Cassandra Rea
9th
December 2013 Evolving Through Time: The American
Immigrant Throughout time, America has become the promised land, the
land of opportunity for many immigrants who desire to come to this land. Even
from the very beginning, English Immigrant settlers as well as others after them
have shown the yearning to achieve something more, to be free of their native
land and becoming something new. It was the American Dream before it was titled
the American Dream, in the sense that it offered the picturesque idea of
painting the dreamlike picture of being free of rules with the allowance of
achieving better than before. It is with this notion that has shaped the
standard immigrant story of the idea of the American Dream to the earliest of
settlers including the pilgrims and has continued to stay constant throughout
time because America offered something new that no other country could offer,
which was the opportunity to achieve greatness. Yet despite being such an
appealing indication, there is also the minority group that does indeed go
against the grain. All in all however, each type of immigrant as well as the
minority all show an insight to a very fascinating story that are just pieces of
the puzzle to the immigrant narrative. The dominant culture derives from the early English settlers
known as the pilgrims and the founding fathers. They too shared the dream of
starting new life within the Americas based on their religion. According to
Rhonda Fisher, she explains how the pilgrims differ from others because they
“immigrated as a colony which sets them apart from any other category of
American immigrants and seems to be the sole reason they successfully establish
that dominant culture to which later immigrants would assimilate.” (Fisher 2007)
They ultimately traveled as a congregation because they wanted to keep their
religious values and customs intact without the worry of their future children
being influenced upon by others. Just like Fisher emphasized, the Puritans quite
heavily regarded themselves as a community rather than individuals, “if one
member suffers, all suffer with it” (Winthrop 10). This also explains how the
Puritans are the early examples of the dominant culture because they had no
intention of assimilating to the natives (Native Americans) present within
America but rather they stayed firm to their beliefs and practices. Even though
the Puritans had all the faith and good intentions to lead them into the
promised land, they eventually found that the land of opportunity offered that
and eventually the Puritans would become more individualistic rather than
staying together as a community. Once settled and established, the Puritans actively sought
personal gain rather than for the community, which would lead them to leave the
original immigrant community that they so clung to behind. William Bradford
recounts these chains of events in Of Plymouth Plantation,
he stated that “so much that they removed, as for the enriching of
themselves…they had given away already the best and most commodious places to
other, and now wanted themselves” (Bradford (33.7-33.8), he describes how the
Puritans no longer choose to put the church community first but rather
themselves. With the Puritans branching off like this sets up the stage for the
creation of the Founding Fathers. Once the Founding Fathers established the
Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, America became its own country
with the melting pot of much different type of Europeans becoming one nation who
will become the dominant culture. Hector St. Jean de Crevecoeur observes this
transformation of the melting pot which is becoming the dominant culture right
before his eyes, “the strange mixture of blood, which you will find in no other
country…he is an American, leaving behind all prejudices and manners, receives
new ones from the new mode of life he has embraced, the new government he obeys,
and the new rank he holds” (Crevecoeur 3.7). The idea of the melting pot is
quite clear in his statements because these individuals are intermarrying and no
longer sticking to their culture. Besides the Puritans and
the Founding Fathers, there is another group that also ties into the realm of
the dominant culture which is the Scots-Irish. The Scots-Irish are under the
same umbrella as the dominant culture bit are perceived very differently such as
being labeled where as the dominant culture is not and likes to stay plain. They
too immigrate to America “for economic opportunity plus or minus religious
freedom, human rights” (Scots-Irish Immigration), unlike the Puritans, they did
not travel with a community but rather by families and individuals. They did not
necessarily have to assimilate when migrating because they already knew English.
They are labeled different in the sense that they are considered the part of the
population that is uneducated or hillbilly folk. This is due to their rustic
nature of living out in the woods which came from them having to migrate further
west on request of the east coast elite. It is because of the east coast elite
that the Scots-Irish have distanced themselves from the dominant culture and can
be seen as a minority group because their behavior and past history. However,
the Scots-Irish do in fact make up a good part of the country and whether either
side likes it or not, they do indeed fall under the dominant culture based on
their ethnicity and not having to assimilate because they were already used to
what was going on. The Puritans have set the ground work for the founding
fathers as well as the Scots-Irish to build and establish them as the dominant
culture due to intermarriage and the early stages of America’s melting pot
amongst these European descendants. Despite emerging into the dominant culture,
they too have also shown the early signs of the standard immigrant narrative by
stating their desires to be free of religious persecution as well as economic
opportunities.
The immigrant narrative does not just apply to a specific culture or race but it
is a story or narrative that associates with traveling the New World and trying
to accomplish the American Dream. It tells the journey of the individual
escaping the Old World and traveling to the New World with intentions to
assimilate to the dominant culture. The perfect example of the standard
immigrant story comes from Anzia Yezierska with “Soap and Water”, as a young
adult, she goes through the hardships of reaching the American Dream at all
costs even with the dominant culture labeling her. Throughout her narrative, she
expresses the struggle of trying to assimilate to the dominant culture, “at last
I came to college…I rushed for it with the outstretched arms of youth’s aching
hunger to give and take of life’s deepest and highest, and I came against the
solid wall of the well-fed, well-dressed world—the frigid whitewashed wall of
cleanliness” (Yezierska 17). Despite her eagerness to assimilate within the New
World by going to college, assimilating to the dominant culture and the
portrayal that it presents deems rather difficult for her. But just like any
standard immigrant narrative, her faith in the American Dream is restored with
hope at the end of the narrative, “I was changed and the world was changed…
My past was the
forgotten night. Sunrise was all around me…America! I found America” ((Yezierska
36-39). Despite going through hard times, she has risen above and found her
American Dream that she had been hoping and dreaming for all along. Despite her
standard immigrant story, there are other pieces to the immigrant narrative that
continue on beyond just the standard. Another type of immigrant narrative deals
with the New World Immigrant. The New World Immigrant
is labeled differently from other immigrants based on the fact of location; they
are in the same hemisphere as the new world (western) whereas other immigrants
migrate from the eastern hemisphere. The New World Immigrant includes
individuals such as Hispanics from Central America and Afro-Caribbean’s from
countries such as Haiti and Jamaica. Because they are so close to the New World,
the New World Immigrant is responsible for the largest wave of contemporary
immigration. Their story differs from the standard immigrant narrative because
there is struggle with assimilating to the dominant culture and staying true to
their Old World ways or culture as well as the vulnerability of experiencing
exploitation of previous experiences with America. It can be seen as a mixture
of an immigrant narrative and a minority narrative (forced to immigrate,
resisted assimilation, the American Nightmare). An example of the New World
Immigrant comes from Junot Diaz’s “How to Date a Browngirl…” he tells a story of
how to date different types of girls from whites, to brown girls, and even of
mixed origin. He explains in the narrative the type of girl that he should
marry, ““white ones are the one you want the most” (IA 277), here not only does
he have the attraction to the dominant culture but also the idea of
intermarriage hence wanting to assimilate to the dominant culture; which relates
to the immigrant narrative. But he also makes the connection of previous of
exploitation made by America, “tell her that your mom’s knew right away what it
was, that she recognized its smell from the year the United States invaded your
island” (IA 277). This in particular refers to U. S. military intervention of
the Civil War in the Dominican Republic in 1965. This in particular shows the
indecisiveness in America and the yearning to assimilate is on the fence due to
past experiences. The final group that fits into the immigrant narrative is the
complete opposite of the New World Immigrant, which is the model minorities. Unlike true minorities
who are not immigrants because they were forced to come to the New World
(African Americans) or were already present (Native Americans), the model
minority is a term used for the “ideal immigrant”. It is one who assimilates to
the Dominant Culture as well as exceeding the dominant culture values such as
socioeconomic progress, hard work, commitment to education, and extended family
stability. Specific cultures that are considered model minorities include Jewish
Americans and Asian Americans. They are ideal in the sense that they take
advantage of every opportunity that the New World has to offer such as
education. An example narrative of the model minority is
Gish Jen’s, In the American Society,
her father came to the country and took over a pancake house in which he
became very successful. He was successful enough that her father had already had
money put back for college for his two daughters. In this part of the narrative,
this shows the drive and determination and going beyond the minimum to be
prosperous. With having money, their mother wanted to assimilate by joining the
local country club. She wanted the need to fit in with the dominant culture and
used all her resources to try but failed. This narrative has all the right
functions of the model minority because it shows the determination to succeed as
well as the desire to assimilate to the dominant culture. Just like the New
World Immigrant, the Model Minority fits into its own sub category amount the
immigrant narrative because of the unique attributes it presents within the
narrative.
Despite their being three different types of the immigrant narrative, there is
the minority narrative which does not fall into an immigrant narrative because
minorities did not choose the American Dream, they were already native to the
land before the dominant culture (Native Americans) or they were forced to the
New World (slaves). The minority narrative offers a different perspective
towards the dominant culture as being fowl or vicious with no sense of hope,
instead of the American Dream, they refer it to the American Nightmare. This is
documented in Olaudah Equiano’s narrative in which he stated that he “constantly
grieved…wishing for death rather than anything else.” (CH. 3 Par. 2), his life
in slavery was so horrid that he longed for death so he could escape the fate of
being a slave forever. Rather than choosing to assimilate like immigrants, he
felt that death was a better sentence than assimilation. It is with minorities
like this that share an inside look into the involuntary contact, exploitation,
and resisting assimilation that shows how these cultures view differ from
immigrants; they do not paint the picture so lightly towards the dominant
culture.
America
is perceived by many immigrants as the land of opportunity. Even with the rise
of the dominant culture coming from the Puritans and the Founding Fathers, they
all share one thing in common, the immigrant narrative. Despite evolving into
the dominant culture, the Puritans and the Founding Fathers documented their
reasoning to leave the Old World in pursuit for the opportunities in the New
World. They rose to become the dominant culture because upon landing in the New
World, they had no intentions of assimilating to the Native Americans. Instead,
they formed their own culture with other Europeans traveling fast; the melting
pot began to simmer with intermarriage of these different Europeans to
eventually form the dominant culture of America. Throughout time the dominant
culture has advertised the optimistic life and opportunities the New World had
to offer but with a price. The need to assimilate to the dominant culture is
very crucial to how the immigrant is labeled and even their opportunities.
Despite coming from different parts of the world, there are three different
types of immigrant’s narratives that offer a sliver to the immigrant narrative
as a whole; Old World Immigrants (Eastern), New World Immigrants (Western), and
the Model Minority. They each play their unique role in the immigrant narrative
because of their perception and acknowledgement to the dominant culture. The Old
World Immigrants struggle but keep pushing to assimilate, the New World
Immigrant is torn between assimilation and loyalties, and the Model Minority
dives in head first superseding expectations. With these three different types
of stories, they help mold and shape the immigrant narrative that gives the
reader a glimpse into how the dominant culture began, what it is today, and how
immigration is perceived throughout time. All in all these narratives help mold
America into the country it has become due to the fact that they are part of
history, from real individuals dating all the way back to the Puritans before
becoming the dominant culture people know today.
|