minority narratives.
|