|
LITR 5731: Seminar in American
Multicultural Literature (Immigrant) Tuesday, 17 June 2008: American Indian Minority vs. the immigrant narrative. Poem: Chrystos, “I Have Not Signed a Treaty with the United States Government,” UA 304 Poetry reader: Matt Richards Poetry Reading for the Poem “I Have Not Signed a Treaty with the United States Government By Matt Richards
nor has my father nor his father nor any grandmothers We don’t recognize these names on old sorry paper. Therefore we declare the United States a crazy person nightmare lousy food ugly clothes bad meat nobody we know
No one wants to go there. This US is theory illusion terrible ceremony The United States can’t dance can’t cook has no children no elders no relatives They build funny houses no one lives in but Everything the United States does to everybody is bad No this US is not a good idea We declare you terminated You’ve had your fun now go home we’re tired We signed no treaty WHAT are you still doing here Go somewhere else and
build a McDonald’s We’re going to tear all this ugly mess down now We revoke your papers your soap suds your stories are no good your colors hurt our feet our eyes are sore our bellies are tied in sour knots Go Away Now You must be some ghost in the wrong place wrong time Pack up your toys garbage lies We who are alive now Have signed no treaties Burn down your stuck houses you’re sitting in a nowhere gray glow Your spell is dead Go so far away we won’t remember you ever came here Take these words back with you
This poem connects with three of our class objectives
The first one is Objective 1d. It says “to measure multicultural differences between immigrant, minority, and dominant cultures.” Clearly this poem is a way for the Native American minority group to show the dominant culture or white man exactly what they think of them and the oppressive culture. The Native Americans didn’t choose to come to America. They were already here when America was being settled by the settlers from Europe. I believe that the main purpose for this poem is to show Americans that their minority group didn’t want to have their lands taken and ways changed. They didn’t want a new way of life and they are not the ones who signed the treaty. For this group, the American Dream that rings true for immigrants became their American Nightmare as Dr. White put it in our syllabus.
The second Objective that is present in this poem is Objective 3 “to compare and contrast the immigrant narrative with the minority narrative—or American Dream versus the American Nightmare” For example, “Minorities did not freely choose the American Dream and may speak of exploitation instead of opportunity” For example, the poem is full of anger and in several places it attacks the American way of life because of its oppressive force and what it did to their culture. They did not choose this, they were force so it is only natural that Native Americans will be angry and hostile to America and its way of life.
The final objective that this poem contains is Objective 4. “To identify the Unites States’ dominant culture to which immigrants assimilate.” There are several places in the poem that reference the dominant culture such as, McDonalds, or the treaty that their ancestors supposedly signed, and the gray glow of TV. The only major difference is again the Native Americans are not immigrants, they were here before we were. Analysis of the poem Most of the poem is about a fed up Native American community that refuses to accept the oppression of the dominant American culture. Chrystos, the poet who wrote this poem, is using this to show the US that Native Americans are not happy with this forced way of life. They are not willing to acknowledge the treaties of old because they were not there. The poet turns it around on the Americans by treating them like the invaders of their country. It is clear that they don’t want the American Dream because for them it is an American Nightmare. Questions 1. Because this exploitation of Native Americans happened so long ago, is it fair for this minority group to be so openly hostile to today’s Americans who had nothing to do with what happened in the past?
2. Should Americans try to right the wrongs that were done to the Native Americans? If so, what can we do to make it up to them? Are we responsible for fixing this injustice?
|