| 
 Justin Murphy 
Native American Literature: The Voice to a Voiceless Group 
As I 
entered into American Minority Literature, I didn’t quite know what to expect in 
terms of Native American literature. When I think of minorities, I think of 
Native Americans first and foremost: they were here first. I remember thinking 
to myself “I wonder what Native American literature is going to say? Is it going 
to be passive aggressive, or what will the tone sound like?” These two questions 
were answered in a big way. Marginalization classifies the minority experience. 
Native American literature is minority literature because their writings show 
how they are voiceless and choiceless, and how their story is one of loss. They 
show this through allusions and detournement.  
         
Native Americans fit perfectly into the minority identity because of the 
fact that they are voiceless and choiceless. Thinking back on American History, 
I remember learning about the Trail of Tears and the forced removal of native 
peoples from their land. I remember learning about Manifest Destiny and 
immediately wondering what happened to Native Americans during this time. I even 
remember learning about the reservation revolts, and how they were shut down in 
a matter of days because the United States was way overpowering. I don’t 
remember learning about the Iroquois Creation Stories, however. The Iroquois 
Creation Stories are amazing in their use of language and imagery. When reading 
them, the reader can immediately envision the story unfolding before their very 
eyes. The entire third paragraph of the second creation story shows this 
imagery. The “dirt caved in and some say the tree fell down” and the woman 
“grabbed some seeds from the Tree of Life as she fell.” This excerpt shows the 
scene unfolding before our eyes. It also shows an allusion to the Tree of Life 
from Genesis; however, in this story it is a liquid instead of a food. This 
allusion helps the reader relate to the story; however, the allusion should not 
be the first thing that comes to my mind. It is, however, because I know that 
story. I don’t know the Iroquois Creation Story, thus showing that Native 
Americans are voiceless in the telling of their history. The term used “some 
say” also shows that they are voiceless, because Native Americans don’t have a 
set written copy of their creation. The dominant culture has The Bible, while 
Native Americans have “creation stories.” The underrepresentation of Native 
American creation literature in schools is overwhelming, and it shows how they 
are voiceless.  
         
Native Americans were also choiceless in their history. When referring 
back to American History, Native Americans did not have a choice in whether or 
not they were removed from their homelands. They were FORCED to relocate, or 
they would be killed in the process. Native Americans didn’t even have a say in 
whether or not the white man came to America. An origin story by Handsome Lake 
shows this exact lack of a choice that Native Americans had. He describes how 
Columbus came, saw the land, left, and returned with a pack of five things. 
These five things would eventually lead to the downfall of the Native Americans 
(alcohol, gambling, disease, etc.). However, Handsome Lake refers to this 
commonly known story in a calm manner. He doesn’t attack Columbus, but rather he 
blames the evil invisible man for knowing what he was doing in sending Columbus. 
The underlying factor is that the Natives did not have a choice in whether or 
not Columbus discovered America and forced his way in, it was predetermined by 
the invisible man for this to happen. This origin story shows how Native 
Americans were choiceless in their adventures here in America. 
         
Another device that is shown in Native American literature is personal 
narrative. Zitkala Sa wrote a series of experiences that she had as an Indian 
girl growing up. Through her stories, the idea of forced participation through 
religion is shown. Zitkala Sa talks about in “Impressions of and Indian 
Childhood” the apple from Genesis. Zitkala Sa mentions the “nice red apples” as 
being a tool for her to hopefully reach a wonderland. The tone is very satirical 
as Sa shows that the story of the apple in Genesis is one that she doesn’t 
believe in. However, since she is forced to learn about these stories, she knows 
about the history. By using satire, Zitkala Sa is able to show the reader that 
Native Americans are forced to participate in learning of the dominant culture. 
         
Zitkala Sa also talks about forced participation in “The School Days of 
an Indian Girl” when she mentions Thowin. Thowin falls in the snow, and the 
“paleface lady” comes out to correct his behavior. The lady spanks Thowin as he 
disobeys her, forcing him to do as she says unless he wants to face the 
repercussions. This forced participation takes away the power from the Native 
Americans and keeps it with the dominant culture. In this same writing, Sa uses 
a form of detournement when speaking of Satan. In the dominant culture, Satan is 
someone to be feared and hated. Nobody wants to be like Satan. However, Zitkala 
Sa mentions that he had bearded cheeks “just like [she] had seen some palefaces 
wear.” By saying this, Zitkala Sa is showing how to Native Americans, Satan 
looks like the white man. She flips the image of Satan around to the white man 
and shows them that they quite possibly could be more like him than they think. 
Zitkala’s personal narrative is a literary device that she uses to show that 
Native American stories matter. Her work shows us that Native Americans are 
often forced to participate in religion and in good behavior.  
         
However, the most prominent ideal of Native American literature that I 
have learned is the one of loss and survival, and particularly the one of loss. 
As previously mentioned, the history books have not favored the Native 
Americans. They have always been on the side that is being marginalized, they 
are underrepresented, and they don’t get to have a say in their history. Their 
story is one of loss and a fight to survive.  
This 
idea of loss is never better justified than in Louis Erdrich’s novel “The Round 
House.” In this novel, the main character Joe is out to seek justice and revenge 
for his mother Geraldine. Geraldine was raped and almost killed, and this has 
caused a fire to be lit inside of Joe. Joe eventually realizes that if there is 
something to be done to solve this case, he must do it. The police fail them 
because they can’t get past the basics of whether or not the crime was committed 
on Indian or American land, thus causing jurisdictional issues. These 
jurisdictional issues showcase the loss the Native Americans face in the court 
system. The court system fails Native Americans, especially Native American 
women as Erdrich mentions in the afterword that “1 in 3 Native women are raped.” 
This statistic is mindboggling as we don’t hear about these. More than likely, 
they often go unreported because of the way that Natives are treated. This 
further proves how Natives are voiceless. 
         
The other loss that Joe and his family experience is obvious: Cappy, 
Joe’s best friend, dies at the end of the novel due to drunk driving. This loss 
is experienced because the boys were out being stupid teenagers and drinking 
alcohol. (Keep in mind the stereotype of Native Americans and alcoholism) The 
cause of Cappy’s death being drunk driving is fitting, as it shows how Native 
American life is devastated constantly by the use of alcohol. Alcohol that was 
originally brought over to the Americas by the white man, and as Handsome Lake 
said in his origin story, would devastate the Native American society. Erdrich 
is showing the loss of Cappy’s life as an analogy for the loss of many Native 
lives due to alcohol, further proving that Native Americans are choiceless. 
         
When thinking about Native American literature, I think of stories that 
help represent Native peoples. I think, primarily of “The Round House” and how 
it showcases a story of loss, and how this is allegorical for the Native 
American experience. I also think of the creation and origin stories, and how 
they tell a different perspective from the one that I commonly hear. I also 
think of Chrytos’ poem “I Have Not Signed a Treaty with the American Government” 
and how it discusses the issue of Native Americans being voiceless and 
choiceless in today’s society. Native American literature showcases the 
qualities of a minority culture in voiceless choiceless decisions, and in 
stories of loss. Native American stories matter, as they can show the United 
States of its past crimes against them. It can also serve as a voice to the 
voiceless. 
 
 
 
 
 
 |