Adam Glasgow
Immigrant and Minority Literature: What's the Difference
and Why Does it Matter? To the average person the terms "immigrant" and "minority"
are more or less interchangeable. In many ways, this confusion makes sense.
Quite a bit overlaps between the two groups. However, stark differences between
the two do exist that are important to understand, especially if one wishes to
read and comprehend the literature written by members of the two distinct
groups. The most obvious similarity between the two groups is that
they are, at least to some extent, separated from the dominant culture. In
America that basically amounts to either being non-white, non-Christian, or a
combination of the two. Both types of literature document the difficulties that
this status came bring with it, including feelings of aloneness, monetary
shortcomings, etc. They can also both explore the positives that come along with
being a minority or an immigrant, such as pride for their unique endeavors, or
the benefits of their specific culture, like a heightened importance on family. Take, for example, Anzia Yezierska's "Soap and Water." This
is a story of an immigrant woman who is working hard to make her way in America.
She attends school and hopes to get her degree, but was refused it by a woman
named Miss Whiteside because the main character is dirty and unkempt. The reader
comes to find out that this is the case because of the outrageous amount of work
she has to do to make ends meet while going to school. She speaks of the
"tyranny of their [American] culture," (WEB) highlighting the fact that although
she is attempting to assimilate into the dominant culture, she still feels
separate from it. Compare this to Toni Cade Bambara's "The Lesson," a work of
minority literature about a young black girl in a poor part of town. In the
story an older woman named Miss Moore takes the girl and her friends to an
upscale toy store in order to illustrate the harsh divide between the wealth of
the dominant culture and the world the children are familiar with. One of the
children in the story says, "Imagine for a minute what kind of society it is in
which some people can spend on a toy what it would cost to feed a family of six
or seven." Another one of the children simply quips, "White folks crazy" (151).
Once again the reader can see one of the similarities between the two types of
literature; they both talk about the difficulties of living in a group separate
from the mainstream. This brings us to the big, vital difference between the two
groups of people. Immigrants, on the whole, desire greatly to assimilate to the
dominant culture, while minority groups do not. In her essay titled "Most
Americans..." past student Debbie describes the desire to adapt very well when
describing her own ancestors, "Typical of the immigrant narrative, my
great-grandparents gave up their language, culture, and even changed the
pronunciation of their name so that they could assimilate into the dominant
culture" (WEB). In contrast, minorities have a much stronger craving to hold
onto their traditional culture's ways and are not as interested in working
towards the "American Dream." That isn't to say that immigrants always abandon
the entirety of their native culture, but they do tend to be far more willing to
give it up in order to be considered an American. In Gish Jen's "In the American Society," the reader meets a
family of Chinese immigrants. The father has a huge amount of respect for
American ideals and aspires to be like the Americans he idolizes. At the
beginning of the story the reader learns that he has started saving for his
children's college educations early by starting a pancake house because, "Those
Americans always saying it [...] Smart guys think in advance" (158). His wife is
also eager to assimilate, as evidenced by her desire to join a local country
club. Opposite this would be those around Miss Moore in Bambara's "The Lesson."
The children are annoyed by her presence, but even the adults seem to look down
on her for not matching to the norms of their minority group, like going to
church (145). The difference of motivation for both types of literature has
a large influence on the general tone of the works. While immigrant literature
obviously does often tell of the troubles of assimilation, it generally does
remain upbeat and hopeful. After all, immigrants are working towards something:
the allusive but irresistible (to them) "American Dream" of climbing the social
ladder and bettering oneself. In Nicholasa Mohr's short story "The English
Lesson," the main character (and many of the characters around her), have a
driving passion to learn the native language in order to become a more
integrated part of American society. Alice Walker's "Elethia," on the other
hand, contains characters who are much more bitter about the dominant culture
that surrounds them. Unlike most immigrant literature, it does not leave the
reader with a sense that the characters are filled with optimism about the
future. This all brings up an interesting question: can a work of
literature be both a piece of immigrant literature
and minority literature? The most
compelling piece of work we have read this semester that suggests that it is
possible is the slave narrative, "The Interesting Narrative of the Life of
Olaudah Equiana." The story begins with Olaudah being kidnapped from Africa and
sold into slavery in the American south. At this point, the story is 100% a
piece of minority literature. He is not a willing immigrant, and he is not
interested in adapting to the dominant culture. For example, he was given a new
name - Gustavus - but he refused
to answer to it until he was beaten into submission (WEB ch. 3 par. 7).
However, this does slowly change over the course of the novel. He learns to read
and eventually earns his freedom by saving up money through selling and trading
of goods. Once he earns his freedom, though, he does not seem to desire to go
back to Africa. He has assimilated. While immigrants and minority groups do share some
similarities, there is a thick line that divides them. That line is a desire to
assimilate into the dominant culture. Even though that is a major distinction
between the two groups, public perception is frequently confused on the subject.
That confusion isn't helped by misleading terminology like "model minority
groups" (which are actually immigrant groups), so the confusion is somewhat
understandable. If we are to read and understand literature from these groups,
however, we must understand the
difference between them.
|