|
|
|
Chandler Barton
Deutschland Uber Alles; At Least, until it isn’t; A Brief Glimpse at the
History of German-Americans and Their Relationship to Modern Immigrant Groups
The
history of immigration of Germans to the United States is one marred with mixed
emotions and convoluted perceptions. Although Germans were one of the first
large group of non-Anglo[1]
peoples to immigrate en-masse to America, they are less often remembered for
their positive contributions—their efforts in aiding the abolitionist movement,
for example—and more so for their perceived connections to the “evil empires” of
Kaiser Wilhelm and Adolf Hitler’s Third Reich; though, even prior to World War
I, German immigrants have been viewed with deep suspicion and disregard due to
their lingual and cultural distinctions from the American dominant WASP culture.
What therefore are the German-Americans, and how do they fit into the immigrant
story of America; and why did they decide to discard their homelands to come
into a land of open hostility, and ironically end up as one of the largest
ethnic components of the American dominant culture?
For
starters, German-Americans make up the largest single group of immigrants from
Europe in comparison to any other[2],
even before Scotch-Irish and English. In contemporary terms, it places “German”
as the largest identifier of European-American heritage in the country. The
immigration to America starting in the late 1600’s to Pennsylvania and Texas
helped establish these states as well-known habitats of German peoples living in
America. German culture and cuisine were soon to spread and seep into American
culture, producing such modern food novelties as the hamburger and hotdog. Even
into the late 1800 and early 1900’s, German was considered one of the foremost
minority languages spoken by a sizable amount of the population.
[3]
Despite this “minority monopoly” that Germans enjoyed—and continue to enjoy as
the majority heritage of the contemporary White population of the United
States—the early immigration of the Germans to America in the 19th
and 20th century was marred with difficulty. The primary causes of
this rocky transition was the language differences between German and English,
(despite both being Germanic based languages,) and cultural ones, as America had
developed largely out of a Scotch-Irish and English (WASP) tradition as opposed
to a German one. Even though Germans and the English are both European peoples,
Both Germanics one at that, the cultural divides, as well as historical
conflicts and divisions between the German state, Britain, and France, seemed to
have set a notable distaste of the “Dutchman”[4]
in the New world.
The
language barrier between the German immigrant and naturalized WASP American
provides the first natural barrier between assimilation and acceptance. Though
the origins of the German people and Anglo-Saxons are of common stock, the
Angles and Saxons originating in the Jutland of Denmark and East Germany
respectively, the divergence between them linguistically over the centuries, as
well as culturally (which will be examined momentarily) offer a difficult
conundrum to navigate, especially given the inherent xenophobic tendencies of
Americans that they associate first and foremost with foreign tongues. Despite
the common perception in the 21st century of American xenophobia
being associated historically largely with race, as far back as Benjamin
Franklin’s time[5]
one can easily ascertain that language—not skin color—was the primary motivator
for mistrust of the immigrant, which also resulted in similar treatment for
Irish and Italian folk[6].
From
a cultural (and inevitably, historical) perspective, the modern German people
have a distinct, noticeable break from their Anglo-Saxon brethren dating back to
the migration of the Angles and Saxons of mainland Europe to the British Isles
in the 5th century. Though both groups—though it should be noted that
the modern definition of “German” includes a multitude of different tribes,
clans, and nations such as the Austrians, Bavarians, Prussians, Swiss, Swabians,
etc—have common origins in the Germanic migration[7]
and settlement of “Germania”[8]
in Europe, it was at the genesis of the two groups’ forming identities as
Europeans that saw their breaking apart, and as such, allowed a large degree of
divergence in way of their identities as distinct peoples. Whereas the
Anglo-Saxons settled the British Isles and were in turn influenced by native
Celts, Romans, Vikings, Danes, and eventually French (thanks to the Norman
Conquest), the Germanic tribes remaining in mainland Europe were left almost
entirely unharrassed by outside influences, holding the rather notorious honor
of being one of the only unscathed, unconquered European peoples by the Roman
Empire, which failed at length to ever produce a successful, substantial
campaign of conquest or expedition into the Germanic homeland of Central Europe.
This
early historical context is paramount in order to understand how these two
groups of people, so similar in origin and ethnicity, ended up on opposite ends
of cultural and political perspectives. The divergence of language and culture
having begun in the early 5th-6th century as noted was
merely the beginning stage; the English and the Germans would continue to grow
apart as the centuries progressed. The alignment of Germany and Austria-Hungary
towards Central European ambitions and expansion in the early 20th
century, which was directly in conflict with the interests of Great Britain and
the United States, lead to the First Worl War, one of the last and final events
that officialized the break between the civilized Englishman with the barbarous
“Hun”[9].
The
hostility that arose during the eras of the World Wars only served to reinforce
the prejudices and biases that Americans had of their German immigrant
neighbors. It was bad enough that they were a people arriving with a different
language and culture, but it was even worse that their home country would end up
engaged in the two largest conflicts the modern world had ever seen with their
new country. Xenophobic tendencies and discrimination of Germans simply as
“immigrants”, a plight they shared with many others, would eventually evolve and
morph into open hostility and suspicion during the era of both World Wars, where
Germany was a combatant at the opposite end of the WASP world.
The
earliest wave of Germans that arrived to America, around the 17th and
18th centuries, included religious groups such as the Pennsylvania
“Dutch”[10],
Anabaptists, Amish, and Mennonites. Though they largely remained outside the
purview of official harassment and stuck largely to themselves (and still do in
many ways to the present day) they still received their fair share of scrutiny
and outside criticism due to their religious way of life and beliefs, as well as
their use of the German language. The non-religious wave of German immigrants
during this time was confined largely to Hessian mercenaries hired by George III
to fight in the revolutionary war. The next wave of German settlers included
exiles, outcasts, dissidents, and veterans of the 1848 revolution in Germany.
This group was the first to receive major push-back from such entities as the
American Party and other nativist groups who opposed non-WASP immigration into
the United States. The final wave consisted of refugees, Jews, and other Germans
fleeing the economic and social conditions of the World Wars. Again, these
settlers were received with hostility, more so than their 17th and 19th
century counterparts due to anti-German sentiment during the World Wars.
Though the conditions in the United States and the attitude of the public
towards Germans ranged from apathetic and unnoticed at best, to accusations of
treason and malfeasance at its worst, Germans continued to pour into America at
fixed intervals and waves, and even would end up as the largest component of the
dominant American culture. The great conundrum is how Germans and
German-Americans today wound up at this point despite all of the historical
adversities, differences with WASP culture and language, push-back from
nativists and ill-feeling. One possible explanation is the “quiet” assimilation
of the German people into dominant American culture; as a general rule, it was
the tendency of German immigrants to form enclave communities and stick mostly
to themselves, but in many cases integrating and accepting assimilation through
the generations as opposed to fighting back against it. The only real noticeable
exception here are such religious communities as the Amish, but even their
separation remains shaky and questionable today, and most people if asked would
probably regard the Amish as American as apple pie.
A
final conjecture has to do with language and culture. Although it was readily
established that the English and Germans broke apart at a very early age and saw
both groups’ language and culture develop separately, their shared origins do
not have the same substantial divide as say a Chinese or even an Italian would
have, both of whom speak different languages—one of a different Indo-European
language group and the other a completely different family altogether—but also
have radically different cultures, religions, and so forth. The German therefore
had the natural advantage of adopting and meshing into a language that was not
too far off for them to pick up, and a culture that was not entirely foreign or
incomprehensible. As such, within a single generation, the typical German was
almost entirely “Americanized” given this short distance of assimilation,
removing the primary barrier of discrimination: language and culture. The only
remaining component that would linger around (albeit briefly) would be the
historical apprehension between the WASP world and the Germans, which would
itself become a thing of the past after World War II, as yet another generation
would pass on and a further degree of assimilation would eradicate any perceived
notion of an “us” vs. “them,” as the German-American became firmly rooted in
American dominate culture society.
The
most interesting and educational part of this tale has to be the radical shift
in how the German people would leap from a hated “foreigner” to an integral, key
component of the dominant culture. There is also some parallels to consider
between the story of the German-American and the rise of the Hispanic identity
and population in the United States, which itself seems capable of repeating the
pattern of the Germans: arriving in high numbers, clumping together in enclaves,
being feared and ostracized by “nativists”; yet, through only a few generations
of adaptation and assimilation, to become a key, integral part of American
dominant culture and identity. This “German Model” of immigration and
assimilation can already be seen in the Hispanic population of the United States
through the introduction, fusion, and adaptation of Hispanic cuisine, music, and
other pop-culture components; increasing social mobility, political
participation and representation; high levels of inter-marriage, as well as the
increasing trend of second and third generation Hispanics to self-identify as
White and with “White”/WASP culture.
If
the trend continues on par with that of the German-American of before, this
repeat of “dominant culture absorption” could very well be a possibility in the
Hispanic community of America. For this reason, examining the history and result
of mass waves of migration and settlement of immigrant groups, especially large
and peculiar ones as the Germans, should be considered a helpful resource when
considering the immigration and assimilation of other contemporary immigrant
groups.
Works
Cited
Bauman, Mark K. “On German American and American Jewish History.”
Journal of American Ethnic History.
Vol. 29, No. 1. 2009.
Franklin, Benjamin. Observations
Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, etc. 1755.
archive.org/stream/increasemankind00franrich/increasemankind00franrich_djvu.txt
"German Immigration." U.S. Immigration and Migration Reference Library, edited
by Lawrence W. Baker, et al., vol. 1: Vol. 1: Almanac, UXL, 2004, pp. 221-246.
U.S. History in Context,
link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/CX3436800018/UHIC?u=gray02935&xid=efaf4636.
“German Immigrants.” Immigration to
United States,
http://immigrationtounitedstates.org/519-german-immigrants.html
Halsall, Guy. Barbarian Migrations and
the Roman West. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Härke, Heinrich. "Anglo-Saxon Immigration and Ethnogenesis." Medieval
Archaeology 55.1, 2011.
Higham, Nicholas J., and Martin J. Ryan.
The Anglo-Saxon World. Yale University Press, 2013.
Koster, John. "Hating The ‘Hun’ At Home." American History,
vol. 51, no. 3. MasterFILE
Premier.
Schutz, H. "Friedrich Gerstacker's Image of the German Immigrant in America."
Journal of German-American Studies, vol 5, pg. 98-116. MLA International
Bibliography, 1972.
Ueberhorst, H. "Turnvereine and The Experience of German Immigrants In America."
In Proceedings - Annual Convention, 3d, North American Society for Sport
History.
1975.
Weber, Peter C. "Ethnic Identity During War: The Case of German American
Societies During World War I." Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly
43.1, 185-206. 2014.
Wilbers, Christian. "Saxon? German? American? Negotiating Germanness and
Belonging in The United States, 1935-1939." German Studies Review 39.1
(2016): 82-110. America: History & Life.
[1] White
Anglo-Saxon Protestants, specifically; that is Scotch-Irish, English,
etc. Hereafter referred to as “WASP”, though it should be stressed that
Scotch-Irish are of a Gaelic/Gaullist stock, but tend to identify with
Anglican religion and culture and as such fall (somewhat) into this
category.
[2] United
States Census Bureau (aggregated via infoplease.com):
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0762137.html
[3] Which,
as a result, caused some degree of gelastic hysteria. See such articles
as
http://blog.newspapers.library.in.gov/dachshunds-and-deutsch-banning-german-in-indiana-in-1919/
[4] A
common misnomer and slur used for German immigrants despite the fact
that the Dutch have existed, linguistically and culturally, independent
of German-centric diaspora for centuries. This term may also arise from
the misunderstanding and blurring of the terms “Deutsch” and “Dutch”,
the former being the name for the German people in their own language,
and the latter used to describe a person from the historical land of the
Kingdom of Holland and the Netherlands, whose culture and language,
while similar in Germanic origins, remains distinct and discrete from
their southern European neighbors.
[5] See
referenced work, Observations
Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, etc, for
an example of 17th-18th century conceptions of
immigrant peoples to the New World.
[6] It must
be noted that religion probably had a more prominent role to play with
these groups, as the Irish and Italians are vehemently and
overwhelmingly Catholic, whereas Germans tend to stray a bit more
towards Lutheran Protestantism.
[7] The “Völkerwanderung.”
See relevant entries in Britannica and Collin’s for a more precise
definition.
[8]
Historic designation for the land in Northwest/Central Europe
encompassing the original settlement of the German migrants between the
Rhine and Danube rivers. Coined most prominently by Julius Caesar and
Tacitus in their histories describing the Roman Empire’s attempt to
subjugate the “barbarian Germani” tribes of the area.
[9] See
John Koster’s "Hating the ‘Hun’ At Home" article. “Hun” was pejoratively
applied to Germans during the WWI era as a way to dehumanize them by
drawing parallels with Attila the Hun and his savagery. Though in
fairness, the Germans applied to term to themselves on more than one
occasion and might have brought it upon themselves; see Emperor
William’s “Hun speech”:
http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=755
[10] See
note 4.
|